I'm sorry to point this out, but Botticelli was a favorite of that high school teacher who so throroughly disgusted you. At least I remember him spending multiple classes on it, for reasons I don't remember.
Rules-clarifying question: The version of this game that I once played stipulated that all first-order questions must have as a possible answer someone who matches all the ascertained info about the mystery person at the time the question is asked. E.g., as of comment 5 in this thread, I can only ask questions where I can think of a dead person whose name begins with F as a possible answer to my question. Is this rule in effect here?
Oh, I wasn't asking you to hate Botticelli, but I thought I'd mention it since I wasn't sure he kept "assigning" it. However, it requires an attention span I lack.
(The first question that came to mind was "Do you live in subsidized housing?" Must remember the distinction between my job and Unfogged. Gets so mixed up sometimes.)
New 1st order question: did you spend your childhood in the South but move out to the Bay Area (attending El Cerrito High School!!1!!) before becoming a famous musician?
France, Portugal, Spain, England/Scotland/Wales/Ireland if you think of them as part of Europe, Germany, Belgium, Switzerland, the Netherlands, Italy, Luxembourg, Lichtenstein, Monaco. This deviates from the UN definition, apparently, but oh well.
106: Oh, I see. I don't know the rules in that case. I think Tia would be allowed to shut down a follow-up by knowing you were talking about Anna Freud without letting on that the same question would have a different answer as a second-order.
It's just the potential for playing for six hours, and at the end finding yourself whining "But you said you weren't Anna Freud ages ago!" Tends to lead to petty bickering and and annoyance.
But as long as you keep first and second order straight there shouldn't be a problem. Unlike other electronic Botticelli machines, Unfogged can generate a paper trail.
So if I've got this straight, if a 2nd order gives you an idea about who it is, you have to then ask an unrelated 1st order, so that you can ask another 2nd order.
So if I've got this straight, if a 2nd order gives you an idea about who it is, you have to then ask an unrelated 1st order, so that you can ask another 2nd order.
But what if I had asked "Was your father a famous psychiatrist?" completely innocently? Is Tia supposed to think of another suitable F and say "no, I'm not Amma Frevd" or something? Or say she doesn't know?
Here's what I say. Next time, we play by MAE's variation in 17, since that will make it harder for our questioners. Since the further it gets narrowed the harder it is not to ask a first order question that would describe the mystery person, should the questioner ask, innocently or no, about Anna Freud, the answerer should just concede that's who she is.
You say, "no I'm not Anna Freud" and that's taken to mean "I guessed you were thinking of Anna Freud" for first order purposes. Nothing said in response to a first order question should be taken to have any relevancy whatsoever to the second order question. So yes, I'm Anna Freud is still valid at the second order level.
I've never played this in a way that "No, I'm not X" for a first order answer has meant you can't later guess X at the second order. But I've also never played for 6 hours.
Well, I've partially ruined my own. This reminds me too much of how I used to enjoy capture the flag until every game seemed to turn into a dispute over the rules.
You say, "no I'm not Anna Freud" and that's taken to mean "I guessed you were thinking of Anna Freud" for first order purposes. Nothing said in response to a first order question should be taken to have any relevancy whatsoever to the second order question.
In that case shouldn't the formula be "I guess you were thinking of Anna Freud" and not "I'm not Anna Freud", since the successful guess is all that matters?
Did you always wear hats?
Posted by John Tingley | Link to this comment | 03-17-06 12:22 PM
mmm...shoot. uh. I don't know.
Posted by Tia | Link to this comment | 03-17-06 12:24 PM
Dead or Alive?
Posted by John Tingley | Link to this comment | 03-17-06 12:25 PM
The lore of this blog requires that you be Franz Fanon.
Posted by FL | Link to this comment | 03-17-06 12:26 PM
dead
Posted by Tia | Link to this comment | 03-17-06 12:26 PM
(Hey, you're supposed to tell me who you were thinking of)
Posted by Tia | Link to this comment | 03-17-06 12:26 PM
Do you like to dress up in undergarments intended for the opposite sex?
Posted by The Modesto Kid | Link to this comment | 03-17-06 12:27 PM
I'm sorry to point this out, but Botticelli was a favorite of that high school teacher who so throroughly disgusted you. At least I remember him spending multiple classes on it, for reasons I don't remember.
Posted by eb | Link to this comment | 03-17-06 12:28 PM
Oh I see -- I did not completely understand the rules. Disregard my 7 as a not-well-formed first order question.
