All right, then. You guys are my latest blog-crush. Three cheers for you, and all that.
I haven't commented here because it seemed like you had such a nice party going already, and I didn't want to crash it. Also, I don't know very many cock jokes.
It is too early in the morning for this, really (even by my standards. OK, well, maybe not) but I did a web search for "cock jokes" to help Chris out and found this NOT WORK OR CHILD FRIENDLY site, about cocks
I know I *shouldn't* be surprised, and yet ...
and what rating criteria should we be using, anyway? This could be so subjective! And do we look ONLY at the cock or consider the full context?
Of course. It's all about specialization. If you feel the need to branch out, we could start scaring up the venture capital to launch ratemynutsack.com.
Oh dear. Those pictures did make me blush. But I don't really get it - why are the candidate weenies flaccid? I've never entered such a contest, but I've always assumed that the right thing to do is to work up a bit more . . . enthusiasm first.
At any rate, I stumbled across this link just moments ago. I proudly submit it, as my first cock-link to Unfogged. Since my mom reads my blog, I think it's the first cock-link I've posted anywhere.
Pffft. I bet I can find twenty linguists who would say "Wolfson and me" is OK there. It's not really an elliptical sentence. You had me on "pround" but this one just rolls on by. (Note: I am not actually going to bother trying to find twenty linguists.)
Those linguists would probably also say that your other corrections (and mine too) were misguided. Languagehat, for example, would. "Elliptical sentence" won't fly; are you saying it's elliptical for "that's the other thing Wolfson and me do here"? Am you bizarro Weiner, or what?
Nah, I'm saying it's not elliptical at all. "We do this?" "Who?" "Wolfson and me." Actually that probably is elliptical. Shit. Was the cock joke a description of the phrase "Weiner's punishment," or is it like doing a Hail Mary and three Our Fathers?
Well at first I thought "self-punishment" -> "self-abuse", and then, you know, your name is homophonous with wiener, so I was trying to imply that your self-punishment, ie, masturbation, ie, WANKING, is itself a cock joke, because you have a small wang, or something.
I love visiting Unfogged! I can always count on a good laugh, especially in the comments. Someone here recently noted the blog's mix of high- and low-brow material; I think that's what I like most about it. You guys don't take yourselves too seriously.
I do wonder, however, what you all - commenters, included - do for a living that you're able to post and comment throughout the day.
Re: the cock jokes: Well, I love a good cock joke as much as the next person, so I've been expecting to have some good laughs here. I've noted, along with cw, the discrepancy between the amount of talk about cock jokes versus actually telling cock jokes. But since I don't have any to contribute - and I have been on the lookout! - I suppose I'm not helping Unfogged's cock-joke-challenged situation.
cw wasn't supposed to say what he said; that was unfogged's big secret. Everyone please go back to thinking it's a cock-joke-a-minute around here. And let's not mention the fact that the topic that occupies most of our time is grammar.
All right, then. You guys are my latest blog-crush. Three cheers for you, and all that.
I haven't commented here because it seemed like you had such a nice party going already, and I didn't want to crash it. Also, I don't know very many cock jokes.
Posted by Chris | Link to this comment | 02-23-05 6:18 AM
It is too early in the morning for this, really (even by my standards. OK, well, maybe not) but I did a web search for "cock jokes" to help Chris out and found this NOT WORK OR CHILD FRIENDLY site, about cocks
I know I *shouldn't* be surprised, and yet ...
and what rating criteria should we be using, anyway? This could be so subjective! And do we look ONLY at the cock or consider the full context?
Posted by profgrrrrl | Link to this comment | 02-23-05 7:45 AM
do we look ONLY at the cock
Of course. It's all about specialization. If you feel the need to branch out, we could start scaring up the venture capital to launch ratemynutsack.com.
Posted by apostropher | Link to this comment | 02-23-05 8:00 AM
[redacted]
Posted by [redacted] | Link to this comment | 02-23-05 8:23 AM
Oh dear. Those pictures did make me blush. But I don't really get it - why are the candidate weenies flaccid? I've never entered such a contest, but I've always assumed that the right thing to do is to work up a bit more . . . enthusiasm first.
