As a facebook user, I should delurk to give my two cents. The news feed is extraordinarily creepy: anything you do, short of sending someone a private message, is collected and distributed to all of your friends. For example, if you were to list an event, everyone on your friends list sees that you've created an event right when they log in, whether or not they've been invited. If one of your friends sends another one of your friends a public message--known as writing on their wall--the message is displayed when you log onto the site. It does happen to be useful if you want to check to see if anything is new with multiple people, but I, at least, feel unclean reading it.
Laws about what the information can be used for are fine and dandy, but as anyone who has ever been stalked on the internet knows, it's more comforting to have at least some legal protection against involuntarily having a bunch of disparate information that you've provided for specific reasons or audiences gathered together in one publicly accessible place.
3: Right; as I've been saying on every blog I read that mentions this, the most irritating thing is that you can't opt out of receiving the feed. They've mostly dealt with the privacy considerations; you can opt out of having any of your information broadcast (and I have done this) but there's no way to turn off the damn feed itself, which is extremely creepy and takes up most of the screen.
I predicted that a firestorm of controversy would cause them to change the News Feed (and the Mini-News Feed) by the end of the week. I love it when I'm right.
It would be pretty funny (or something) if we all anonymously posted pictures of our cocks, and tried to guess each one's owner. Kind of like Sherry's blogparty. Kind of not.
Commentator Fact 6: the combined number of lovers of Tia and Bitch is best expressed in scientific notation. The number of lovers of Benjamin Wolfson is the inverse of that.
15: I find this comment exclusionary and sexist. You know perfectly well that we do not all have cocks.
20: Ah, false memory. In fact, I've said on a previous thread that I've had sex with fewer than a dozen men in my life. I think the number may not even hit double digits.
Seriously, the suggestion contained in 15 has "best. post. evar." written all over it. But judging from how seriously people took the Frappr thing, I don't have high hopes.
38, well, then everyone would have to get anonymous accounts, and whatnot. Think of the logistics! Maybe the logistics aren't actually prohibitive. Whatever.
42: DAMMIT! I thought I finally had the difference between "prone" and "supine" straight when I memorized the third quote listed here. Now I find that he was actually referring to women lying on their fronts? That's perverse.
The easiest way to do it would be for everyone to just send the pics to ogged, who would then post them. Ogged would know the answers, but everyone else could try to guess.
47: Are you really comfortable with ogged having that much power? My libertarian impulses are acting up. I only trust ogged to provide police and military services and maintain the roads.
Obviously, the simplest thing to do would be to set up an @unfogged.com address which would pipe all incoming emails to a script that would extract image attachments and place them, randomly named, in some directory on the server.
54: well the script would have to be written, and I'm not sure if we actually have the means to set up such an address—I know it's possible with root access but I'm not sure otherwise.
We can set up extra unfogged.com addresses, I think. Or couldn't we just set up a "unfoggedpics@gmail.com" account, post the password, and have everyone who wants to send a pic send it to ogged from that address? That way they would all be coming from the same anon account so he couldn't tell their source apart. I could not be thinking that thru right -- little brain fried.
You should definitely do this. The ladies will chant and cheer and give you bead necklaces. Randomly, after we get confirmation that you sent in a picture.
This better be good. I'm expecting at least fifteen penis participants.
ogged will also have to send an email to himself from the anon account, otherwise we'd know which one was his 'cause it wouldn't be in the "sent mail" folder.
I'm not reading 95% of the comment threads while I'm here (only online right now b/c all of our plans for the day got rained out -- yes, we're in a city with over 300 sunny days per year and it's POURING so I'm online booking stuff for the rest of our trip.) You all should really tip me off to the good threads like this via email.
I've been reassured since that post that the weirdest looking part is an under-the-skin suture that will go away. So it'll be more of a groove. I'm down with a groove.
Guys, if 'Smasher can put on a shirt, tie, and sweater just for uson a Sunday, you can surely all take your clothes off and snap pictures of yr penises.
So the notch/groove thing is basically the way the doctors have played this all along. Tell you something much worse than the truth, let you freak out, and then when they tell you the truth it seems like no big deal.
Perhaps not the highest form of medical ethics, but apparently effective.
Question: in the great penis picture post, are the guys who send pics going to admit they've done so *at all*? So the identification guesses are happening within a fixed set of possibilities? Or are the possible identifications to include all potential posters and any exhibitionist lurkers who might be out there?
Because obviously it would be way more fun if it were the former.
I like how a post that's about how random information on the internet can come back to haunt you has now turned into one where we're encouraging people to send in pictures of their cocks.
Well, I'm saying that pushing them past the "send in the picture threshold" is possible, but the "yeah, one of those penises is mine" threshold might be a bridge too far.
But I think we should just continue making fun of them until they do it.
79: Amen. Also, who's to say that Unfogged won't follow Thefacebook's lead and start automatically sending everybody an RSS feed of cock pictures with no prior warning?
If we're dealing with actual photographs then there's going to be all kinds of considerations of lighting, backdrop, deep focus or otherwise...I mean, no expense will be spared. I really want to win that car.
For example, makeup. This question becomes relevant again.
Apparently mailboxes take around 15 minutes to be activated, but after that time mail to c0ck at unfogged.com will have images stripped and deposited in a publically viewable directory.
No one said 78 wasn't hilarious. I was merely pointing out that it was one of those make-fun-of-the-other-guy things y'all do in order to hide your own embarrassment.
Well, maybe the publically viewable directory's location shouldn't be announced until someone has confirmed that a critical mass (say, eight cocks) has convened.
103: Although soft serve would be awesome (and transgressive!) I think the literature confirms that the common cock-metric is that of erect ones, and a bunch of pictures of flaccid penises would probably give less information than we were hoping for.
Some of you prospective cock photographers -- cockarazzi? -- must be familiar with the (possibly apocryphal) circle jerk prank. You know, the one in which some hapless victim is induced into participating in group self-abuse in the dark, and then when the lights come on, he's the only one with his dick in his hand. I'm not suggesting that, say, Ogged would secretly email all the men but one, let's call him Teofilo, leaving one solitary and thus readily identifiable cock in the gallery. But in light of recent cautionary tales of online privacy, a person might want to be careful.
I wish I'd been able to suggest that to Teo before he went to bed. Oh well, the kid's gotta grow up sometime.
Speaking of Facebook, anyone else been following the "If this group reaches 100,000 my girlfriend will have a threesome" saga? Kind of amazing, especially since a) it hit 100,000 in three days, b) it's almost at 300,000 (the point at which the guy promises to publish photos) and c) the participants appear to be roughly split between men and women. Kind of awesome, too.
I'm not good at discerning between, "Wait, are we really doing this?" and "Wait, are we really doing this?" so someone let me know if we're really doing this. I can think of no reason not to, assuming you don't have your unfogged alias tattooed on your member.
Prediction: the directory ends up filled with 50 pictures of penises apo downloaded from the internet, and three real pictures from people who end up feeling stupid.
Haven't read the thread, but now have to say that there actually was a pic of my vagina on my old blog, but heavily photoshopped to become an abstract.