Posted by The Modesto Kid | Link to this comment | 03-17-06 12:29 PM
TMK: Okay, I can't think of any F person for that. eb, I remember. I don't have to hate everything associated with him. Hating him is enough.
Posted by Tia | Link to this comment | 03-17-06 12:29 PM
Were you killed by a trusted associate?
Posted by The Modesto Kid | Link to this comment | 03-17-06 12:30 PM
wait, what? 7 was fine.
Posted by Tia | Link to this comment | 03-17-06 12:30 PM
Did you meet lots of famous science fiction writers in your job in publishing?
Posted by ac | Link to this comment | 03-17-06 12:31 PM
Ack -- no -- still not got this figured out. Carry on! I'll get it sooner or later.
Posted by The Modesto Kid | Link to this comment | 03-17-06 12:31 PM
(Oh, it's not fine if your person doesn't begin with F. Obviously I can give you Ed Wood and Eddie Izzard for starters.)
Posted by Tia | Link to this comment | 03-17-06 12:31 PM
15 -- exactly. This is the part that I wasn't fully grokking.
Posted by The Modesto Kid | Link to this comment | 03-17-06 12:33 PM
Rules-clarifying question: The version of this game that I once played stipulated that all first-order questions must have as a possible answer someone who matches all the ascertained info about the mystery person at the time the question is asked. E.g., as of comment 5 in this thread, I can only ask questions where I can think of a dead person whose name begins with F as a possible answer to my question. Is this rule in effect here?
Posted by My Alter Ego | Link to this comment | 03-17-06 12:33 PM
Do your parents think you're on drugs?
Posted by apostropher | Link to this comment | 03-17-06 12:33 PM
Oh, I wasn't asking you to hate Botticelli, but I thought I'd mention it since I wasn't sure he kept "assigning" it. However, it requires an attention span I lack.
Posted by eb | Link to this comment | 03-17-06 12:34 PM
13: No I'm not Gary Farber.
11: I guess I dunno.
Posted by Tia | Link to this comment | 03-17-06 12:34 PM
17: That rule is not in effect, though it sounds like an interesting variation and maybe a good idea for future games.
Posted by Tia | Link to this comment | 03-17-06 12:36 PM
OK: Did you fight in Sicily?
Posted by The Modesto Kid | Link to this comment | 03-17-06 12:36 PM
Did you star in War and Peace?
Posted by ac | Link to this comment | 03-17-06 12:38 PM
20: My 11 was also not-well-formed. But 22, that's the reel deel.
Posted by The Modesto Kid | Link to this comment | 03-17-06 12:38 PM
22: Is that a second order question? No.
Posted by Tia | Link to this comment | 03-17-06 12:38 PM
25: see 24.
Posted by The Modesto Kid | Link to this comment | 03-17-06 12:39 PM
23: Google temptation...so strong. But I dunno.
Okay I see. I dunno to 22 as well.
Posted by Tia | Link to this comment | 03-17-06 12:40 PM
Are you buried in Rockville, MD?
Posted by Matt F | Link to this comment | 03-17-06 12:41 PM
27: Yay! I was thinking of Giuseppe Fanelli. 1st order q: Are you a man or a woman?
Posted by The Modesto Kid | Link to this comment | 03-17-06 12:42 PM
27- So you're not Mel Ferrer. Are you a man?
Posted by ac | Link to this comment | 03-17-06 12:42 PM
Can I get another yes/no question?
Posted by ac | Link to this comment | 03-17-06 12:43 PM
Hey ac asked the same 1st-order as I. I call do-overs!
Posted by The Modesto Kid | Link to this comment | 03-17-06 12:43 PM
29: I'm a woman.
28: I dunno.
(MAE's variation might be good here because there are multiple questioners. Noted for future games.)
Posted by Tia | Link to this comment | 03-17-06 12:43 PM
Are you in a band with someone with the same first name?
Posted by Anthony | Link to this comment | 03-17-06 12:44 PM
New first order for ac!
Posted by Tia | Link to this comment | 03-17-06 12:44 PM
d'oh, I mean second order!
Posted by Tia | Link to this comment | 03-17-06 12:45 PM
Are you American?
Posted by ac | Link to this comment | 03-17-06 12:45 PM
37: no
34: I dunno.
