yeah, nobody's going to run out of hummus--in New Shariastan!!!!! where are the western feminists now, when all those dutch chicks have to wear the veil and make hummus? I call decadence of the left!!!
I haven't finished the post or ready any of the comments, but I'm going to comment about something else anyway; and, really, is that unusual? I'm watching a vid on the Bugatti Veyron, which I have been drooling over for years. I can't believe I didn't know this factoid: If you lined up the Veyron with a McClaren F1 (previously the world's fastest car) and gave the F1 a head start, let it hit 120mph before tapping on the Bugatti's throttle, the Veyron would still hit 200mph first. I won't even ask if you wanted to know that, because I know you did.
Also, the boyish applecheeked looks of, well, a person, almost make you feel their writing persona isn't a persona but a huge puton. I don't really think that, though.
God, I come back and no one cares about how I'm dancing drunkenly on Sharon's grave.
Dear B/e\l/l\e,
I'm getting trashed on YOUR account, and I gave up drinking a decade ago. So IT'S ALL YOUR FAULT. If I had ever gone to AA, I would throw my chips at you.
I would like to point out, however, that this is really THE WRONG TIME for Sharon to make like a corpse. Three years ago, ok. Three years from now, go to town.
1) World population is still predicted to double once more before declining; ain't nobody going to run out of humans.
We're going to run out of Frogs, however.
2) Continuing medical advances will extend current lifespans.
No counting unhatched chickens.
3) All this EUrabia dhimmi bullshit is so obviously bullshit that I can't bestir myself to worry about it even a little.
The EU is more of threat to Europe then any Moslems will be for a long time.
4) Foam parties on Ibiza vs. a lot of fundamentalist assholes=total victory for fun.
If fun always won, we wouldn't have the Catholic Church.
There's a reason why we should all be feminists and why feminism should play a role in our thinking about foreign policy.
Because of the new suet-lining?
Poor, socially ostracized, culturally threatened men treat women like shit. Now, if only culturally secure, traditionalist men didn't also treat women like shit we'd really be going somewhere.
Right. It's all MY fault. I knew it would be. That's always the bottom line, innit?
Poor, socially ostracized, culturally threatened men treat women like shit. Now, if only culturally secure, traditionalist men didn't also treat women like shit we'd really be going somewhere.
"
The two messages I took away from _Mean Girls_ were that
(a) Lindsay Lohan can, if the lighting and makeup are just right and her top is tight enough, look marginally attractive and
(b) that girls have ample ability to also treat women like shit
The two messages I took away from _Mean Girls_ were that (a) Lindsay Lohan can, if the lighting and makeup are just right and her top is tight enough, look marginally attractive and (b) that girls have ample ability to also treat women like shit
1> Lindsay Lohan is not marginally attractive, she's pretty damn hot before she went to being an anoxeric blonde and 2> clearly, a really fantastic rack is the secret to calculus.
To elaborate on my 32, goodplasticsurgery.com and its companion site awfulplasticsurgery.com have opined (with pictures) that Lindsay's breasts were first surgically enlarged, then later shrunken.
On the other hand, really big moons are a sign of overactive thyroid function that can be bad for inteligence too. Unfortunately, no one in their right mind would do a study of fingernail moon size and intelligence to clear up this crucial question.
Dude, I'm so sorry. Also, your man is teh hott when painted metal.
Posted by FL | Link to this comment | 01- 5-06 11:59 PM
sure, and what am I when I'm painted metal, chopped liver painted metal? ;)
Posted by alameida | Link to this comment | 01- 6-06 12:00 AM
I initially read ain't nobody going to run out of humans as ain't nobody going to run out of hummus.
Posted by silvana | Link to this comment | 01- 6-06 12:01 AM
Hummus is pretty tasty.
Posted by David Weman | Link to this comment | 01- 6-06 12:04 AM
Oh sure, Labs is apologetic now, but when I ask him what he thinks he's doing he's all "muslim hordes! but the muslim hordes!"
Posted by ogged | Link to this comment | 01- 6-06 12:05 AM
yeah, nobody's going to run out of hummus--in New Shariastan!!!!! where are the western feminists now, when all those dutch chicks have to wear the veil and make hummus? I call decadence of the left!!!