I'm not good at discerning between, "Wait, are we really doing this?" and "Wait, are we really doing this?" so someone let me know if we're really doing this.
Ok, I've got a tattoo that says "Under Milk Wood, set in the fictional Welsh village of Llareggub, was the first of Dylan Thomas' radio plays to be recorded" (it's the first line of my thesis) and in a couple of minutes of thinking about Madeleine Albright chewing a wasp I'll be ready to go.
Actually, 'dinna' is some kind of wierd movie bollocks. No-one says 'dinna'.*
Just about everyone pronounces it 'dinnae' with the final syllable to rhyme with 'way' only shorter.
* Actually, before someone points out that their Great-Uncle Hamish says it that way, there probably are some old men who live on farms near Aberdeen and who speak Doric who say it that way, but the basic point still holds.
Thanks ttaM -- I pondered the choice between dinna and dinnae but since I have never heard someone speaking Scots it came down to thinking I've read "I dinna ken" more than "I dinnae ken". Google gives 18000 hits for the formaer, 500 for the latter.
(The top Google hit for "I dinnae ken" is to the following dialog, found at Urban Dictionary:
Hamish: "Di ye ken that lassie tha' lives doon the road?"
Zander: "Naw I dinnae ken her"
Hamish: "Aye ye dae! Ken she's the wan wi the big diddies like?"
Zander: "Aw, I dae ken her noo."
I've always said it as 'oo', however, the OED clearly states that it's 'yoo'. Which makes me very much not an authority on the pronunciation of latinate words.
OED says, "neuter gerundive of pud{emac}re to cause shame, ashame, lit. ‘that of which one ought to be ashamed’". Also, that the word refers to genitals, "especially those of a woman". Excellent citation: "The value [for pruritus] of a solution of cocaine freely brushed over the pudendum..is unquestionable." -- 1893 T. M. MADDEN Clin. Gynæcol. -- Does "pruritus" mean what I think it means?
I always thought it came from a Latin root because it is definitely part of the slang associated with Latinos on the US mainland. Possibly because it sounds like "mami" and "papi".
I'm surprised that "punani" is supposed to be Hawaiian. There's a Jamaican dancehall song called "Punanny," by Admiral Bailey. I would have guessed its origin to be African.
202: Might have some relationship to Gaelic, too. AFAIK the word in Irish and Scottish Gaelic both is bod, pronounced like "budh". See the usual old dictionary dance here. And the b in the Gaelic languages is more, is plosive the right word? more p-like than in English.
Well he certainly didn't say "Nobody can pick his own cock out of a lineup!" -- he's just talking about himself. I don't see what would be unreasonable about Chappelle and some other people not being able to recognize their own cocks and a different group being able to.
That seems perfectly reasonable. But how large are those two groups? Are they about even, or does one have a clear majority? As I said, I imagine I belong in the former, with Chappelle.
Hold your horses, clown. This isn't exactly the sort of project I'm going to undertake here at work, and it'll take me a while to dig up the wide-angle, anyway. Is there a deadline for submissions? (How long will the email address be live?)
Dear persons who have sent in pictures of a chamber of commerce building, chocolate chip pancakes and sausage on a stick, an owl, and glue: those don't count.
You know, the idea that a man couldn't pick his own cock out of a lineup is just pure bunk. Any healthy adult has had more than enough experience with their own junk to know it from another's.
Heh.
Posted by FL | Link to this comment | 09-10-06 8:52 PM
I'll be here all week.
Posted by ogged | Link to this comment | 09-10-06 8:53 PM
As a facebook user, I should delurk to give my two cents. The news feed is extraordinarily creepy: anything you do, short of sending someone a private message, is collected and distributed to all of your friends. For example, if you were to list an event, everyone on your friends list sees that you've created an event right when they log in, whether or not they've been invited. If one of your friends sends another one of your friends a public message--known as writing on their wall--the message is displayed when you log onto the site. It does happen to be useful if you want to check to see if anything is new with multiple people, but I, at least, feel unclean reading it.
Posted by gea | Link to this comment | 09-10-06 9:05 PM
Laws about what the information can be used for are fine and dandy, but as anyone who has ever been stalked on the internet knows, it's more comforting to have at least some legal protection against involuntarily having a bunch of disparate information that you've provided for specific reasons or audiences gathered together in one publicly accessible place.
Posted by bitchphd | Link to this comment | 09-10-06 9:09 PM
3: Right; as I've been saying on every blog I read that mentions this, the most irritating thing is that you can't opt out of receiving the feed. They've mostly dealt with the privacy considerations; you can opt out of having any of your information broadcast (and I have done this) but there's no way to turn off the damn feed itself, which is extremely creepy and takes up most of the screen.
Posted by teofilo | Link to this comment | 09-10-06 9:10 PM
"Warren St. John" would be a great porn name.
Posted by mike d | Link to this comment | 09-10-06 9:12 PM
I predicted that a firestorm of controversy would cause them to change the News Feed (and the Mini-News Feed) by the end of the week. I love it when I'm right.
Posted by Anarch | Link to this comment | 09-10-06 9:32 PM
Sorry, I can't engage with this conversation. I'm on Cregzlst, posting ur n00dz.
Posted by FL | Link to this comment | 09-10-06 9:33 PM
They haven't really changed it much, though, just tweaked it a little.
Posted by teofilo | Link to this comment | 09-10-06 9:33 PM
I'd love a concordance of what is known about unfogged commentators. I think Apostropher is the one who likes bacon.
Posted by baa | Link to this comment | 09-10-06 9:34 PM
I believe someone once floated the idea of a wiki FAQ filled with disinformation.
Posted by teofilo | Link to this comment | 09-10-06 9:35 PM
IIRC, baa hearts torturing babies.
Posted by Michael | Link to this comment | 09-10-06 9:35 PM
I'd love a concordance of what is known about unfogged commentators.
This would be immense. And not just because it would contain Labs's cock.
Posted by ogged | Link to this comment | 09-10-06 9:37 PM
Ogged is prissy and only sexually attracted to women who remind him of boy scouts.
Posted by Michael | Link to this comment | 09-10-06 9:39 PM
It would be pretty funny (or something) if we all anonymously posted pictures of our cocks, and tried to guess each one's owner. Kind of like Sherry's blogparty. Kind of not.
Posted by ogged | Link to this comment | 09-10-06 9:40 PM
Ogged, that's, amazingly, the gayest thing you've written yet.
Posted by Michael | Link to this comment | 09-10-06 9:41 PM
Michael spells worse than Saiselgy and his ass gives Chopper needs.
Posted by ben wolfson | Link to this comment | 09-10-06 9:41 PM
Would we put in a standard object of reference? I suppose not, or Labs would, of course, be no challenge.
Posted by Michael | Link to this comment | 09-10-06 9:42 PM
15: I wouldn't want to put you all to shame.
Posted by ben wolfson | Link to this comment | 09-10-06 9:42 PM
Commentator Fact 6: the combined number of lovers of Tia and Bitch is best expressed in scientific notation. The number of lovers of Benjamin Wolfson is the inverse of that.