Posted by Tia | Link to this comment | 03-17-06 12:45 PM
Are you based in Northern California and have a millionaire husband?
Posted by Jackmormon | Link to this comment | 03-17-06 12:47 PM
So you're not John Flansburgh. Did you write books?
Posted by Anthony | Link to this comment | 03-17-06 12:47 PM
(The first question that came to mind was "Do you live in subsidized housing?" Must remember the distinction between my job and Unfogged. Gets so mixed up sometimes.)
Posted by ac | Link to this comment | 03-17-06 12:47 PM
So you're not F. Scott Fitzgerald. Were you alive in the 20th century?
Posted by Matt F | Link to this comment | 03-17-06 12:48 PM
39: No I'm not Heidi Fleiss? I'm not sure if that works. Google might also be useful for arbitration.
42: yes
40: no
Posted by Tia | Link to this comment | 03-17-06 12:51 PM
Did you fight in Manila?
Posted by The Modesto Kid | Link to this comment | 03-17-06 12:52 PM
44: mmm...dunno.
Posted by Tia | Link to this comment | 03-17-06 12:53 PM
Ok, I'll play a bit. First order: Have people speculated that you were Richard Henry Lee or Melanchton Smith?
Posted by eb | Link to this comment | 03-17-06 12:53 PM
46: Ack, I dunno. Heidi Fleiss doesn't work for Jackmormon's, by the way, so she gets a second order.
Posted by Tia | Link to this comment | 03-17-06 12:54 PM
I just googled Fleiss; not only was she working out of Hollywood, she doesn't seem to be married. I was thinking of Diane Feinstein.
So....Were you in movies?
Posted by Jackmormon | Link to this comment | 03-17-06 12:55 PM
48: no
Posted by Tia | Link to this comment | 03-17-06 12:55 PM
Ok, so you're not the Federal Farmer. I'll ask second order after I figure out what has already been asked.
Posted by eb | Link to this comment | 03-17-06 12:55 PM
Review of facts thus far: Dead woman, alive in the twentieth century, didn't write books, not in movies, not American
Posted by Tia | Link to this comment | 03-17-06 12:56 PM
New 1st order question: did you spend your childhood in the South but move out to the Bay Area (attending El Cerrito High School!!1!!) before becoming a famous musician?
Posted by Jackmormon | Link to this comment | 03-17-06 12:57 PM
45 -- Then you're not Joe Frazier. Were you a painter?
Posted by The Modesto Kid | Link to this comment | 03-17-06 12:57 PM
I dunno, JM
Posted by Tia | Link to this comment | 03-17-06 12:58 PM
Did you fight in Canada?
Posted by The Modesto Kid | Link to this comment | 03-17-06 12:58 PM
Were you in politics?
Also, I am now convinced I lived in the same town as jm for a while.
Posted by eb | Link to this comment | 03-17-06 12:59 PM
OK, so you're not John Fogerty.
2nd order: were you from Europe?
Posted by Jackmormon | Link to this comment | 03-17-06 1:02 PM
1st order: Are you part of a theatrical family, an actor with two brothers who also act?
Posted by ac | Link to this comment | 03-17-06 1:03 PM
57: yes. 56: no.
55: It seems like I should be able to come up with one person whose name started with F who fought in Canada, but I dunno.
Posted by Tia | Link to this comment | 03-17-06 1:06 PM
Were you the part-Chilean mistress of royalty?
Posted by ben wolfson | Link to this comment | 03-17-06 1:06 PM
female?
Posted by chris | Link to this comment | 03-17-06 1:07 PM
58: wild guess: no I'm not Errol Flynn?
60: I dunno.
61: Is that a second order question? It's been answered, and you didn't ask a 1st order.
Posted by Tia | Link to this comment | 03-17-06 1:11 PM
59: so you're not Theodore Frelinghuysen. I will hold off asking a 2nd order until you answer my 53.
Posted by The Modesto Kid | Link to this comment | 03-17-06 1:12 PM
oops, sorry, no I wasn't a painter
Posted by Tia | Link to this comment | 03-17-06 1:12 PM
Then you're not Lady Furness. Are you from the Americas?
Posted by ben wolfson | Link to this comment | 03-17-06 1:14 PM
Were you an athlete?
Posted by The Modesto Kid | Link to this comment | 03-17-06 1:14 PM
Ben she already said she was from Europe.
Posted by The Modesto Kid | Link to this comment | 03-17-06 1:15 PM
1st: Did you have a film made about you by Jane Campion?