At any rate, I stumbled across this link just moments ago. I proudly submit it, as my first cock-link to Unfogged. Since my mom reads my blog, I think it's the first cock-link I've posted anywhere.
Posted by Chris | Link to this comment | 02-23-05 8:42 AM
Well then, I'll add this one (work-safe and very funny) that I'd never have read were it not for the name-your-fave-shebloggers thread.
Posted by apostropher | Link to this comment | 02-23-05 8:50 AM
Also, I don't know very many cock jokes.
Chris, you'll fit right in. The ratio of actually making cock jokes to talking about them and referencing old ones is about a million to one.
Posted by cw | Link to this comment | 02-23-05 8:52 AM
One to a million, cw. (That's the other thing we do here, Chris. Well, Wolfson and me. Wolfson started it.)
Posted by Matt Weiner | Link to this comment | 02-23-05 9:01 AM
And the cock, though not exceptional, was large enough to crash the computer.
Unfogged ... enough cock to crash your computer.
Posted by profgrrrrl | Link to this comment | 02-23-05 9:02 AM
Shouldn't that be "Wolfson and I"?
Posted by apostropher | Link to this comment | 02-23-05 9:05 AM
Don't you go all grammar on me too now. But Weiner: busted. Probably time for some self-punishment.
Posted by ogged | Link to this comment | 02-23-05 9:08 AM
Yes.
Posted by ben wolfson | Link to this comment | 02-23-05 9:13 AM
Weiner's self-punishment: a cock joke?
Posted by ben wolfson | Link to this comment | 02-23-05 9:14 AM
Pffft. I bet I can find twenty linguists who would say "Wolfson and me" is OK there. It's not really an elliptical sentence. You had me on "pround" but this one just rolls on by. (Note: I am not actually going to bother trying to find twenty linguists.)
Posted by Matt Weiner | Link to this comment | 02-23-05 9:36 AM
Those linguists would probably also say that your other corrections (and mine too) were misguided. Languagehat, for example, would. "Elliptical sentence" won't fly; are you saying it's elliptical for "that's the other thing Wolfson and me do here"? Am you bizarro Weiner, or what?
Posted by ben wolfson | Link to this comment | 02-23-05 9:37 AM
twenty linguists
Descriptivist heretics, the lot of them.
Posted by apostropher | Link to this comment | 02-23-05 9:38 AM
Nah, I'm saying it's not elliptical at all. "We do this?" "Who?" "Wolfson and me." Actually that probably is elliptical. Shit. Was the cock joke a description of the phrase "Weiner's punishment," or is it like doing a Hail Mary and three Our Fathers?
Posted by Matt Weiner | Link to this comment | 02-23-05 9:42 AM
Well at first I thought "self-punishment" -> "self-abuse", and then, you know, your name is homophonous with wiener, so I was trying to imply that your self-punishment, ie, masturbation, ie, WANKING, is itself a cock joke, because you have a small wang, or something.
Posted by ben wolfson | Link to this comment | 02-23-05 9:44 AM
I love visiting Unfogged! I can always count on a good laugh, especially in the comments. Someone here recently noted the blog's mix of high- and low-brow material; I think that's what I like most about it. You guys don't take yourselves too seriously.
I do wonder, however, what you all - commenters, included - do for a living that you're able to post and comment throughout the day.
Re: the cock jokes: Well, I love a good cock joke as much as the next person, so I've been expecting to have some good laughs here. I've noted, along with cw, the discrepancy between the amount of talk about cock jokes versus actually telling cock jokes. But since I don't have any to contribute - and I have been on the lookout! - I suppose I'm not helping Unfogged's cock-joke-challenged situation.
Posted by isabel | Link to this comment | 02-23-05 2:09 PM
cw wasn't supposed to say what he said; that was unfogged's big secret. Everyone please go back to thinking it's a cock-joke-a-minute around here. And let's not mention the fact that the topic that occupies most of our time is grammar.
Posted by ogged | Link to this comment | 02-23-05 2:18 PM
Comment #8 was about sense, not grammar! I prefer the broader nitpicking.
Posted by Matt Weiner | Link to this comment | 02-23-05 2:31 PM