Posted by Michael | Link to this comment | 09-10-06 9:43 PM
Michael probably won't date uneducated women, but his slippery grasp of parallel construction makes it impossible to be sure.
Posted by ogged | Link to this comment | 09-10-06 9:44 PM
15: I find this comment exclusionary and sexist. You know perfectly well that we do not all have cocks.
20: Ah, false memory. In fact, I've said on a previous thread that I've had sex with fewer than a dozen men in my life. I think the number may not even hit double digits.
Posted by bitchphd | Link to this comment | 09-10-06 9:45 PM
15: I wouldn't want to put you all to shame.
Since when did "girl27" become synonymous with "you all"?
Posted by ogged | Link to this comment | 09-10-06 9:46 PM
The innocent have nothing to hide.
Posted by Adam Kotsko | Link to this comment | 09-10-06 9:48 PM
Sorry, I should slug these all with "Fact!"
Fact! Ben Wolfson has slept with all our mothers.
Fact! Teofilo has not.
Posted by ogged | Link to this comment | 09-10-06 9:48 PM
Fact! Apostropher slept naked while the house he was in was burgled.
Posted by ogged | Link to this comment | 09-10-06 9:50 PM
15: Weirdly, I had a conversation IRL with someone not three hours ago in which he said that the men of Unfogged should post pictures of their dicks.
Posted by dagger aleph | Link to this comment | 09-10-06 9:53 PM
That doesn't seem weird at all, da.
Posted by ogged | Link to this comment | 09-10-06 9:58 PM
I have, like, thirty goddamned dicks, so I'll just put up a page on Encyclopedia Dramatica.
Posted by FL | Link to this comment | 09-10-06 9:59 PM
da, was that person ogged? If not, that's pretty weird.
Posted by FL | Link to this comment | 09-10-06 10:00 PM
The women can just send photos of themselves, nude, directly to me.
Posted by ben wolfson | Link to this comment | 09-10-06 10:00 PM
Fact! Profgrrrrl panty-blogged, maybe not just for us, but when she knew we were looking.
Posted by ogged | Link to this comment | 09-10-06 10:08 PM
i don't really get the problem iwth this, but i don't really have much posted on my facebook account.
Posted by yoyo | Link to this comment | 09-10-06 10:09 PM
30: no, a friend who lurks occasionally.
Seriously, the suggestion contained in 15 has "best. post. evar." written all over it. But judging from how seriously people took the Frappr thing, I don't have high hopes.
Posted by dagger aleph | Link to this comment | 09-10-06 10:13 PM
How could it really be done anonymously? The pictures would have to come from those in a position to have pictures, if ye ken.
Posted by ben wolfson | Link to this comment | 09-10-06 10:15 PM
How could it really be done anonymously? The pictures would have to come from those in a position to have pictures, if ye ken.
And that position would be prone? Anyone can achieve that one, except those of us in wheelchairs (less than 50%?)
Posted by Cryptic Ned | Link to this comment | 09-10-06 10:18 PM
I don't ken.
Posted by dagger aleph | Link to this comment | 09-10-06 10:18 PM
How could it really be done anonymously?
What do you mean? You mean something more anonymous than sending from anonymous accounts?
Posted by ogged | Link to this comment | 09-10-06 10:20 PM
So everyone sends their pic to Ogged, and he posts them anonymously. Easy.
Posted by bitchphd | Link to this comment | 09-10-06 10:20 PM
judging from how seriously people took the Frappr thing
It's a problem when so many people are pseudonymous.
Posted by ogged | Link to this comment | 09-10-06 10:20 PM
So everyone sends their pic to Ogged, and he posts them anonymously. Easy.
The problem with that is we have no idea which anonymous Ogged is doing the posting.
Posted by Cryptic Ned | Link to this comment | 09-10-06 10:21 PM
36: supine. prone is on your stomach.
Posted by Matt Weiner | Link to this comment | 09-10-06 10:23 PM
38, well, then everyone would have to get anonymous accounts, and whatnot. Think of the logistics! Maybe the logistics aren't actually prohibitive. Whatever.
Posted by ben wolfson | Link to this comment | 09-10-06 10:26 PM
One can also take a picture of one's tripod with a tripod. If ye ken.
Posted by dagger aleph | Link to this comment | 09-10-06 10:27 PM
Wolfson's just trying to make sure that we remain three removes from the cocks.
Posted by eb | Link to this comment | 09-10-06 10:27 PM
42: DAMMIT! I thought I finally had the difference between "prone" and "supine" straight when I memorized the third quote listed here. Now I find that he was actually referring to women lying on their fronts? That's perverse.
Posted by Cryptic Ned | Link to this comment | 09-10-06 10:27 PM
The easiest way to do it would be for everyone to just send the pics to ogged, who would then post them. Ogged would know the answers, but everyone else could try to guess.
Posted by teofilo | Link to this comment | 09-10-06 10:28 PM
Ok, so Wolfson has something to hide. His cock has a mustache, or something.
Posted by ogged | Link to this comment | 09-10-06 10:29 PM
47: Are you really comfortable with ogged having that much power? My libertarian impulses are acting up. I only trust ogged to provide police and military services and maintain the roads.
Posted by Cryptic Ned | Link to this comment | 09-10-06 10:29 PM
Persons with shoddy wares might be content to give the goods away for free, but I don't see why I should.
Posted by ben wolfson | Link to this comment | 09-10-06 10:29 PM
Most people here don't even use their real names. Anyone knowing the answers seems like a no go.
Posted by gswift | Link to this comment | 09-10-06 10:30 PM
You fucking bunch of pussies. I'd do it, and I'm a girl. Butch up.
Posted by bitchphd | Link to this comment | 09-10-06 10:31 PM
Obviously, the simplest thing to do would be to set up an @unfogged.com address which would pipe all incoming emails to a script that would extract image attachments and place them, randomly named, in some directory on the server.
Posted by ben wolfson | Link to this comment | 09-10-06 10:31 PM
53: So what are you waiting for?
Posted by teofilo | Link to this comment | 09-10-06 10:33 PM
This is awesome. It must be done.
Posted by m. leblanc | Link to this comment | 09-10-06 10:33 PM
52: I would totally do this.
Posted by teofilo | Link to this comment | 09-10-06 10:33 PM
In all seriousness, it might be pretty easy pick some out. I am thinking particuarly of our esteemed commenter with the red hair.
Guess apo's going to have to start shaving his balls again.
I think that means you all need to shave your balls. Get crackin'.
Posted by m. leblanc | Link to this comment | 09-10-06 10:35 PM
54: well the script would have to be written, and I'm not sure if we actually have the means to set up such an address—I know it's possible with root access but I'm not sure otherwise.
Posted by ben wolfson | Link to this comment | 09-10-06 10:35 PM
We'll have to agree on the camera's distance from the member, the angle of the shot, and the focal length. No tricks.
Posted by ogged | Link to this comment | 09-10-06 10:36 PM
Guess apo's going to have to start shaving his balls again.
How the hell would you know that he ever stopped?