Posted by Anthony | Link to this comment | 03-17-06 1:16 PM
65: Ben, it's already been established that I'm European. Since IANALB, I will grant you another question.
66: No.
Posted by Tia | Link to this comment | 03-17-06 1:16 PM
Did you work for Fred Quimby?
Posted by The Modesto Kid | Link to this comment | 03-17-06 1:17 PM
Oh, I misread the order of answers, and thought you said you weren't European. Are you from western Europe?
Posted by ben wolfson | Link to this comment | 03-17-06 1:18 PM
Did you work with someone named Wilkins?
Posted by eb | Link to this comment | 03-17-06 1:18 PM
70: Is that Ramona Quimby's dad? Fuck. Henry? I can't remember his last name, but that's my guess.
68: I dunno.
Posted by Tia | Link to this comment | 03-17-06 1:20 PM
71: Can you define Western Europe for me roughly?
72: I dunno.
Posted by Tia | Link to this comment | 03-17-06 1:21 PM
So you're not Rosalind Franklin. Did you die young?
Posted by eb | Link to this comment | 03-17-06 1:23 PM
73: So are you saying "I dunno" in response to 70?
Posted by The Modesto Kid | Link to this comment | 03-17-06 1:23 PM
58- Errol Flynn had no acting brothers that I know of. But perhaps that can be googled. I was thinking of Colin Firth.
Posted by ac | Link to this comment | 03-17-06 1:24 PM
75: No.
76: Well, if Henry's wrong, then I'm saying I dunno.
Posted by Tia | Link to this comment | 03-17-06 1:25 PM
Are you a man who went by generalissimo in his lifetime?
Posted by Armsmasher | Link to this comment | 03-17-06 1:25 PM
France, Portugal, Spain, England/Scotland/Wales/Ireland if you think of them as part of Europe, Germany, Belgium, Switzerland, the Netherlands, Italy, Luxembourg, Lichtenstein, Monaco. This deviates from the UN definition, apparently, but oh well.
Posted by ben wolfson | Link to this comment | 03-17-06 1:26 PM
77: I was just guessing. Ask yer question. This totally needs to be harder for you guys though.
Posted by Tia | Link to this comment | 03-17-06 1:26 PM
80: I'm perhaps disproving my earlier assertion that IANALB, but I realized I also need you to define "from."
Posted by Tia | Link to this comment | 03-17-06 1:28 PM
Are you a theorist who, it is rumored, caught HIV in a San Francisco bathhouse?
Posted by Jackmormon | Link to this comment | 03-17-06 1:28 PM
78: Ah, then you must not be Friz Freleng.
Posted by The Modesto Kid | Link to this comment | 03-17-06 1:28 PM
I just killed a rat with a phone book. But that's nothing to do with the game.
So you're not Janet Frame. Did you have famous relatives?
Posted by Anthony | Link to this comment | 03-17-06 1:29 PM
83: no I'm not Foucault?
79: No I'm not Franco? That's a guess, but I figure maybe he was Italophilic or something.
Posted by Tia | Link to this comment | 03-17-06 1:29 PM
85: Yes
Posted by Tia | Link to this comment | 03-17-06 1:30 PM
Are you a child star born in Utica?
Posted by The Modesto Kid | Link to this comment | 03-17-06 1:31 PM
2nd order: Did you live in Paris?
Posted by ac | Link to this comment | 03-17-06 1:31 PM
Was your father a famous psychiatrist?
Posted by Anthony | Link to this comment | 03-17-06 1:31 PM
90: yes.
89: I don't think so, but Anthony's solved it anyway.
Posted by Tia | Link to this comment | 03-17-06 1:32 PM
Props to Anthony! Someone get this man a fruitbasket.
Posted by Tia | Link to this comment | 03-17-06 1:33 PM
Are you a comic actor who's moved into writing novels?
Posted by Jackmormon | Link to this comment | 03-17-06 1:33 PM
And 1st order from my 84 -- were you famous by virtue of being married to a famous man?
Posted by The Modesto Kid | Link to this comment | 03-17-06 1:33 PM
Are you Anna Freud?
And while rat-slaying too!
Posted by Anthony | Link to this comment | 03-17-06 1:33 PM
But did a first order question lead to 90?
Posted by eb | Link to this comment | 03-17-06 1:34 PM
You were serious about the rat? Where are you commenting from, the gulag?
