Re: Damn Dirty Apes

1

Fantastic.


Posted by: AWB | Link to this comment | 07-28-11 3:56 AM
horizontal rule
2

can we get this proposal to Al Franken somehow?


Posted by: Katherine | Link to this comment | 07-28-11 3:57 AM
horizontal rule
3

Beautiful design. The only problem I can see with this is that platinum is really expensive, and you wouldn't want people saying that the Treasury was throwing money at the problem, given the level of debt already. Aluminium would do just as well. Or copper. There's a precedent for copper coinage.


Posted by: chris y | Link to this comment | 07-28-11 4:02 AM
horizontal rule
4

3: the problem there is that the law specifically only covers platinum coins. However, the $2 trillion coin could be really, really small.

I like the idea of putting Reagan on it. Reminds me of the debased US currency in "Snow Crash".


Posted by: ajay | Link to this comment | 07-28-11 4:12 AM
horizontal rule
5

I found this so brilliant I tried to link it on fb (yes, I'm That Guy), but it turns out unfogged is extraordinarily uncooperative about this. Perhaps it's for the best.


Posted by: glowingquaddamge | Link to this comment | 07-28-11 4:35 AM
horizontal rule
6

Unsurprisingly, google image search turns up a ridiculous number of options for Ronald Reagan coins.


Posted by: Katherine | Link to this comment | 07-28-11 4:41 AM
horizontal rule
7

5: if someone puts the image on flickr you could link to that...


Posted by: ajay | Link to this comment | 07-28-11 4:52 AM
horizontal rule
8

Very good. Maybe a small little 'd' as a mint mark. Somebody told me the d coins were rarer.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 07-28-11 4:56 AM
horizontal rule
9

7: It is on flickr, here, but it may not be publicly linkable.


Posted by: AWB | Link to this comment | 07-28-11 4:59 AM
horizontal rule
10

Brilliant. Although I kind of think it should say "TWO TRILLION DOLLARS" in words (is the '$' sign on any of our currency?)


Posted by: essear | Link to this comment | 07-28-11 5:01 AM
horizontal rule
11

9: Ah, no, it's public.


Posted by: AWB | Link to this comment | 07-28-11 5:04 AM
horizontal rule
12

You can see it OK on flickr.


Posted by: chris y | Link to this comment | 07-28-11 5:06 AM
horizontal rule
13

re: 10

I can't read the word 'trillion' without hearing it in Mike Myers 'Dr Evil' voice.


Posted by: nattarGcM ttaM | Link to this comment | 07-28-11 5:10 AM
horizontal rule
14

Although I kind of think it should say "TWO TRILLION DOLLARS" in words (is the '$' sign on any of our currency?)

This is correct. Our coinage statutes inexplicably specify that coins should be imprinted with the denomination in words rather than numbers, leaving foreign visitors to try to puzzle out whether the little coin that says "one dime" is worth more or less than "five cents" or "one quarter dollar".


Posted by: Knecht Ruprecht | Link to this comment | 07-28-11 5:18 AM
horizontal rule
15

10: (is the '$' sign on any of our currency?)

Yeah, the denomination is the part I am most unsure on. TWO TRILLION might be better. But the '$' does appear on at least some versions of the $100 platinum coin. And it was my daughter who actually did the final work on the reverse side starting from Katherine's design--I merely used my powers of persuasion to compel her to contribute her discretionary effort.


Posted by: JP Stormcrow | Link to this comment | 07-28-11 5:19 AM
horizontal rule
16

TR would totally have done this. BHO won't.


Posted by: CharleyCarp | Link to this comment | 07-28-11 6:09 AM
horizontal rule
17

Can't you just link to the image file, or does that not work on Zuckerbook?


