Re: Shocking photos

1

That doesn't look like enough trash for seven days.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 06- 8-15 6:20 AM
horizontal rule
2

Come on, do we really need yet more proof of the validity of Rule 34? I mean, it's Monday morning, for chrissakes.


Posted by: My Alter Ego | Link to this comment | 06- 8-15 6:26 AM
horizontal rule
3

I forget, what's rule 34? That if you have a "but" clause you should invert the order? That when a measure becomes a target it ceases to be a good measure? Dunning-Krueger?


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 06- 8-15 6:31 AM
horizontal rule
4

It's a novel by Charlie Stross.


Posted by: Natilo Paennim | Link to this comment | 06- 8-15 6:32 AM
horizontal rule
5

#1 was exactly my thought. Also, I don't see food waste. I guess that would tip the scales from gross to too gross.


Posted by: Blume | Link to this comment | 06- 8-15 6:35 AM
horizontal rule
6

5: That's "I don't even see food waste."


Posted by: Natilo Paennim | Link to this comment | 06- 8-15 6:37 AM
horizontal rule
7

There's a smashed up watermelon in one photo. We waste a bunch of watermelon also. Watermelon is a nice idea, but it doesn't actually taste that good.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 06- 8-15 6:39 AM
horizontal rule
8

You know what might be instructive? Rural versus urban trash practices.

Out in the sticks, it seems to me, people have very different attitudes about what kind of trash they create/are willing to create. For instance, it's no problem to have extra dry paper trash, because you can just put it in the wood stove whenever. And if you know you're going to be hauling any big piece of trash to the town dump yourself, not to mention just regular trash bags, it seems like you have some incentives to minimize it that don't obtain for city slickers.


Posted by: Natilo Paennim | Link to this comment | 06- 8-15 6:40 AM
horizontal rule
9

Melons in general don't taste that good. There, I said it.


Posted by: Natilo Paennim | Link to this comment | 06- 8-15 6:41 AM
horizontal rule
10

Right now we have a honeydew melon in the fridge. Somebody gave it to us and we have to keep it until it rots so we can throw it away.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 06- 8-15 6:42 AM
horizontal rule
11

Milt drinks too much.


Posted by: togolosh | Link to this comment | 06- 8-15 6:48 AM
horizontal rule
12

7- Obviously you're not knocking on your melons properly when choosing them at the store.


Posted by: SP | Link to this comment | 06- 8-15 6:50 AM
horizontal rule
13

And oddly I feel like I just made a watermelon knocking joke here a couple months ago.


Posted by: SP | Link to this comment | 06- 8-15 6:50 AM
horizontal rule
14

I don't understand this attitude toward melons. I posit that you're all eating them underripe.


Posted by: Blume | Link to this comment | 06- 8-15 6:53 AM
horizontal rule
15

Melons are the filler at all workplace-based catering fruit salads.


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 06- 8-15 6:58 AM
horizontal rule
16

I always just pick out the raspberries, blueberries, and strawberries.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 06- 8-15 7:00 AM
horizontal rule
17

If there are bananas it means mass layoffs are coming soon.


Posted by: SP | Link to this comment | 06- 8-15 7:02 AM
horizontal rule
18

For me, when the temperature is 95+, melons are great. Otherwise, their proportion of flavor-to-water is not high enough for me.

Also, as heebie says, they're too often used as filler in institutional kitchens, and sliced melon that has been sitting for 6-24 hours before you eat it is just slimy and gross.


Posted by: Witt | Link to this comment | 06- 8-15 7:06 AM
horizontal rule
19

18.1: Right. The Bud Light of fruit.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 06- 8-15 7:16 AM
horizontal rule
20

I used to call Jammies "The Champagne of Boyfriends".


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 06- 8-15 7:18 AM
horizontal rule
21

But to return to topic the of the photo series, I think the photographer is pointing his lance at the wrong windmill. Yes, people in the U.S. throw a lot of stuff away. Hardly surprising, given that cheap, disposable products are the foundation of our entire economy.

And egg cartons! And pizza boxes! Quelle horreur!!!