Posted by LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 03-17-06 1:34 PM
Bravo, Anthony. Now who's got the fruit basket?
Posted by Jackmormon | Link to this comment | 03-17-06 1:34 PM
This is a game or rules, not men.
Posted by eb | Link to this comment | 03-17-06 1:34 PM
"of rules"
Posted by eb | Link to this comment | 03-17-06 1:35 PM
Oops, you're right, eb, he cheated! I got confused. No fruitbasket for Anthony!
OTOH, he knew anyway.
Posted by Tia | Link to this comment | 03-17-06 1:35 PM
Famous familes with F at 85. Thanks for the fruitbasket.
Posted by Anthony | Link to this comment | 03-17-06 1:36 PM
OTOH, he knew anyway.
Once Anne Frank was out (didn't die young) and central European origin was established (what's W Europe?) not too many choices were left.
Posted by eb | Link to this comment | 03-17-06 1:37 PM
How did I cheat? Did I miss a 1st order?
I'm in Sulawesi. Plenty of rats here.
Posted by Anthony | Link to this comment | 03-17-06 1:38 PM
Well, I wouldn't say cheat, since rules can vary, but you only get one second order question for each first order.
Posted by eb | Link to this comment | 03-17-06 1:40 PM
Hey, 90 was a 1st order - or aren't you allowed to ask them if they might be right?
Posted by Anthony | Link to this comment | 03-17-06 1:41 PM
It's okay, Anthony, you can have a fruitbasket anyway.
Posted by Tia | Link to this comment | 03-17-06 1:41 PM
Cool. Pretty pathetic rat, though, if it couldn't stand up to a mere phone book.
Probably plague-ridden.
Posted by LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 03-17-06 1:41 PM
It occurs to me that I'm coming off as being like SALB here.
Posted by eb | Link to this comment | 03-17-06 1:41 PM
Oh, I thought 90 was 2nd order. I think all questions designed to suss out the answer should be 2nd order, though this was not explicit in the rules.
Posted by Tia | Link to this comment | 03-17-06 1:42 PM
108: nonsense, our battle was the stuff of epics. It was only the Manado phone book too, so I had to do most of the work.
Posted by Anthony | Link to this comment | 03-17-06 1:43 PM
106: Oh, I see. I don't know the rules in that case. I think Tia would be allowed to shut down a follow-up by knowing you were talking about Anna Freud without letting on that the same question would have a different answer as a second-order.
Posted by eb | Link to this comment | 03-17-06 1:44 PM
112 -- not the way I've played in the past. The potential for confusion is too great.
Posted by LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 03-17-06 1:45 PM
Confusing = fun!
Posted by eb | Link to this comment | 03-17-06 1:47 PM
It's just the potential for playing for six hours, and at the end finding yourself whining "But you said you weren't Anna Freud ages ago!" Tends to lead to petty bickering and and annoyance.
Posted by LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 03-17-06 1:49 PM
But as long as you keep first and second order straight there shouldn't be a problem. Unlike other electronic Botticelli machines, Unfogged can generate a paper trail.
Posted by eb | Link to this comment | 03-17-06 1:50 PM
I forget, can you be thinking of a fictional character, or is the point of Botticelli that it's a real person?
Posted by ac | Link to this comment | 03-17-06 1:53 PM
Like, say, Botticelli.
Posted by ac | Link to this comment | 03-17-06 1:54 PM
You can pick a fictional character.
Posted by Tia | Link to this comment | 03-17-06 1:54 PM
As I've played, any person, real or fictional.
Posted by LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 03-17-06 1:54 PM
I ask because I kept thinking of Francesca Fiore throughout the thread.
Posted by ac | Link to this comment | 03-17-06 1:56 PM
So if I've got this straight, if a 2nd order gives you an idea about who it is, you have to then ask an unrelated 1st order, so that you can ask another 2nd order.
Posted by Anthony | Link to this comment | 03-17-06 1:57 PM
So if I've got this straight, if a 2nd order gives you an idea about who it is, you have to then ask an unrelated 1st order, so that you can ask another 2nd order.
But why? That's just stupid.
Posted by ben wolfson | Link to this comment | 03-17-06 1:59 PM
Bruno! Why you always kill, kill, kill all the time, time, time?
Posted by ac | Link to this comment | 03-17-06 2:00 PM
See, this is why I think the answerer should just answer all 1st orders without letting on if any could be revealing 2nd order questions.