Posted by: Stanley | Link to this comment | 07-28-11 6:13 AM
horizontal rule
18

31 USC 5112(d)(1) (from your link in the OP:

United States coins shall have the inscription "In God We Trust". The obverse side of each coin shall have the inscription "Liberty". The reverse side of each coin shall have the inscriptions "United States of America" and "E Pluribus Unum" and a designation of the value of the coin.

Posted by: urple | Link to this comment | 07-28-11 6:19 AM
horizontal rule
19

18: Great, now its too late to redesign and we have to default. Fucking lawyers.


Posted by: Walt Someguy | Link to this comment | 07-28-11 6:23 AM
horizontal rule
20

18: but, according to k,
"The Secretary may mint and issue platinum bullion coins and proof platinum coins in accordance with such specifications, designs, varieties, quantities, denominations, and inscriptions as the Secretary, in the Secretary's discretion, may prescribe from time to time. "

And I think that supersedes the restrictions in d (1), just as it does the restrictions in a. But IANAL.


Posted by: ajay | Link to this comment | 07-28-11 6:28 AM
horizontal rule
21

21: Yay, ajay saved the world economy!


Posted by: Walt Someguy | Link to this comment | 07-28-11 6:30 AM
horizontal rule
22

I think we ought to put the standard inscriptions on there, just to be safe. I agree that (k) might arguably override that portion of (d)(1), but do we really want to risk it?


Posted by: urple | Link to this comment | 07-28-11 6:32 AM
horizontal rule
23

there's plenty of room around the edges, but making the text wrap around in mspaint is too annoying for me. I nominate JP Stormcrow's daughter.


Posted by: Katherine | Link to this comment | 07-28-11 6:35 AM
horizontal rule
24

there's plenty of room around the edges, but making the text wrap around in mspaint is too annoying for me. I nominate JP Stormcrow's daughter.


Posted by: Katherine | Link to this comment | 07-28-11 6:36 AM
horizontal rule
25

Bravi tutti!


Posted by: oudemia | Link to this comment | 07-28-11 6:37 AM
horizontal rule
26

Yay, ajay saved the world economy!

And Minivet's trousers. I'm on a roll here.


Posted by: | Link to this comment | 07-28-11 6:45 AM
horizontal rule
27

24: Oh, I wasn't necessarily suggesting a change be made to the draft design on the front page here. I was just giving the treasury some advice, in case they're reading. I didn't want them to adopt our model wholesale, without modifications. But they probably have graphic designers who could do that make that sort of change easily. Maybe even with some program better than mspaint.


Posted by: urple | Link to this comment | 07-28-11 6:47 AM
horizontal rule
28

Fucking lawyers.

HOW DO THEY WORK?!


Posted by: Mister Smearcase | Link to this comment | 07-28-11 7:00 AM
horizontal rule
29

The intent of this law was for the Treasury to make chintzy coins to sell to collectors or something, right? If so, I suspect there may be arcane reasons the citation isn't as useful as we think - like maybe the law making currency legal tender for all debts doesn't apply to it.


Posted by: Minivet | Link to this comment | 07-28-11 7:04 AM
horizontal rule
30

29: I don't know in detail, and what you say is possible, but my guess from the statutes I've read is that there isn't anything arcane in the statutes preventing the tactic. Legislatures are sloppy animals, and drafting laws that say exactly and only what you mean them to is hard (as in, for example, the debt limit law).

What's going to keep it from happening is that it's ridiculous, not that it's illegal, but I think if Obama were willing to embrace the ridiculous, he could do this.


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 07-28-11 7:08 AM
horizontal rule
31

Having just read the Balkinization post linked, I agree that it would make Obama one of the biggest laughingstocks in history - enough to make him one-term even if the economy roars back tomorrow. He ought to be able to ignore that if it really prevents financial apocalypse, but face it, he probably won't.

Also as far as I've been able to tell, Obama is about as unconventional as a Spokane real estate agent. (His response to a question about legalizing cannabis for revenue purposes was "lol stoners.")