Posted by: My Alter Ego | Link to this comment | 06- 8-15 7:21 AM
horizontal rule
22

You can recycle egg cartons and the top of the pizza box (assuming the grease is only on the bottom portion of the box).


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 06- 8-15 7:23 AM
horizontal rule
23

But why are they laying in the trash? What on earth does that do besides be gross or be satire? It's not like the families around the world had to roll around in their week's worth of groceries for that photo shoot. "Break all the eggs over your head, pour out your milk over your kid...come on now. We want to illustrate how clean the Somali kid is, compared to the kid from Alabama."


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 06- 8-15 7:25 AM
horizontal rule
24

If the point of the photos is that people are throwing out stuff that should be routed to the recycling bin, that's fair. But unless you have a compost pile in your back yard, that watermelon rind is headed for the landfill.


Posted by: My Alter Ego | Link to this comment | 06- 8-15 7:27 AM
horizontal rule
25

What on earth does that do besides be gross or be satire?

It's porn, obviously. (See comment 2.)


Posted by: My Alter Ego | Link to this comment | 06- 8-15 7:28 AM
horizontal rule
26

You never told me what Rule 34 was.


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 06- 8-15 7:29 AM
horizontal rule
27

9: you are dead to me, natilo. I will grant that cubes of tasteless honeydew are abused as fruit salad filler, but are those strawberries not styrofoam-like at their hollow cores? bad melon is bad; bad everything is bad. I guess I'm not crazy about jackfruit, but it's ok in a curry.


Posted by: alameida | Link to this comment | 06- 8-15 7:31 AM
horizontal rule
28

I thought we had discussed Rule 34 before.


Posted by: My Alter Ego | Link to this comment | 06- 8-15 7:31 AM
horizontal rule
29

heebie: I think the project fails on its own lame terms by not having half-slices of rotten bologna glistening on the peoples' thighs.


Posted by: alameida | Link to this comment | 06- 8-15 7:32 AM
horizontal rule
30

But why are they laying in the trash?

LYING


Posted by: nosflow | Link to this comment | 06- 8-15 7:43 AM
horizontal rule
31

Well, sure, they're posed, but I wouldn't call that a lie. It's art.


Posted by: dalriata | Link to this comment | 06- 8-15 7:44 AM
horizontal rule
32

Laying, lying, the surgeon is the boy's mom. Who can say.


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 06- 8-15 7:47 AM
horizontal rule
33

LAYING.
because heebie is in the south, technically.


Posted by: alameida | Link to this comment | 06- 8-15 7:48 AM
horizontal rule
34

7, 9: Are you both actually the same person and that person is the devil?

Musk melons are definitely in the upper third of fruits, and watermelons are one of the greatest things ever. A good watermelon in summer is one of the most satisfying things ever and a serious danger if you have anything you need to do before your system can expel the quarts of unnecessary water you've just ingested.


Posted by: MHPH | Link to this comment | 06- 8-15 7:56 AM
horizontal rule
35

Melon is very tasty. What's more, when I lived in Shanghai in the long-ago halcyon days of my youth, you could get special individual-serving-sized honeydew-like melons.

I think that a problem with this type of photo - though obviously less so with these trash ones - is that it aestheticizes politics and plays into Western (and orientalist!) fascination with minimalism. No one ever wants to say "hey, actually it's kind of nice for a kid to have a Lite Brite and some dolls and modeling clay and a couple of stuffed animals instead of just one little hand-crafted puppet made out of sticks" or "actually I quite like having a bed and a couple of armchairs and several rugs plus a complete set of Fire King and a nice record collection rather than two iron pots, several plastic tubs and a straw mat". We're all supposed to pretend that Having Less Stuff is better on the face of it, more moral, etc, when all it really boils down to is that less stuff makes a better photo.

While of course it's possible to have too much stuff to use or enjoy, the problem gets framed as "you greedy people want too many things" instead of "methods of production and distribution are fucked and wasteful". Unless you have the choice of not having just, like, a straw mat and a cooking pot, getting stuck with just a straw mat and a cooking pot seems like a bit of a drawback.

