To demonstrate that not all lawyers are the same, here at Unfogged in-house lawyer-blogger Unf demonstrates the other end of the spectrum, spending full months deep in thought fasting (drinking only llamas' milk), and pondering the quality if his thoughts before daring a post. Such posts are like great jewels, and Unf's venerable wisdom is revealed the only way it can be, through poetic wordplay.
Sorry to post an on-topic comment, but it does seem that this has to be part of the explanation. GR's posting habits suggest that he just leaves the window in the background, adding a post every time he checks his mail. That's why I was so surprised to hear that he's got a book contract-- it's not the kind of style that inspires confidence in a much longer, slower format.
Oh, there's plenty of evidence that he doesn't really read a lot of what he posts about. But that serves him well -- when he posts a link to something really nutty and gets busted on it, he backs off real fast.
I mean, Glenn seems to be saying something completely reasonable to me --- we've heard this story over and over again and it never pans out, why get excited now. I mean, I yawned and ignored it when I myself saw the headline.
I don't know, maybe teenagers haven't been through enough iterations of the "strong scientific evidence for something really cool" game to have caught onto it, but some of us are smarter than Charly Brown when Lucy presents the football. I mean --- Antarctic meteorites from Mars with microfossils in them; cold fusion; sonic fusion; laser fusion; the never-ending rounds of "substance x [salt | sugar | wine | butter ...] is [good | bad] for you in [small | large] doses as proved by the diets of [pygmies | the French | Japanese | seals]"
Science is not well understood or usefully followed through press reports.
Heck, if this is real, the story will still be there in three months when the confirming reports come in, and if not, well, that's a whole lot of psychic energy I didn't waste.
Maynard: "What's your problem with Reynolds? This really is a nonstory until more conclusive evidence comes in."
Backtrack.
Reynolds: "The nonreporting on this story is another example of MSM bias! They would've reported it if it alleged something bad about Bush!! gArCXXXTTHHUUL!!!" As an aside, I suppose it's *possible* that there's a non-Bush-hating reason to be found somewhere...
I read AO Scott's review in the NY Times, and I think it was a terrible piece of reviewing. The quick answer is "not as bad as he was trying to convey."
I went in with rock-bottom expectations and ended up actually enjoying the film. It had some interesting camera work, and I actually liked Keanu Reeves's performance. I have a reservations, but overall, I think the movie did a fairly good job of adapting the story from the graphic novel. Of course, one of the problems with me saying that is that, as a reader of the graphic novels, I'm more clued into the world the movie takes place in.
If you feel like a little cryptic horror making use of christian myth, it's definately worth it.
Oh, and I hear that there's an extra scene after the credits if you go see it. I missed that.
And if you want me to expound upon how the movie differs from the comic...
I don't imagine the crew Glenn helped get reelected to the White House want to talk about life on Mars. I don't think the fundies would take that well. The media is lazy and spends most of its time rewriting press releases from politicians. That's why we haven't heard that much about this.
I think you're on to something. But also he gets metric shitloads of positive re-enforcement for what he does. So why try to do better?
I could forgive a lot though if only he had more cock jokes.
That said, and hopefully needless to say, I wish his wife a speedy recovery and all the best to both of them.
Posted by Mitch Mills | Link to this comment | 02-19-05 7:40 PM
To demonstrate that not all lawyers are the same, here at Unfogged in-house lawyer-blogger Unf demonstrates the other end of the spectrum, spending full months deep in thought fasting (drinking only llamas' milk), and pondering the quality if his thoughts before daring a post. Such posts are like great jewels, and Unf's venerable wisdom is revealed the only way it can be, through poetic wordplay.
you can't spell unfogged without unf.
Is there anything in the world worse than having to fly somwhere for just a day? Well, sure there is
what's really important in life is being able to watch The Empire Strikes Back at decibels loud enough to create fractures in concrete.
Why must you be such a little bitch?
I think Augusta ought to admit women members, though I'd gladly cave on that point if they offered me a free membership.
Posted by Michael | Link to this comment | 02-19-05 8:51 PM
Michael, you've performed a great service, but I worry about you.
Posted by ogged | Link to this comment | 02-19-05 9:00 PM
Yeah, going to watch Constantine now by myself. See y'all later.
Posted by Michael | Link to this comment | 02-19-05 9:01 PM
Sorry to post an on-topic comment, but it does seem that this has to be part of the explanation. GR's posting habits suggest that he just leaves the window in the background, adding a post every time he checks his mail. That's why I was so surprised to hear that he's got a book contract-- it's not the kind of style that inspires confidence in a much longer, slower format.
Posted by FL | Link to this comment | 02-19-05 10:51 PM
Oh, there's plenty of evidence that he doesn't really read a lot of what he posts about. But that serves him well -- when he posts a link to something really nutty and gets busted on it, he backs off real fast.
Posted by praktike | Link to this comment | 02-19-05 11:05 PM
What exactly are people complaining about?
I mean, Glenn seems to be saying something completely reasonable to me --- we've heard this story over and over again and it never pans out, why get excited now. I mean, I yawned and ignored it when I myself saw the headline.
I don't know, maybe teenagers haven't been through enough iterations of the "strong scientific evidence for something really cool" game to have caught onto it, but some of us are smarter than Charly Brown when Lucy presents the football. I mean --- Antarctic meteorites from Mars with microfossils in them; cold fusion; sonic fusion; laser fusion; the never-ending rounds of "substance x [salt | sugar | wine | butter ...] is [good | bad] for you in [small | large] doses as proved by the diets of [pygmies | the French | Japanese | seals]"
Science is not well understood or usefully followed through press reports.
Heck, if this is real, the story will still be there in three months when the confirming reports come in, and if not, well, that's a whole lot of psychic energy I didn't waste.
Posted by Maynard Handley | Link to this comment | 02-20-05 11:44 AM
Paraphrase:
Maynard: "What's your problem with Reynolds? This really is a nonstory until more conclusive evidence comes in."
Backtrack.
Reynolds: "The nonreporting on this story is another example of MSM bias! They would've reported it if it alleged something bad about Bush!! gArCXXXTTHHUUL!!!" As an aside, I suppose it's *possible* that there's a non-Bush-hating reason to be found somewhere...
Ogged: "WTF man?"
Posted by Michael | Link to this comment | 02-20-05 1:22 PM
Hey Michael, was Constantine as bad as the critics say? I.e., not quite bad enough to wrap around the pole and become good?
Posted by rilkefan | Link to this comment | 02-20-05 2:59 PM
I read AO Scott's review in the NY Times, and I think it was a terrible piece of reviewing. The quick answer is "not as bad as he was trying to convey."
I went in with rock-bottom expectations and ended up actually enjoying the film. It had some interesting camera work, and I actually liked Keanu Reeves's performance. I have a reservations, but overall, I think the movie did a fairly good job of adapting the story from the graphic novel. Of course, one of the problems with me saying that is that, as a reader of the graphic novels, I'm more clued into the world the movie takes place in.
If you feel like a little cryptic horror making use of christian myth, it's definately worth it.
Oh, and I hear that there's an extra scene after the credits if you go see it. I missed that.
And if you want me to expound upon how the movie differs from the comic...
Posted by Michael | Link to this comment | 02-20-05 3:13 PM
I don't imagine the crew Glenn helped get reelected to the White House want to talk about life on Mars. I don't think the fundies would take that well. The media is lazy and spends most of its time rewriting press releases from politicians. That's why we haven't heard that much about this.
Posted by Brian | Link to this comment | 02-21-05 12:22 PM