Posted by: Minivet | Link to this comment | 07-28-11 7:17 AM
horizontal rule
32

Well, if he doesn't, I still want one of these, like a challenge coin, or one of the Dumbledore's Army ones in the 5th Harry Potter book.


Posted by: Katherine | Link to this comment | 07-28-11 7:19 AM
horizontal rule
33

20.2: And I think that supersedes the restrictions in d (1)

The existing $100 platinum coin I linked in 15 does not strictly adhere to those standards ("E Pluribus Unum" is on the obverse rather than the reverse side) so I think we're golden .9995 platinum.


Posted by: JP Stormcrow | Link to this comment | 07-28-11 7:23 AM
horizontal rule
34

31: Oh, I think if it worked people would get over the silliness instantly. The political repercussions would be for the highhanded exercise of power Congress had only accidentally given him, not for the ridiculousness.


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 07-28-11 7:24 AM
horizontal rule
35

Apparently the Isle of Man was a pioneer in platinum coinage.


Posted by: JP Stormcrow | Link to this comment | 07-28-11 7:30 AM
horizontal rule
36

34: A majority of the public doesn't even believe this is a serious problem! Add that to media transmission of Republican talking points, and I think you get calls of "funny money" and "I wish I could make myself a trillion-buck coin" from even the most politically disengaged.


Posted by: Minivet | Link to this comment | 07-28-11 7:30 AM
horizontal rule
37

35: What, no triskelion?


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 07-28-11 7:33 AM
horizontal rule
38

36: The fallout is less than from 20% unemployment, though.

In fact, it would pretty expansionary, and would probably lower unemployment. You could defend it as policy on the merits, even without the debt ceiling fight.


Posted by: Walt Someguy | Link to this comment | 07-28-11 7:45 AM
horizontal rule
39

You guys are worrying too much about how small to make the $2 trillion platinum coin, when you should be worrying about how large you could make it. Surely someone with better arbitrage skills than me could figure out a way to make a super-gigantic platinum coin that would tie up a significant amount of the world's platinum reserves and create an artificial scarcity that could be exploited to make somebody a lot of money.


Posted by: Natilo Paennim | Link to this comment | 07-28-11 8:06 AM
horizontal rule
40

("E Pluribus Unum" is on the obverse rather than the reverse side)

HOW CAN YOU TELL


Posted by: nosflow | Link to this comment | 07-28-11 8:08 AM
horizontal rule
41

Maybe everything else is on the wrong side.


Posted by: nosflow | Link to this comment | 07-28-11 8:09 AM
horizontal rule
42

39: Yes! A huge coin! Also important: make sure you can print out an image of the coin and, by folding it just so, reveal the Most Important Thing: Nic Cage sucks.


Posted by: Stanley | Link to this comment | 07-28-11 8:15 AM
horizontal rule
43

but I think if Obama were willing to embrace the ridiculous, he could do this.

Modern Republican alchemy has transmuted the ridiculous into standard operating procedure. It's a shame the Dems don't have the mojo to pull off something like this.


Posted by: politicalfootball | Link to this comment | 07-28-11 8:16 AM
horizontal rule
44

40, 41: Maybe I have retroactive access to Wikipedia information other than the linked image.


Posted by: JP Stormcrow | Link to this comment | 07-28-11 8:24 AM
horizontal rule
45

Damn it, Stanley, I was going to make a National Treasure joke.


Posted by: Katherine | Link to this comment | 07-28-11 8:31 AM
horizontal rule
46

45: There needn't be only one.


Posted by: Stanley | Link to this comment | 07-28-11 8:37 AM
horizontal rule
47

A very efficient idea: it solves the debt ceiling crisis and provides the plot of the next National Treasure movie at a single stroke.


Posted by: DS | Link to this comment | 07-28-11 8:44 AM
horizontal rule
48

Oh goddammit.


Posted by: DS | Link to this comment | 07-28-11 8:45 AM
horizontal rule
49

37: What, no triskelion?