Nice stuff is nice, frankly. More people should have nice stuff.


Posted by: Frowner | Link to this comment | 06- 8-15 8:37 AM
horizontal rule
36

Natilo's Hierarchy of Fruit:
Wild blueberries
Wild strawberries
Wild/feral raspberries
Champagne mangoes
Regular strawberries
Regular raspberries
Honeycrisp apples
Ripe pears
Fuji apples
Regular mangoes
Ripe peaches
Kiwi fruit
Oranges
Bananas
Tangerines
Maraschino cherries
Regular blueberries
Limes
Tomatoes
Lemons
Coconuts
Papaya
Guava
Passionfruit
Watermelon
Red Delicious/Granny Smith apples
Honeydew melon
Cantaloupe


Posted by: Natilo Paennim | Link to this comment | 06- 8-15 8:38 AM
horizontal rule
37

What are blackberries, chopped liver?


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 06- 8-15 8:40 AM
horizontal rule
38

That's some hierarchy for an anarchist, buddy.

How do you think the fruit feels about it?


Posted by: Frowner | Link to this comment | 06- 8-15 8:40 AM
horizontal rule
39

And razz-ma-tazz-berries?


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 06- 8-15 8:40 AM
horizontal rule
40

Well, the cantaloupe is probably pretty relieved, actually.


Posted by: Natilo Paennim | Link to this comment | 06- 8-15 8:41 AM
horizontal rule
41

On the local mother's FB page, some woman was asking for feedback on possible baby names to go with the last name "Berry". They all sounded unnaturally funny to me, especially "Kort".


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 06- 8-15 8:41 AM
horizontal rule
42

Did anyone suggest "Berry"?


Posted by: Natilo Paennim | Link to this comment | 06- 8-15 8:43 AM
horizontal rule
43

I went to middle school with a kid whose last name was Berry, first name Sarvis.


Posted by: E. Messily | Link to this comment | 06- 8-15 8:45 AM
horizontal rule
44

There are tons of options though! Barry, Cary/Carrie, Gary, Harry, Jerry, Larry, Mary, Perry, Sherry, Terry,

MARION,

I don't see what the problem is.


Posted by: E. Messily | Link to this comment | 06- 8-15 8:48 AM
horizontal rule
45

35.2 seems a bit removed my experience of the sheer amount of stuff in most middle class American houses. It isn't a bed and couple of arm chairs. It's having a fully furnished house, plus a basement or storage area filled with enough furnishing for another house.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 06- 8-15 8:50 AM
horizontal rule
46

Very Berry, obviously.

It's my contention that short last names require long first names. Menelaus, Maximilian, Anaximander.


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 06- 8-15 8:54 AM
horizontal rule
47

35

It's also a really outdated concept of what it means to be wealthy. Stuff is cheap and ubiquitous enough that it probably in most of the world amount of stuff no longer correlates with wealth. IME with poverty and wealth in China and the US, poor people don't necessarily own less stuff. In fact, I'd say minimalism is a marker of UMC-ness in both places, whereas hoarding anything you can get your hands on is a definite marker of poverty.


Posted by: Buttercup | Link to this comment | 06- 8-15 8:56 AM
horizontal rule
48

Marion berries are the best berries. Not the best mayors though.


Posted by: Buttercup | Link to this comment | 06- 8-15 8:57 AM
horizontal rule
49

47: your use of undifferentiated "stuff" got me thinking...suppose you wanted to maximize the amount of mass you owned, in terms of material that's solid at room temperature. What's the cheapest thing you can buy?


Posted by: dalriata | Link to this comment | 06- 8-15 9:02 AM
horizontal rule
50

Clean straw.


Posted by: Natilo Paennim | Link to this comment | 06- 8-15 9:03 AM
horizontal rule
51

There's just so very much shit around, especially if you have kids. Even if you try to only buy them stuff made in Scandinavia by elves using only birch and unbleached muslin, plastic shit starts to appear in your house every holiday or family visit. And that's before they go to school and learn about stuff they can ask for. Now, even going to a birthday party for another kids means you come home with at least five or six cubic feet of stuff.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 06- 8-15 9:04 AM
horizontal rule
52

49: I'm not sure, but I bet it's in Amazon in the toy section.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 06- 8-15 9:05 AM
horizontal rule
53

Not the best mayors though.