Posted by ogged | Link to this comment | 09-10-06 10:38 PM
We can set up extra unfogged.com addresses, I think. Or couldn't we just set up a "unfoggedpics@gmail.com" account, post the password, and have everyone who wants to send a pic send it to ogged from that address? That way they would all be coming from the same anon account so he couldn't tell their source apart. I could not be thinking that thru right -- little brain fried.
Posted by Becks | Link to this comment | 09-10-06 10:38 PM
You should definitely do this. The ladies will chant and cheer and give you bead necklaces. Randomly, after we get confirmation that you sent in a picture.
Posted by Megan | Link to this comment | 09-10-06 10:39 PM
No tricks
This from the guy who made his scar look bigger to garner more sympathy.
Posted by Becks | Link to this comment | 09-10-06 10:39 PM
I love that Becks chimes in from Australia with logistics.
Posted by m. leblanc | Link to this comment | 09-10-06 10:39 PM
I'll be totally annoyed if I miss this.
Posted by Becks | Link to this comment | 09-10-06 10:40 PM
This from the guy who made his scar look bigger to garner more sympathy.
It was kinda sad how it went from looking like it was two feet long to just eight inches.
Posted by ogged | Link to this comment | 09-10-06 10:42 PM
This better be good. I'm expecting at least fifteen penis participants.
ogged will also have to send an email to himself from the anon account, otherwise we'd know which one was his 'cause it wouldn't be in the "sent mail" folder.
Posted by m. leblanc | Link to this comment | 09-10-06 10:42 PM
I'm not reading 95% of the comment threads while I'm here (only online right now b/c all of our plans for the day got rained out -- yes, we're in a city with over 300 sunny days per year and it's POURING so I'm online booking stuff for the rest of our trip.) You all should really tip me off to the good threads like this via email.
Posted by Becks | Link to this comment | 09-10-06 10:43 PM
It was kinda sad how it went from looking like it was two feet long to just eight inches.
I wonder if a penis pump could be used to pull out that notch, the same way body shops pull a dent out of a fender.
Posted by gswift | Link to this comment | 09-10-06 10:46 PM
I've been reassured since that post that the weirdest looking part is an under-the-skin suture that will go away. So it'll be more of a groove. I'm down with a groove.
Posted by ogged | Link to this comment | 09-10-06 10:48 PM
Guys, if 'Smasher can put on a shirt, tie, and sweater just for us on a Sunday, you can surely all take your clothes off and snap pictures of yr penises.
That is all
Posted by m. leblanc | Link to this comment | 09-10-06 10:48 PM
I'm expecting at least fifteen penis participants.
No wonder you're popular with the fellas.
Posted by Armsmasher | Link to this comment | 09-10-06 10:49 PM
You all should really tip me off to the good threads like this via email.
Becks, go vacate. Go flirt with the bellhop or something.
Posted by ogged | Link to this comment | 09-10-06 10:50 PM
So the notch/groove thing is basically the way the doctors have played this all along. Tell you something much worse than the truth, let you freak out, and then when they tell you the truth it seems like no big deal.
Perhaps not the highest form of medical ethics, but apparently effective.
Posted by bitchphd | Link to this comment | 09-10-06 10:50 PM
Question: in the great penis picture post, are the guys who send pics going to admit they've done so *at all*? So the identification guesses are happening within a fixed set of possibilities? Or are the possible identifications to include all potential posters and any exhibitionist lurkers who might be out there?
Because obviously it would be way more fun if it were the former.
Posted by bitchphd | Link to this comment | 09-10-06 10:52 PM
If they're too pussy to even send in the pics (except teo), they're probably too pussy to own up to having sent one in.
But I, too, think they should.
Posted by m. leblanc | Link to this comment | 09-10-06 10:55 PM
That makes no sense. If they don't send 'em in, there's nothing to own up to.
But I agree with you that at this point, Teo is the man.
Posted by bitchphd | Link to this comment | 09-10-06 10:57 PM
Teo just wants someone to see that thing before he dies.
Posted by gswift | Link to this comment | 09-10-06 10:59 PM
I like how a post that's about how random information on the internet can come back to haunt you has now turned into one where we're encouraging people to send in pictures of their cocks.
Posted by bitchphd | Link to this comment | 09-10-06 10:59 PM
Well, I'm saying that pushing them past the "send in the picture threshold" is possible, but the "yeah, one of those penises is mine" threshold might be a bridge too far.
But I think we should just continue making fun of them until they do it.
Pussies.
Posted by m. leblanc | Link to this comment | 09-10-06 10:59 PM
Gswift is just saying that to deflect attention from his being too ashamed to let even one person see his.
Posted by bitchphd | Link to this comment | 09-10-06 11:00 PM
Ogged's Persian, so I'm guessing more of a mocha hue, and uncut.
Posted by gswift | Link to this comment | 09-10-06 11:01 PM
79: Amen. Also, who's to say that Unfogged won't follow Thefacebook's lead and start automatically sending everybody an RSS feed of cock pictures with no prior warning?
Posted by Cryptic Ned | Link to this comment | 09-10-06 11:01 PM
Making fun, or egging on, depending.
Think pussies, guys.
(Unless you're Labs or McManly or Stroll.)
Posted by bitchphd | Link to this comment | 09-10-06 11:02 PM
82: Nope. Muslims circumcize too.
Posted by m. leblanc | Link to this comment | 09-10-06 11:02 PM
82 really sounds like you're describing a cat.
Posted by bitchphd | Link to this comment | 09-10-06 11:03 PM
I don't think I can set up an email alias the way I thought I could, but maybe there's a panel-based solution I'm not thinking of.
The script works, though.
Posted by ben wolfson | Link to this comment | 09-10-06 11:03 PM
But if Teo is the only participant, it kind of takes the guesswork out of the whole thing.
Posted by dagger aleph | Link to this comment | 09-10-06 11:03 PM
I don't have access to a digital camera that I'm aware of. I think to be egalitarian we should just scan them directly in from flatbed scanners.
Posted by Cryptic Ned | Link to this comment | 09-10-06 11:04 PM
Gswift is just saying that to deflect attention from his being too ashamed to let even one person see his.
I freely admit, this is something I'm unlikely to do.
Posted by gswift | Link to this comment | 09-10-06 11:05 PM
uncut
Muslims cut, and I don't just mean the heads off infidels.
And pay no attention to the ladies, 78 was awesome.
Posted by ogged | Link to this comment | 09-10-06 11:05 PM
89: That would actually solve the distance and angle problem, but I think fewer people have scanners than cameras.
Posted by m. leblanc | Link to this comment | 09-10-06 11:06 PM
If we're dealing with actual photographs then there's going to be all kinds of considerations of lighting, backdrop, deep focus or otherwise...I mean, no expense will be spared. I really want to win that car.
For example, makeup. This question becomes relevant again.
Posted by Cryptic Ned | Link to this comment | 09-10-06 11:09 PM
Apparently mailboxes take around 15 minutes to be activated, but after that time mail to c0ck at unfogged.com will have images stripped and deposited in a publically viewable directory.