Posted by alameida | Link to this comment | 01- 6-06 12:06 AM
Get him to post as many pictures of you painted metal as he did of himself, and we'll get back to you.
Posted by ben wolfson | Link to this comment | 01- 6-06 12:06 AM
Some people disagree.
Posted by silvana | Link to this comment | 01- 6-06 12:07 AM
About 4.
Posted by silvana | Link to this comment | 01- 6-06 12:08 AM
No one disagrees about 7.
Posted by David Weman | Link to this comment | 01- 6-06 12:09 AM
but alameida, is it a positive or negative correlation? I must know.
Posted by silvana | Link to this comment | 01- 6-06 12:12 AM
Al, I'd join you if I weren't on medication!
I haven't finished the post or ready any of the comments, but I'm going to comment about something else anyway; and, really, is that unusual? I'm watching a vid on the Bugatti Veyron, which I have been drooling over for years. I can't believe I didn't know this factoid: If you lined up the Veyron with a McClaren F1 (previously the world's fastest car) and gave the F1 a head start, let it hit 120mph before tapping on the Bugatti's throttle, the Veyron would still hit 200mph first. I won't even ask if you wanted to know that, because I know you did.
Posted by Michael | Link to this comment | 01- 6-06 12:14 AM
visibile moons in your fingernails?
Posted by Michael | Link to this comment | 01- 6-06 12:18 AM
Now thsi dude is someone you'd think would end up with Alameida and not in an odd couple way.
Posted by David Weman | Link to this comment | 01- 6-06 12:18 AM
ahem.
Posted by silvana | Link to this comment | 01- 6-06 12:19 AM
Those are two skinny lapels.
Posted by ben wolfson | Link to this comment | 01- 6-06 12:20 AM
(Am I being to careless about anonymity? Feel free to delete it.)
If 14 doesn't make sense to you, i did say 'end up with' so it makes sense anyway.
Posted by David Weman | Link to this comment | 01- 6-06 12:22 AM
Doesn't that violate A Rule?
Posted by silvana | Link to this comment | 01- 6-06 12:22 AM
I'm not sure it does. Unless someone did a link: search on google…
Posted by ben wolfson | Link to this comment | 01- 6-06 12:24 AM
I can never remember whether it's a) open secret b) unspoken open secret.
Posted by silvana | Link to this comment | 01- 6-06 12:26 AM
Well, the point is to keep it secret from various relations. I guess if some of them are really net savvy...
Posted by David Weman | Link to this comment | 01- 6-06 12:28 AM
It's unspoken because it needs to be hidden from google.
Posted by ogged | Link to this comment | 01- 6-06 12:28 AM
But if anyone reading Unfogged could figure it out...
Posted by silvana | Link to this comment | 01- 6-06 12:30 AM
I guess anyone already could. Ok, I'll shut up now.
Posted by silvana | Link to this comment | 01- 6-06 12:32 AM
Also, the boyish applecheeked looks of, well, a person, almost make you feel their writing persona isn't a persona but a huge puton. I don't really think that, though.
Posted by David Weman | Link to this comment | 01- 6-06 12:32 AM
God, I come back and no one cares about how I'm dancing drunkenly on Sharon's grave.
Dear B/e\l/l\e,
I'm getting trashed on YOUR account, and I gave up drinking a decade ago. So IT'S ALL YOUR FAULT. If I had ever gone to AA, I would throw my chips at you.
I would like to point out, however, that this is really THE WRONG TIME for Sharon to make like a corpse. Three years ago, ok. Three years from now, go to town.
1) World population is still predicted to double once more before declining; ain't nobody going to run out of humans.
We're going to run out of Frogs, however.
2) Continuing medical advances will extend current lifespans.
No counting unhatched chickens.
3) All this EUrabia dhimmi bullshit is so obviously bullshit that I can't bestir myself to worry about it even a little.
The EU is more of threat to Europe then any Moslems will be for a long time.
4) Foam parties on Ibiza vs. a lot of fundamentalist assholes=total victory for fun.
If fun always won, we wouldn't have the Catholic Church.
There's a reason why we should all be feminists and why feminism should play a role in our thinking about foreign policy.
Because of the new suet-lining?
Poor, socially ostracized, culturally threatened men treat women like shit. Now, if only culturally secure, traditionalist men didn't also treat women like shit we'd really be going somewhere.