Absolutely the best mayors. If, by "best," you mean "most fun to read about."


Posted by: Spike | Link to this comment | 06- 8-15 9:06 AM
horizontal rule
54

What's the cheapest thing you can buy?

Based on this, lead is still your best bet.


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 06- 8-15 9:07 AM
horizontal rule
55

Once two people in your peer group hear about Oriental Trading Company, it's all over. I'd blame Edward Said, but I'm pretty sure direct responsibility goes to some guy in Omaha.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 06- 8-15 9:10 AM
horizontal rule
56

In fact, I'd say minimalism is a marker of UMC-ness in both places, whereas hoarding anything you can get your hands on is a definite marker of poverty.

Yep! You see regular articles in the NYT from some rich person talking about how everyone should emulate their lifestyle of only owning 100 things or whatever. I have a friend who makes a lot of money and is on the "spend nothing, retire at 50" plan, or as we used to call it "being a miser". I show up at his apartment and the couch is gone. "I just got tired of it", he says. Clearly this is a good lifestyle if you figure you can just buy another one if you need it.


Posted by: Cryptic ned | Link to this comment | 06- 8-15 9:11 AM
horizontal rule
57

"I just got tired of it", he says.

It's possible he did something reasonable, like lit it on fire and cast it from the roof.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 06- 8-15 9:14 AM
horizontal rule
58

54: I'm reading that as saying concrete is the cheapest, but the caffeine hasn't affected me yet. I'm amused to see "Ice (H20)" listed as a ceramic.


Posted by: dalriata | Link to this comment | 06- 8-15 9:14 AM
horizontal rule
59

I didn't fit in a waste management tour in either NYC or Boston. No-one else wanted to see Deer Island! No consumer composting in either? When the trash has to sit on the curb anyway, separating the compostables isn't more whiffy. And then you have somewhere to put the pizza boxes.

I suspect refrigerating melons ruins them, like tomatoes.


Posted by: clew | Link to this comment | 06- 8-15 9:20 AM
horizontal rule
60

47: Yes, of course, which is why this type of photo series just plays into the usual practice of collapsing UMC habits with virtue, only using, say, an indigenous family in Bolivia as a prop . In a way it's another form of expropriation - even the image of poverty and lack gets taken and used to strengthen wealth and power, sort of like pointing to a woman in a famine-stricken region and saying that she's enviably thin or something.


Posted by: Frowner | Link to this comment | 06- 8-15 9:20 AM
horizontal rule
61

Stuff is cheap and ubiquitous enough that it probably in most of the world amount of stuff no longer correlates with wealth.

I am pretty certain this is not the case. I think you could go to most countries and ask "how many cubic feet would we need to haul all your movable possessions?" - even ignoring their accommodation, which you probably oughtn't - and the answer would correlate pretty well with their wealth. I mean, and I hate to sound holier than thou, but have you ever actually seen inside the home of someone who is living in absolute poverty? Less than $1.25 a day? There is very little stuff in such a house. That's why the house is able to be so small.


Posted by: ajay | Link to this comment | 06- 8-15 9:25 AM
horizontal rule
62

But unless you have a compost pile in your back yard, that watermelon rind is headed for the landfill

At the risk of sounding insufferable, I can report that that's not true here, because we have municipal composting.


Posted by: Jesus McQueen | Link to this comment | 06- 8-15 9:26 AM
horizontal rule
63

61: In rural areas at least they tend to have gear, like baskets or fish traps or some such. Space is at less of a premium, and they need more tools to get by.


Posted by: foolishmortal | Link to this comment | 06- 8-15 9:49 AM
horizontal rule
64

61

Yes I have. I lived in one of the poorest regions of one of the poorest provinces of a developing country for two years. There may still be parts of the world that are "stuff" poor, but I doubt it's as common as it even might have been 10 or 15 years ago. A few years ago I read an article that most clothing you donate gets thrown away, because even the rag market is over-saturated. I'd also guess that most stuff owned by really poor people is scavenged or given as hand-me-downs/bartered. Never throwing anything away also leads to massive stuff accumulation. This stuff isn't necessarily valuable or useful, but it is stuff.