Posted by ben wolfson | Link to this comment | 09-10-06 11:10 PM
No one said 78 wasn't hilarious. I was merely pointing out that it was one of those make-fun-of-the-other-guy things y'all do in order to hide your own embarrassment.
Posted by bitchphd | Link to this comment | 09-10-06 11:10 PM
That's c zero c k. Despite the name, the pictures can actually be of anything.
Posted by ben wolfson | Link to this comment | 09-10-06 11:11 PM
whats the big deal of sending a cock pic?
Posted by yoyo | Link to this comment | 09-10-06 11:11 PM
Hopefully, no one I TA, or apply for a job with, will ever come across this thread, which is already probably damaging enough.
Posted by ben wolfson | Link to this comment | 09-10-06 11:13 PM
96: Subtle.
Posted by bitchphd | Link to this comment | 09-10-06 11:13 PM
If the job you're applying for involves quick and innovative problem-solving, I think it'd probably help you.
Posted by m. leblanc | Link to this comment | 09-10-06 11:15 PM
The real problem, obviously, is getting a critical mass. Who'd want to be the lone cock-barer? And who'd cop to it, when he's the first?
Posted by ben wolfson | Link to this comment | 09-10-06 11:16 PM
Well, maybe the publically viewable directory's location shouldn't be announced until someone has confirmed that a critical mass (say, eight cocks) has convened.
Posted by m. leblanc | Link to this comment | 09-10-06 11:17 PM
Should there be a consensus about hard or soft serve? Or is that to be left to the artistic vision of the photographer(s)?
Posted by bitchphd | Link to this comment | 09-10-06 11:18 PM
102: I'll volunteer.
Posted by bitchphd | Link to this comment | 09-10-06 11:18 PM
I was merely pointing out that it was one of those make-fun-of-the-other-guy things y'all do in order to hide your own embarrassment.
Sometimes you gotta give another guy shit just becuse the opportunity is too good to pass by.
Posted by gswift | Link to this comment | 09-10-06 11:18 PM
92: A lot of people could scan them at work.
Posted by dagger aleph | Link to this comment | 09-10-06 11:19 PM
103: Although soft serve would be awesome (and transgressive!) I think the literature confirms that the common cock-metric is that of erect ones, and a bunch of pictures of flaccid penises would probably give less information than we were hoping for.
Posted by m. leblanc | Link to this comment | 09-10-06 11:21 PM
107: So this is all about measuring? I'm disappointed in you people.
Posted by Cryptic Ned | Link to this comment | 09-10-06 11:23 PM
No, Ned, it's about personality.
Posted by m. leblanc | Link to this comment | 09-10-06 11:24 PM
The thread seems to have fallen very quiet. I can only assume that everyone is off busily photographing themselves.
Posted by bitchphd | Link to this comment | 09-10-06 11:25 PM
103: Hard. I can't even believe there's any question about this.
Posted by dagger aleph | Link to this comment | 09-10-06 11:25 PM
Wait! Possible bug encountered!
Posted by ben wolfson | Link to this comment | 09-10-06 11:26 PM
109: Or, to be accurate, it's about matching up personality with depersonalized cock, if I'm not mistaken.
Which is one reason I kinda like the idea of leaving the presentation up to the presenter.
Posted by bitchphd | Link to this comment | 09-10-06 11:27 PM
I am going to be so very embarrassed for this blog if you crazy people actually go through with this.
Posted by ogged | Link to this comment | 09-10-06 11:27 PM
What do you mean, "you crazy people." You're sending one in, too.
Posted by m. leblanc | Link to this comment | 09-10-06 11:28 PM
We're still chatting. All the guys must be off taking pictures. Why don't they just use the same cock pictures they use when answering Craigslist ads?
Ogged, why are you hating? The human body is beautiful and natural, and we would like to see pictures of your cocks.
Posted by Megan | Link to this comment | 09-10-06 11:30 PM
Wait! Possible bug encountered!
It may look like a bug NOW, but when it gets erect...never mind. I'm sick of explaining that to everyone I meet.
Goodnight, when I wake up hopefully this thread will have been a dream.
Posted by Cryptic Ned | Link to this comment | 09-10-06 11:30 PM
Ok, seems to work.
Posted by ben wolfson | Link to this comment | 09-10-06 11:35 PM
Ogged's 114 doesn't seem to acknowledge that this was his idea in the first place.
Posted by teofilo | Link to this comment | 09-10-06 11:35 PM
So are we actually doing this?
Posted by teofilo | Link to this comment | 09-10-06 11:38 PM
119: I don't think he expected it to be discussed in a way that suggested seriousness. I agree with 114. And I meant to include this link in 45.
Posted by eb | Link to this comment | 09-10-06 11:42 PM
Ah, but the comment in that link was written before the infusion of more womanly content, so its "we" is no longer properly representative.
Posted by bitchphd | Link to this comment | 09-10-06 11:45 PM
88 has become reality!
Posted by Cryptic Ned | Link to this comment | 09-10-06 11:46 PM
123: Was there ever any doubt?
Posted by teofilo | Link to this comment | 09-10-06 11:47 PM
Well, anyway, everything is, while not perfectly perfect, pretty good on the receiving end, so to speak.
Someone sent in a picture of Foghorn Leghorn.
Posted by ben wolfson | Link to this comment | 09-10-06 11:48 PM
I don't see how 122 matters. Unless there are representativeness standards for references to (former) in jokes now?
Posted by eb | Link to this comment | 09-10-06 11:50 PM
It doesn't, I was just being an ass.
Posted by bitchphd | Link to this comment | 09-10-06 11:52 PM
This way madness lies.
Posted by washerdreyer | Link to this comment | 09-10-06 11:54 PM
Holy crap! Someone(s) actually sent in picture(s)!
Posted by Becks | Link to this comment | 09-10-06 11:56 PM
I can't bring myself to look at them. One of them loaded as far as for me to tell that it really was a picture of a cock and I had to shut the window.
Posted by Becks | Link to this comment | 09-10-06 11:57 PM
Are they of penises???
Posted by m. leblanc | Link to this comment | 09-10-06 11:57 PM
And so the embarrassment begins.
Posted by eb | Link to this comment | 09-10-06 11:58 PM
This blog wins the internet.
Posted by m. leblanc | Link to this comment | 09-10-06 11:58 PM
Way to snoop, becks.
Posted by ben wolfson | Link to this comment | 09-10-06 11:58 PM
Ah, crap. never mind. It's not a homemade pic. Someone's messing with us
Posted by Becks | Link to this comment | 09-11-06 12:00 AM
I think picture-submitters should write www.unfogged.com on their cocks in magic marker to prevent the submission of fakes.
Posted by m. leblanc | Link to this comment | 09-11-06 12:02 AM
Wait, we're branding them now? This is disturbing.
Posted by bitchphd | Link to this comment | 09-11-06 12:02 AM
That was a joke.
Posted by m. leblanc | Link to this comment | 09-11-06 12:04 AM
I'd better go to bed. I'll see how this turns out tomorrow.