Posted by eb | Link to this comment | 03-17-06 2:01 PM
Well, that's why I'm asking. Trying to learn if my impulse to blurt out Anna Freud at inopportune moments will get me into trouble. Again.
Posted by Anthony | Link to this comment | 03-17-06 2:03 PM
123: Them's the rules.
Posted by Tia | Link to this comment | 03-17-06 2:04 PM
But what if I had asked "Was your father a famous psychiatrist?" completely innocently? Is Tia supposed to think of another suitable F and say "no, I'm not Amma Frevd" or something? Or say she doesn't know?
It is all very confusing.
Posted by Anonymous | Link to this comment | 03-17-06 2:09 PM
128 was me, surprisingly.
Posted by Anthony | Link to this comment | 03-17-06 2:10 PM
I am also confused by this game.
Posted by teofilo | Link to this comment | 03-17-06 2:10 PM
No, no, alligator! Don't eat Francesca Fiore! What, you think is good? Is bad! Ah!
Posted by Standpipe Bridgeplate | Link to this comment | 03-17-06 2:12 PM
Here's what I say. Next time, we play by MAE's variation in 17, since that will make it harder for our questioners. Since the further it gets narrowed the harder it is not to ask a first order question that would describe the mystery person, should the questioner ask, innocently or no, about Anna Freud, the answerer should just concede that's who she is.
Posted by Tia | Link to this comment | 03-17-06 2:14 PM
Well, at least it's not just me.
Now all the roosters are letting me know the sun will nearly be up, and I must stop pretending to work and instead get some sleep.
Posted by Anthony | Link to this comment | 03-17-06 2:15 PM
128 makes a good point.
Posted by ben wolfson | Link to this comment | 03-17-06 2:15 PM
Oh, there wasn't even an alligator at all; it was a car chase!
Posted by ac | Link to this comment | 03-17-06 2:16 PM
134: That's what I was hoping 112 could solve. But 132 works too.
I just wanted to write a comment with lots of comment numbers. 108: 104 116.
Posted by eb | Link to this comment | 03-17-06 2:18 PM
For some reason 112 leaves me perplexed.
Cock-a-doodle-doo!
Posted by Anthony | Link to this comment | 03-17-06 2:20 PM
You say, "no I'm not Anna Freud" and that's taken to mean "I guessed you were thinking of Anna Freud" for first order purposes. Nothing said in response to a first order question should be taken to have any relevancy whatsoever to the second order question. So yes, I'm Anna Freud is still valid at the second order level.
I've never played this in a way that "No, I'm not X" for a first order answer has meant you can't later guess X at the second order. But I've also never played for 6 hours.
Posted by eb | Link to this comment | 03-17-06 2:23 PM
I'm sorry, I think I've ruined everyone's fun.
Posted by eb | Link to this comment | 03-17-06 2:30 PM
eb, you've ruined no one's fun.
Posted by Tia | Link to this comment | 03-17-06 2:31 PM
Not SB's and mine.
Posted by ac | Link to this comment | 03-17-06 2:31 PM
Well, I've partially ruined my own. This reminds me too much of how I used to enjoy capture the flag until every game seemed to turn into a dispute over the rules.
Posted by eb | Link to this comment | 03-17-06 2:37 PM
Your F.F. quotage made my day, ac. Thank you.
Posted by Standpipe Bridgeplate | Link to this comment | 03-17-06 2:39 PM
Is nothing.
Posted by ac | Link to this comment | 03-17-06 2:41 PM
You say, "no I'm not Anna Freud" and that's taken to mean "I guessed you were thinking of Anna Freud" for first order purposes. Nothing said in response to a first order question should be taken to have any relevancy whatsoever to the second order question.
In that case shouldn't the formula be "I guess you were thinking of Anna Freud" and not "I'm not Anna Freud", since the successful guess is all that matters?
Posted by ben wolfson | Link to this comment | 03-17-06 2:41 PM
Well, yeah, I vaguely remember playing this without giving the "I am/I am not" type of response for the 1st order questions.
Posted by eb | Link to this comment | 03-17-06 2:47 PM
I call shenanigans on 40 anyway.
Posted by Matt Weiner | Link to this comment | 03-18-06 9:16 AM
I'm sure they weren't 'books' as such.
Posted by Anthony | Link to this comment | 03-18-06 9:27 AM