Saw a bunch of those flags on a couple of the Tour de France stages. Also, there seems to have been this Pan-Celtic flag (Brittany, Scotland, Wales, Ireland, Isle of Man (Manx), and Cornwall).


Posted by: JP Stormcrow | Link to this comment | 07-28-11 8:56 AM
horizontal rule
50

47: Sean Bean hasn't died yet* so there must be more.

*Is that correct? He just gets hauled off at the end of the first (or it is implied that he will get hauled off)?


Posted by: JP Stormcrow | Link to this comment | 07-28-11 8:58 AM
horizontal rule
51

50: I was joking, but Jerry Bruckheimer confirms they're already making the next one.


Posted by: DS | Link to this comment | 07-28-11 9:05 AM
horizontal rule
52

the obverse rather than the reverse side

The inverse, the obverse, the converse, the reverse, the sharpening wing of the edge of a sparrow. For suitable reckonings too numerous to mention, as the queen is fat she is devoured by rats. There is one way to skin a cat or poison a rat it is heretofore here to three forthrightly stated.


Posted by: The Velvet Underground | Link to this comment | 07-28-11 9:05 AM
horizontal rule
53

Only an injection of $100 billion dollars for the first payment - $507 billion dollars if we want to lock up August so that we can enjoy the summer.

Definitely no inflationary effects.


Posted by: Andrew F. | Link to this comment | 07-28-11 9:11 AM
horizontal rule
54

That design lacks the clarity of the message I proposed, but it is nice looking. So long as it isn't a montage design.


Posted by: Megan | Link to this comment | 07-28-11 9:20 AM
horizontal rule
55

54: Shit, we forgot the "- OPINIONATED CHARLTON HESTON".


Posted by: JP Stormcrow | Link to this comment | 07-28-11 9:30 AM
horizontal rule
56

I've always said we should put Reagan on the penny, then abolish the penny. This is better, though.


Posted by: Hamilton-Lovecraft | Link to this comment | 07-28-11 10:14 AM
horizontal rule
57

||

Raw pâté sablée for breakfast may have some downsides, but at the moment I sure can't think of any.

|>


Posted by: nosflow | Link to this comment | 07-28-11 10:48 AM
horizontal rule
58

I like the $100 platinum coin linked in 33. Can I get those from my bank? Are stores required to accept them?


Posted by: urple | Link to this comment | 07-28-11 11:03 AM
horizontal rule
59

58: I assume they are legal tender. However,

The US Mint announced a maximum authorized mintage of 8,000 coins and an ordering limit of five per household. The coins were priced at $1,792 each based on the average price of platinum for the prior week plus a mark up. After only one week of availability, the coins sold out their entire mintage of 8,000.[2009 version - DAS]
So I'm sure your savvy storekeeper would welcome them being used in that fashion.


Posted by: JP Stormcrow | Link to this comment | 07-28-11 11:12 AM
horizontal rule
60

Am I reading 59 correctly that the price of the actual platinum in the coins is vastly higher than the face value of the coins themselves? That seems stupid. If that's the case, why aren't these $10,000 coins? Doesn't the US Mint understand seigniorage?


Posted by: urple | Link to this comment | 07-28-11 12:54 PM
horizontal rule
61

One would have thought they'd learned their lesson with the copper penny.


Posted by: Eggplant | Link to this comment | 07-28-11 12:56 PM
horizontal rule
62

60; This is why they are really just commemorative collector's items. But with the 2 TRILLION DOLLAR version the seigniorage is the whole point.


Posted by: JP Stormcrow | Link to this comment | 07-28-11 1:28 PM
horizontal rule
63

It should be the size of that coin in the Batcave. (Is that coin still in the Batcave, anyone who's read a Batman comic in the last fifteen or so years?)


Posted by: Tom Scudder | Link to this comment | 07-28-11 4:29 PM
horizontal rule