Posted by teofilo | Link to this comment | 09-11-06 12:05 AM
Goodnight, all.
Posted by teofilo | Link to this comment | 09-11-06 12:05 AM
'Night, Teo. Hope the magic marker comes off in the shower.
Posted by bitchphd | Link to this comment | 09-11-06 12:06 AM
I'm so not encouraging this project, by the way, as I know what the next logical one would be and I'm not posting a picture of my tits.
Posted by Becks | Link to this comment | 09-11-06 12:28 AM
Actually, I think it would be even worse than tits, since tits aren't exactly the functional equivalent of cocks.
Posted by bitchphd | Link to this comment | 09-11-06 12:30 AM
Tits are a good place to start, though.
Posted by ben wolfson | Link to this comment | 09-11-06 12:31 AM
re: 144
Kissing, dude. You start with kissing. You're moving way too fast....
Posted by nattarGcM ttaM | Link to this comment | 09-11-06 12:33 AM
I am not writing "unfogged.com" on my boobs with magic marker, I am sorry.
Posted by bitchphd | Link to this comment | 09-11-06 12:34 AM
But you'd write it on your functional equivalents?
Posted by ben wolfson | Link to this comment | 09-11-06 12:34 AM
Why bother when you've already got it tattooed, right?
Posted by Becks | Link to this comment | 09-11-06 12:35 AM
I hate you both.
Posted by bitchphd | Link to this comment | 09-11-06 12:36 AM
Some of you prospective cock photographers -- cockarazzi? -- must be familiar with the (possibly apocryphal) circle jerk prank. You know, the one in which some hapless victim is induced into participating in group self-abuse in the dark, and then when the lights come on, he's the only one with his dick in his hand. I'm not suggesting that, say, Ogged would secretly email all the men but one, let's call him Teofilo, leaving one solitary and thus readily identifiable cock in the gallery. But in light of recent cautionary tales of online privacy, a person might want to be careful.
I wish I'd been able to suggest that to Teo before he went to bed. Oh well, the kid's gotta grow up sometime.
Posted by Jesus McQueen | Link to this comment | 09-11-06 12:55 AM
Speaking of Facebook, anyone else been following the "If this group reaches 100,000 my girlfriend will have a threesome" saga? Kind of amazing, especially since a) it hit 100,000 in three days, b) it's almost at 300,000 (the point at which the guy promises to publish photos) and c) the participants appear to be roughly split between men and women. Kind of awesome, too.
Posted by Anarch | Link to this comment | 09-11-06 1:42 AM
Wow. I totally thought I'd hit refresh before posting that. Whoops.
Posted by Anarch | Link to this comment | 09-11-06 1:47 AM
I love you guys because you're all insane.
Posted by alameida | Link to this comment | 09-11-06 2:37 AM
Y'all wait just a sec, okay?
/runs out to get fisheye lens for camera
Posted by Gaijin Biker | Link to this comment | 09-11-06 2:42 AM
This is hilarious.
I'm not good at discerning between, "Wait, are we really doing this?" and "Wait, are we really doing this?" so someone let me know if we're really doing this. I can think of no reason not to, assuming you don't have your unfogged alias tattooed on your member.
Prediction: the directory ends up filled with 50 pictures of penises apo downloaded from the internet, and three real pictures from people who end up feeling stupid.
Posted by mrh | Link to this comment | 09-11-06 5:02 AM
Haven't read the thread, but now have to say that there actually was a pic of my vagina on my old blog, but heavily photoshopped to become an abstract.
Posted by Tia | Link to this comment | 09-11-06 5:36 AM
I'm not good at discerning between, "Wait, are we really doing this?" and "Wait, are we really doing this?" so someone let me know if we're really doing this.
This was me in October of 2002.
Posted by strasmangelo jones | Link to this comment | 09-11-06 5:55 AM
37: "don't" s/b "dinna"
Posted by Clownæsthesiologist | Link to this comment | 09-11-06 6:00 AM
Jesus. Okay, so I'm glad Buck doesn't read the blog. If pictures get posted, can it at least be in some fashion where it will be easy to not see them?
And again, Jesus.
Posted by LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 09-11-06 6:07 AM
How about an artist's rendering?
Posted by Clownæsthesiologist | Link to this comment | 09-11-06 6:09 AM
I love you lot.
Posted by asilon | Link to this comment | 09-11-06 6:31 AM
You know that if we do this, I'm just going to send in a photoshop blending Jason Fortuny with my cock.
Posted by FL | Link to this comment | 09-11-06 6:35 AM
Ok, I've got a tattoo that says "Under Milk Wood, set in the fictional Welsh village of Llareggub, was the first of Dylan Thomas' radio plays to be recorded" (it's the first line of my thesis) and in a couple of minutes of thinking about Madeleine Albright chewing a wasp I'll be ready to go.
Posted by dsquared | Link to this comment | 09-11-06 6:41 AM
Left out the o to google-proof your member?
Posted by I don't pay | Link to this comment | 09-11-06 6:44 AM
Messed up the coding, sorry.
Posted by I don't pay | Link to this comment | 09-11-06 6:45 AM
re: 158
Actually, 'dinna' is some kind of wierd movie bollocks. No-one says 'dinna'.*
Just about everyone pronounces it 'dinnae' with the final syllable to rhyme with 'way' only shorter.
* Actually, before someone points out that their Great-Uncle Hamish says it that way, there probably are some old men who live on farms near Aberdeen and who speak Doric who say it that way, but the basic point still holds.
Posted by nattarGcM ttaM | Link to this comment | 09-11-06 7:07 AM
Thanks ttaM -- I pondered the choice between dinna and dinnae but since I have never heard someone speaking Scots it came down to thinking I've read "I dinna ken" more than "I dinnae ken". Google gives 18000 hits for the formaer, 500 for the latter.
Posted by Clownæsthesiologist | Link to this comment | 09-11-06 7:12 AM
(The top Google hit for "I dinnae ken" is to the following dialog, found at Urban Dictionary:
Posted by Clownæsthesiologist | Link to this comment | 09-11-06 7:21 AM
re: 167
Yeah, that's because 90% of the 'fake Scots' on the internet is written by non-speakers. However, the correct pronunciation is here:
http://www.mcgrattan.f2s.com/ken.wav
Sound quality is poor but the mic on my MP3 player is rubbish.
Posted by nattarGcM ttaM | Link to this comment | 09-11-06 7:25 AM
re: 168
Ah, the sophisticated stylings of my native tongue.
Posted by nattarGcM ttaM | Link to this comment | 09-11-06 7:28 AM
166: My grandparents were from rural Aberdeenshire (and thus speaking of the Doric), but they said 'dinnae' too.
Posted by Nakku | Link to this comment | 09-11-06 7:32 AM
It hardly needs saying that I'd participate in the logical sequel.
Posted by Ttam R. | Link to this comment | 09-11-06 7:43 AM
You mean the one referenced in 142? How?
Posted by Clownæsthesiologist | Link to this comment | 09-11-06 7:54 AM
162 conjures a nice image of Labs using his cock as a stab blender... on Jason Fortuny's face.