On another note, my grandfather's best friend (and possibly lover?) was a miser of the type they don't make any more. He used empty vegetable crates as furniture, and a broken pool table for his dining room table. He tied his pants with a rope, and only at canned foods. He left a million dollars in cash hidden under his floor boards after his death at age 98. He verbally bequeathed it to my grandfather, but left no written will, so it went to distant relatives.


Posted by: Buttercup | Link to this comment | 06- 8-15 9:50 AM
horizontal rule
65

I would agree that for urban poor, space is a big issue, and a limiting factor for stuff accumulation.


Posted by: Buttercup | Link to this comment | 06- 8-15 9:55 AM
horizontal rule
66

64: If he spent money on furniture and decent food, maybe his relatives wouldn't have been distant.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 06- 8-15 9:58 AM
horizontal rule
67

While I'm serial commenting, I'd say my biggest issue with "stuff" as a proxy for wealth is it detracts from things that are more important, like access to fresh food, clean water, education, and health care, all of which are intangible(ish) goods that matter far more for people's lives. At worst, it's used to claim people aren't "really" poor because they own TVs or air conditioners, and at best it's just kind of morally obnoxious and feeds into a sort of UMC classicism that's already been mentioned (e.g. one wooden toy is better than 50 plastic toys). Not that there's not an environmental or labor argument to be made, but in this framework it always comes out as a personal attack against the parents buying 50 cheap plastic toys, and not as a structural critique of capital or labor practices.


Posted by: Buttercup | Link to this comment | 06- 8-15 10:00 AM
horizontal rule
68

64: and you reckon that, overall, you couldn't see a correlation between "volume of stuff" and "wealth"? As in, you could be told "all this man's possessions will fit in the back of a car" and he could as easily be rich or poor? Conversely, you reckon someone with three ISO containers worth of stuff could easily be living on 6 RMB a day?
I'm prepared to believe "some people on low incomes have a lot more stuff than you might think", but I have real problems believing that there's no correlation at all.


Posted by: ajay | Link to this comment | 06- 8-15 10:03 AM
horizontal rule
69

68

I would say where I lived there was an inverse correlation between volume of stuff and wealth, which held to at least a certain level. The poorest people I knew kept rooms of junk (broken toys, busted woven baskets, 6 rusty bicycles, plastic bags of old clothes. stacks of feed bags), whereas richer people tended to live in well manicured apartments, with some of the wealthiest people having apartments that looked like IKEA catalogs.* Definitely by value, richer people had much better, nicer stuff, and they also consumed a lot more new stuff. They mostly got rid of stuff that was broken, or never acquired it in the first place. The poorest people I knew sorted through garbage and took home stuff they thought might be potentially useful, and AFAIK almost never threw anything out that.

*Older peasants who'd been forced into apartments by the government packed them floor to ceiling with stuff. I would say the absolute richest people probably had the same or maybe slightly higher volume of stuff spread out of a much larger area, and which consisted of things like expensive antiques or artwork. But, like, a large Ming vase takes up the same volume as two rotting crates.


Posted by: Buttercup | Link to this comment | 06- 8-15 10:12 AM
horizontal rule
70

But if the rotting crates are nested, they might be smaller.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 06- 8-15 10:16 AM
horizontal rule
71

Yes of course, billionaires with 15 homes have more stuff than everyone else, but the argument is not that the global .01% own more than everyone else, it's always "look you spoiled Westerner with gobs of stuff, you're better off than you think you are." It's not even that the argument isn't necessarily true, it's just that volume of stuff is the wrong metric to measure it. Focusing on water quality or exposure to carcinogens would be better, but it's much less photogenic.


Posted by: Buttercup | Link to this comment | 06- 8-15 10:30 AM
horizontal rule
72

It's my contention that short last names require long first names. Menelaus, Maximilian, Anaximander.

