You know, I think indulging public cruising out of a sense of gay friendly allegiance is wrong.
Having dropped by parks with my kids in which we fled because of the number of men in the bushes, I think there is no reason to condone sex in the bushes or restrooms. There are hotels, these people have homes, and hey there's always the mineshaft. Supporting gay rights and partnership does not mean tolerating sex in public places. In fact, one of the reasons to support gay rights is so that we don't have to accept cruising.
but do you really have to reveal where it happens?
your December weekend in NYC plans now destroyed?
Posted by mike d | Link to this comment | 09-21-05 10:06 AM
Nevermind that, what do you think of my socks?
Posted by ogged | Link to this comment | 09-21-05 10:08 AM
I love the signs in LA that declare the area a "No Cruising Zone".
Posted by silvana | Link to this comment | 09-21-05 10:08 AM
they match your shoelaces- nice.
Posted by mike d | Link to this comment | 09-21-05 10:11 AM
Re: the picture caption:
One guy standing next to his car is a "scene"?
I mean, what exactly is the point of including that photo with the article?
Posted by My Alter Ego | Link to this comment | 09-21-05 10:29 AM
To make homosexuality appear all the more shameful.
Posted by Joe Drymala | Link to this comment | 09-21-05 10:36 AM
You know, I think indulging public cruising out of a sense of gay friendly allegiance is wrong.
Having dropped by parks with my kids in which we fled because of the number of men in the bushes, I think there is no reason to condone sex in the bushes or restrooms. There are hotels, these people have homes, and hey there's always the mineshaft. Supporting gay rights and partnership does not mean tolerating sex in public places. In fact, one of the reasons to support gay rights is so that we don't have to accept cruising.
Posted by cw | Link to this comment | 09-21-05 10:51 AM
[redacted]
Posted by [redacted] | Link to this comment | 09-21-05 11:04 AM