Posted by Nakku | Link to this comment | 09-11-06 7:56 AM
The one referenced in 143.
Posted by Ttam R. | Link to this comment | 09-11-06 8:01 AM
The one referenced in 142, I don't know why everyone's kicking about it, Apo did it already.
Posted by Ttam R. | Link to this comment | 09-11-06 8:02 AM
I would just like to say that I highly approve of the word "rubbish" as adjective.
Posted by m. leblanc | Link to this comment | 09-11-06 8:06 AM
Ttam is planning to expose the pudenda of his psyche.
Posted by Clownæsthesiologist | Link to this comment | 09-11-06 8:08 AM
177 -- looks more like a predicate nominative to me.
Posted by Clownæsthesiologist | Link to this comment | 09-11-06 8:09 AM
BTW .rM nattarGcM -- is the 'u' in 'pudenda' pronounced 'oo' or 'yoo'?
Posted by Clownæsthesiologist | Link to this comment | 09-11-06 8:14 AM
It's not like you haven't already seen pictures of my pussy.
Posted by Ttam R. | Link to this comment | 09-11-06 8:17 AM
I say "yoo". Otherwise you'd have a poo-denda, which doesn't sound very appealing.
Posted by asilon | Link to this comment | 09-11-06 8:20 AM
re: 180
I've always said it as 'oo', however, the OED clearly states that it's 'yoo'. Which makes me very much not an authority on the pronunciation of latinate words.
Posted by nattarGcM ttaM | Link to this comment | 09-11-06 8:22 AM
Otherwise you'd have a poo-denda
Nonono, you'd have a poo-dendum. Pudenda are plural.
Posted by Clownæsthesiologist | Link to this comment | 09-11-06 8:25 AM
You people have actually said the word "pudenda" out loud? I thought it was only found in dictionary entries, following the phrase "vulg: the female".
Posted by Cryptic Ned | Link to this comment | 09-11-06 8:31 AM
M. leblanc, check your email.
Posted by I don't pay | Link to this comment | 09-11-06 8:31 AM
I've never heard of it used in the vulg way; I've encountered incomprehension because of its obscurity, or because no one hears it pronounced.
Posted by I don't pay | Link to this comment | 09-11-06 8:34 AM
I mean that various vulg words in the dictionary have, as their definition, "pudenda".
Posted by Cryptic Ned | Link to this comment | 09-11-06 8:38 AM
185 -- but when you read those dictionary entries you've got to pronounce the word in your head right?
Posted by Clownæsthesiologist | Link to this comment | 09-11-06 8:38 AM
Personally, I think "pewdenda" sounds less gross than "pyudenda."
Posted by bitchphd | Link to this comment | 09-11-06 8:43 AM
Isn't it only used in the vulg way, first, and second, isn't it, in fact, a not-so-vulg euphemism?
Posted by ben wolfson | Link to this comment | 09-11-06 8:43 AM
not-so-vulg euphemism
Right, my understanding is it means "shameful parts".
Posted by Clownæsthesiologist | Link to this comment | 09-11-06 8:48 AM
re: 190
Yeah, there's that whole phonaesthetic association with 'putrid' if you pronounce it with the 'y' (i.e. the yogh).
Posted by nattarGcM ttaM | Link to this comment | 09-11-06 8:48 AM
188 explains it all.
Posted by ben wolfson | Link to this comment | 09-11-06 8:48 AM
The OED says:
'. 1893 T. M. MADDEN Clin. Gynæcol. v. 59 The value ... of a solution of cocaine freely brushed over the pudendum..is unquestionable.'
and who could possibly deny that?
Posted by nattarGcM ttaM | Link to this comment | 09-11-06 8:49 AM
190: Those look to me like they sound the same (assuming "pew" is pronounced as you would a church bench).
Posted by Matt F | Link to this comment | 09-11-06 8:50 AM
No, phonetically.
Posted by bitchphd | Link to this comment | 09-11-06 8:51 AM
OED says, "neuter gerundive of pud{emac}re to cause shame, ashame, lit. ‘that of which one ought to be ashamed’". Also, that the word refers to genitals, "especially those of a woman". Excellent citation: "The value [for pruritus] of a solution of cocaine freely brushed over the pudendum..is unquestionable." -- 1893 T. M. MADDEN Clin. Gynæcol. -- Does "pruritus" mean what I think it means?
Posted by Clownæsthesiologist | Link to this comment | 09-11-06 8:51 AM
nattarGcM-pwned!
Posted by Clownæsthesiologist | Link to this comment | 09-11-06 8:52 AM
Ah, ok.
Posted by Matt F | Link to this comment | 09-11-06 8:52 AM
"Pyudenda" are Russian genitals; "pewdenda" are Catholic.
Posted by OneFatEnglishman | Link to this comment | 09-11-06 8:53 AM
Incidentally, 'pud' is used in Scots slang for penis.* I assume it has the same root.
* And for all I know, in slang elsewhere, I've not heard it used since I was at school.
Posted by nattarGcM ttaM | Link to this comment | 09-11-06 8:54 AM
Does "pruritus" mean what I think it means?
Sadly, no.
Posted by Clownæsthesiologist | Link to this comment | 09-11-06 8:56 AM
This just hit me: many of us may be familiar with the term "punani". Does this have "pudenda" as its root?
This term also starts with "pu" rather than "pyu", possible explaining why people would see "pudenda" and imagine that it begins with "pu".
Posted by Cryptic Ned | Link to this comment | 09-11-06 8:56 AM
202 -- "pud" is common among youth of Modesto -- as in "pull your pud" for masturbate.
Posted by Clownæsthesiologist | Link to this comment | 09-11-06 8:56 AM
I assume it has the same root.
*Australian snicker*
Posted by standpipe b | Link to this comment | 09-11-06 8:57 AM
202, it is used in the USA as well. I think it dates to less than 100 years ago, though.
Posted by Cryptic Ned | Link to this comment | 09-11-06 8:57 AM
re: 204
According to google-searches on teh internets, punani is Hawaiian.
No idea how Ali G picked it up. Then again, Borat's 'jakshemash' catch-phrase in 'Khazak' is just 'how are you?' in Czech.
Posted by nattarGcM ttaM | Link to this comment | 09-11-06 8:58 AM
punani is Hawaiian.
I always thought it came from a Latin root because it is definitely part of the slang associated with Latinos on the US mainland. Possibly because it sounds like "mami" and "papi".
Posted by Cryptic Ned | Link to this comment | 09-11-06 9:01 AM
Urban dictionary says:
Of course, that could be a made up or bullshit etymology.
Posted by nattarGcM ttaM | Link to this comment | 09-11-06 9:06 AM
I'm surprised that "punani" is supposed to be Hawaiian. There's a Jamaican dancehall song called "Punanny," by Admiral Bailey. I would have guessed its origin to be African.
Posted by dagger aleph | Link to this comment | 09-11-06 9:21 AM
Hey so you guys who can know: were any interesting images uploaded to c0ck@unfogged.com?