A friend of mine recently had a son named Anaximander.


Posted by: nosflow | Link to this comment | 06- 8-15 10:30 AM
horizontal rule
73

Hieronymus.


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 06- 8-15 10:38 AM
horizontal rule
74

Something you never think about in historical fiction: People would have been surrounded by hand-me-down stuff, some possibly lasting for generations. Not that they wouldn't have new stuff too, but some little horse doll that some guy in Poland made in 300 AD could still be going strong 100 years later.


Posted by: Natilo Paennim | Link to this comment | 06- 8-15 10:51 AM
horizontal rule
75

They had collectables in a way we'd understand.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 06- 8-15 10:57 AM
horizontal rule
76

That's about a third of what I think about in historical fiction, though: material survival with really scarce resources. The other thirds are "horsie!" and clever interpretation of incomplete historical record, so.


Posted by: clew | Link to this comment | 06- 8-15 11:16 AM
horizontal rule
77

material survival with really scarce resources

Scarcity is why the bodices keep ripping.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 06- 8-15 11:20 AM
horizontal rule
78

||
Reusing material resources: anyone who wants a great-grandpa tie: get me your mailing address and tell me if you prefer autumnal or bluish colors and if you'd like one of the really heavy woolly ones. There is a first-come-first-served based on when I get exasperated or sell them to local hipsters.

Oddity: three plain cream wool ties, different widths as though they were bought at different times. Is this a sartorial sturdy commonplace with... with what? Flippanter?
|>


Posted by: clew | Link to this comment | 06- 8-15 11:24 AM
horizontal rule
79
WIZARDS!

Posted by: Natilo Paennim | Link to this comment | 06- 8-15 11:26 AM
horizontal rule
80

78: Ooh! I would like one. Are we friends at the other place? I can't remember.


Posted by: Natilo Paennim | Link to this comment | 06- 8-15 11:27 AM
horizontal rule
81

I would be so goddamn annoyed if someone ripped my bodice. Cut the laces, you nitwit, they're meant to be replaced. Also, by the steel period the bodice is in many ways stronger than the wearer's ribcage.


Posted by: clew | Link to this comment | 06- 8-15 11:28 AM
horizontal rule
82

80: I think working this out is a reasonable price for a tie.


Posted by: clew | Link to this comment | 06- 8-15 11:29 AM
horizontal rule
83

I thought they just ripped naturally, because of frayed fibers and deep, heaving breaths.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 06- 8-15 11:30 AM
horizontal rule
84

Hmm, okay, I'll have to start a spreadsheet, like for one of those logic puzzles.


Posted by: Natilo Paennim | Link to this comment | 06- 8-15 11:33 AM
horizontal rule
85

Generalizing enormously, they're* made of a couple layers of heavy denim** and often bound with wash-leather. Heaving breaths are likely to pop the breasts out the top, which can be a good time for all.

*taking bodice as including the corset. The meant-to-be-seen cloth fitted over the corset is also called the bodice, but ripping that just gets you the corset.

** best everyday equivalent of coutil IMO.


Posted by: clew | Link to this comment | 06- 8-15 11:37 AM
horizontal rule
86

How does one get you one's email address?


Posted by: nosflow | Link to this comment | 06- 8-15 11:39 AM
horizontal rule
87

Er mailing address.


Posted by: nosflow | Link to this comment | 06- 8-15 11:39 AM
horizontal rule
88

Having just learned what it really was on Supersizers, I wonder if there's some ancient-Roman historical fiction that really gets into garum and what people liked about it, but maybe that would alienate the culture more than authors like to do. It appears Colleen McCullough's books are set before it became popular.


Posted by: Minivet | Link to this comment | 06- 8-15 11:40 AM
horizontal rule
89

At the very least, I'll now get a chuckle whenever I hear "Forever in blue jeans."


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 06- 8-15 11:40 AM
horizontal rule
90

88: Lindsey Davis.

http://www.garycorby.com/2010/10/garos-garum-ketchup-of-ancient-world.html?m=1


Posted by: clew | Link to this comment | 06- 8-15 11:46 AM
horizontal rule
91

You can still buy garum, or something that's maybe like it and is Italian. It's not weird at all if you are anchovy-tolerant, which you should be, delicious on vegetables. We got some about a year ago and I use it pretty often as a condiment.