Right. It's all MY fault. I knew it would be. That's always the bottom line, innit?
ash
['I need a new face.']
Posted by ash | Link to this comment | 01- 6-06 12:42 AM
I must be incomprehensible to the unitiated, but com o think of it maybe I'm incomprehensible, period.
Posted by David Weman | Link to this comment | 01- 6-06 12:42 AM
"
Poor, socially ostracized, culturally threatened men treat women like shit. Now, if only culturally secure, traditionalist men didn't also treat women like shit we'd really be going somewhere.
"
The two messages I took away from _Mean Girls_ were that
(a) Lindsay Lohan can, if the lighting and makeup are just right and her top is tight enough, look marginally attractive and
(b) that girls have ample ability to also treat women like shit
Posted by Maynard Handley | Link to this comment | 01- 6-06 12:53 AM
If fun always won, we wouldn't have the Catholic Church.
"What a pity it isn't a sin to drink water", cried an Italian, "how good it would taste!".
Posted by ben wolfson | Link to this comment | 01- 6-06 1:06 AM
The two messages I took away from _Mean Girls_ were that (a) Lindsay Lohan can, if the lighting and makeup are just right and her top is tight enough, look marginally attractive and (b) that girls have ample ability to also treat women like shit
1> Lindsay Lohan is not marginally attractive, she's pretty damn hot before she went to being an anoxeric blonde and 2> clearly, a really fantastic rack is the secret to calculus.
http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2004_09/004788.php#280041
I already said all that tho.
Nero Wolfson: "What a pity it isn't a sin to drink water", cried an Italian, "how good it would taste!".
Do shit like that more often, dude.
ash
['What? Are you disagreeing with me?']
Posted by ash | Link to this comment | 01- 6-06 2:41 AM
Lindsay Lohan is not marginally attractive, she's pretty damn hot before she went to being an ano[rex]ic blonde
Indeed.
Posted by Frederick | Link to this comment | 01- 6-06 7:08 AM
I do suspect, however, that LiLo's ample rack was surgically enhanced. I believe that goodplasticsurgery.com has so opined.
Posted by Frederick | Link to this comment | 01- 6-06 7:10 AM
It's all MY fault. I knew it would be. That's always the bottom line, innit?
Since it's ash, I totally read that as claiming this all to be Matthew Yglesias's fault.
Posted by Becks | Link to this comment | 01- 6-06 7:44 AM
Matt Yglesias: Innocuous pundit, or oppressor of women? The debate continues.
Posted by Matt F | Link to this comment | 01- 6-06 7:50 AM
To elaborate on my 32, goodplasticsurgery.com and its companion site awfulplasticsurgery.com have opined (with pictures) that Lindsay's breasts were first surgically enlarged, then later shrunken.
Posted by Frederick | Link to this comment | 01- 6-06 7:59 AM
Speaking of awfulplasticsurgery.com, this never ceases to trip me out.
Posted by Tia | Link to this comment | 01- 6-06 9:07 AM
innocuouspundit.com is waiting for somebody to stake a claim and set up shop.
Posted by Jeremy Osner | Link to this comment | 01- 6-06 9:15 AM
Also ingenuouspundit.com -- which would you rather be, ingenous or innocuous?
Posted by Jeremy Osner | Link to this comment | 01- 6-06 10:12 AM
Of course women treat other women like shit. Treating women like shit is the route to power in the world.
Posted by bitchphd | Link to this comment | 01- 6-06 10:16 AM
36: I'm not seeing what I'm supposed to be seeing.
Posted by Matt Weiner | Link to this comment | 01- 6-06 11:06 AM
Alameida's brother could be right. If you have no visible moons on your fingernails it is possible that you have low thyroid function. Low thyroid function in you or your mother while pregnant with you can result in low intellegence.
On the other hand, really big moons are a sign of overactive thyroid function that can be bad for inteligence too. Unfortunately, no one in their right mind would do a study of fingernail moon size and intelligence to clear up this crucial question.
Posted by Joe O | Link to this comment | 01- 6-06 2:01 PM
Treating women like shit is the route to power in the world.
Hasn't gotten me anywhere.
Posted by Michael | Link to this comment | 01- 6-06 2:28 PM
Then you're not trying hard enough.
Posted by washerdreyer | Link to this comment | 01- 6-06 5:10 PM