Posted by Clownæsthesiologist | Link to this comment | 09-11-06 9:44 AM
181: Wow, yours looks just like mine.
Posted by Magpie | Link to this comment | 09-11-06 10:42 AM
213 to 212.
Posted by bitchphd | Link to this comment | 09-11-06 10:52 AM
202: Might have some relationship to Gaelic, too. AFAIK the word in Irish and Scottish Gaelic both is bod, pronounced like "budh". See the usual old dictionary dance here. And the b in the Gaelic languages is more, is plosive the right word? more p-like than in English.
Posted by Emir | Link to this comment | 09-11-06 11:16 AM
If I've already shown my erect penis to one Unfogged commenter today, do I get a pass on participation in c/0/c/k/@ action?
Posted by Robust McManlyPants | Link to this comment | 09-11-06 11:50 AM
One (just one) problem with this project is Chappelle's Theory. Loosely formulated, it runs thus: "I couldn't pick my own cock out of a lineup!'
The validity of Chappelle's Theorem is undertested, so we can argue about it. I happen to think true, but I'm sure Ogged will argue ~true.
Posted by Michael | Link to this comment | 09-11-06 12:05 PM
216: If we let you get away with that, then Apo's probably off the hook as well; Roberta's been here enough to count as a commenter.
And where would be the fun in letting Apo off the hook?
Posted by LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 09-11-06 12:08 PM
I couldn't pick my own cock out of a lineup!'
But this says nothing about people in general, just about Mr. Chappelle. So what's to argue about?
Posted by Clownæsthesiologist | Link to this comment | 09-11-06 12:08 PM
Clown, you're saying that Chappelle is so special that he is unique in his inability to differentiate among cocks?
Posted by Michael | Link to this comment | 09-11-06 12:24 PM
Well he certainly didn't say "Nobody can pick his own cock out of a lineup!" -- he's just talking about himself. I don't see what would be unreasonable about Chappelle and some other people not being able to recognize their own cocks and a different group being able to.
Posted by Clownæsthesiologist | Link to this comment | 09-11-06 12:29 PM
That seems perfectly reasonable. But how large are those two groups? Are they about even, or does one have a clear majority? As I said, I imagine I belong in the former, with Chappelle.
Posted by Michael | Link to this comment | 09-11-06 12:33 PM
This sounds like an interesting paradox: a penis so unique that it can't be picked out of a lineup.
Posted by mrh | Link to this comment | 09-11-06 12:35 PM
Or rather, "unique in that it cannot be picked out of a lineup".
Posted by Clownæsthesiologist | Link to this comment | 09-11-06 12:36 PM
Wait, I just now read this thread and am confused. Are we sending cock pics or not? Where is the sign-up sheet?
Posted by Brock Landers | Link to this comment | 09-11-06 12:46 PM
225 -- Yeah, totally. Send your picture in to c0ck@unfogged.com. (That's a zero in "c0ck".) Most of the other guys on the site have already done it.
Posted by Clownæsthesiologist | Link to this comment | 09-11-06 12:48 PM
Don't let us down!
Posted by Clownæsthesiologist | Link to this comment | 09-11-06 1:29 PM
Hold your horses, clown. This isn't exactly the sort of project I'm going to undertake here at work, and it'll take me a while to dig up the wide-angle, anyway. Is there a deadline for submissions? (How long will the email address be live?)
And seriously, are we really doing this or not?
Posted by Brock Landers | Link to this comment | 09-11-06 1:42 PM
And seriously, are we really doing this or not?
I love this question. Seriously, there's no way for you to ever be sure. Until you send the picture in. And then it's too late.
Posted by LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 09-11-06 1:44 PM
213: All your [illegible] are belong to me!
Posted by Ttam R. | Link to this comment | 09-11-06 1:49 PM
Once agqin, I take a nap and some thread evolves [devolves?] from Facebook to Scottish cocks.
And people think my brain goes off on tangents...
Posted by DominEditrix | Link to this comment | 09-11-06 1:51 PM
s/b "again". Brain clearly devolving.
Posted by DominEditrix | Link to this comment | 09-11-06 1:52 PM
This isn't exactly the sort of project I'm going to undertake here at work
What, you haven't got a flatbed scanner in your office?
Posted by Clownæsthesiologist | Link to this comment | 09-11-06 1:56 PM
Dear persons who have sent in pictures of a chamber of commerce building, chocolate chip pancakes and sausage on a stick, an owl, and glue: those don't count.
Posted by ben wolfson | Link to this comment | 09-11-06 2:03 PM
I think we should just all send in copies of goatse.
Posted by Chopper | Link to this comment | 09-11-06 2:05 PM
You know, the idea that a man couldn't pick his own cock out of a lineup is just pure bunk. Any healthy adult has had more than enough experience with their own junk to know it from another's.
Posted by Robust McManlyPants | Link to this comment | 09-11-06 2:05 PM
An owl?
Posted by Jackmormon | Link to this comment | 09-11-06 2:08 PM
Glue?
Posted by standpipe b | Link to this comment | 09-11-06 2:09 PM
237: Anticipating 142, maybe?
Posted by standpipe b | Link to this comment | 09-11-06 2:10 PM
I guess it's not glue. It's in some sort of tube and is apparently meant for windows and doors, is made with silicone, and is a GE product.
Posted by ben wolfson | Link to this comment | 09-11-06 2:11 PM
Is it caulk?
Posted by Clownæsthesiologist | Link to this comment | 09-11-06 2:13 PM
Cause that should count.
Posted by Clownæsthesiologist | Link to this comment | 09-11-06 2:14 PM
Caulk! Brilliant.
Posted by ben wolfson | Link to this comment | 09-11-06 2:14 PM
Doesn't count because it's obviously not any one person's caulk; it's clearly an image from the web. It's not, like, apostropher's caulk.
Posted by ben wolfson | Link to this comment | 09-11-06 2:15 PM
239.-- Tits or boobies I could understand. Wolfson, are you sure it was an owl?
Posted by Jackmormon | Link to this comment | 09-11-06 2:16 PM
chocolate chip pancakes and sausage on a stick
I think I know who that was.
And Foghorn Leghorn is LB.
Posted by dagger aleph | Link to this comment | 09-11-06 2:16 PM
Brilliant
Mocking me for being slow on the uptake? Or did you not get it?
Posted by Clownæsthesiologist | Link to this comment | 09-11-06 2:17 PM
Tits or boobies I could understand.
"Hooters", was my thought.
Posted by standpipe b | Link to this comment | 09-11-06 2:19 PM
Did you change the directory these were going to Wolfson, you bastard?
Posted by ogged | Link to this comment | 09-11-06 2:25 PM
Ach so!
Posted by Jackmormon | Link to this comment | 09-11-06 2:25 PM
(And thanks a lot guys -- I had Brock ready to send his photo in and everything and then Ben busts in with his owls and glue stuff.)
Posted by Clownæsthesiologist | Link to this comment | 09-11-06 2:26 PM
Wait, is this supposed to be our caulk? Or our cork?
Posted by Anonymous Unfoggetarian | Link to this comment | 09-11-06 2:27 PM