Posted by: TRO | Link to this comment | 06- 8-15 11:55 AM
horizontal rule
92

Here's the thing I have.


Posted by: TRO | Link to this comment | 06- 8-15 11:56 AM
horizontal rule
93

$9 for San Marzano canned tomatoes?


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 06- 8-15 11:59 AM
horizontal rule
94

I have a cookbook compiling recipes from classical antiquity, and a lot of the dishes call for liquamen or garum. I've substituted patis or Vietnamese fish sauce; pretty tasty.


Posted by: jms | Link to this comment | 06- 8-15 12:33 PM
horizontal rule
95

93

I was there recently, and paid almost $18 for a reuben. I would have been tempted by some of the delicacies but they were all well out of my price range. One of the jams looked good but it was $20.


Posted by: Buttercup | Link to this comment | 06- 8-15 12:34 PM
horizontal rule
96

82 to 86/87.


Posted by: clew | Link to this comment | 06- 8-15 2:18 PM
horizontal rule
97

Such distinction as was made seems to have been: muria, the brine; garum, the flavored oil; halec, the sludge left over; but this, as with many such distinctions, may not have been made in practice, and probably varied over the centuries. See Browne's Miscellany Tract Queries Relating to Fishes, Birds, Insects and the note therein on the sauces. Pliny, HN ix.66, describes garum or alec (in Holland's somewhat wrong-headed but immortal translation, "that dripping or gravie ... that commeth of fishes when they pine and corrupt").


Posted by: nosflow | Link to this comment | 06- 8-15 4:47 PM
horizontal rule
98

Isn't it thought that the Romans liked salty food because they all had lead poisoning from their cookware? I dunno how salty garum is, but it sounds like it might be.


Posted by: Natilo Paennim | Link to this comment | 06- 8-15 5:04 PM
horizontal rule
99

I thought the lead poisoning thesis had been pretty well debunked (that is, yes for sure the Romans used lead, but not at levels to cause general lead poisoning, and were aware of the issue despite having an artificial sweetener (!) made out of lead). Also does lead poisoning make you crave salty anchovy-based food?

Sometimes I wonder things like how Nosflow happened on the piece in 97, and then I just realize that the world is a big, wonderful place.


Posted by: TRO | Link to this comment | 06- 8-15 5:20 PM
horizontal rule
100

One thing that I learned from my kid's ancient Rome picture book, and I think that someone mentioned here recently, was that urban Romans didn't cook at home, except for the very rich, because of the way living quarters were set up and the risk of fire -- basically all meals were at the ancient equivalent of pizzerias.* Having a nice salty condiment to splash on your crap food probably worked for them for the same reasons it works for fast food restaurants today.

*sufficient explanation for decline right there.


Posted by: TRO | Link to this comment | 06- 8-15 5:23 PM
horizontal rule
101

||

I've put some before-and-after pictures from my program on Flickr.

|>


Posted by: Minivet | Link to this comment | 06- 8-15 5:24 PM
horizontal rule
102

Another militaristic, sport-obsessed, lazy, corrupt society, fed on bready fast food, populated with slaves who were too brainwashed to question their vastly unequal status, ruled by plutocrats and a Senate full of bloated buffoons.


Posted by: TRO | Link to this comment | 06- 8-15 5:28 PM
horizontal rule
103

Sometimes I wonder things like how Nosflow happened on the piece in 97,

I'm a big Thomas Browne fan.


Posted by: nosflow | Link to this comment | 06- 8-15 5:29 PM
horizontal rule
104

Does anyone write historical fiction that actually keeps up with historians? There's lots of novel in the view, now well-attested based on archaeology, that Rome didn't "fall" or rather it only fell for the elite. (Skeletons from after the fall are taller and better fed than before. Estimates of life expectancy based on Roman evidence fit actuarial tables from 20th century starving shitholes like the DRC.)


Posted by: Alex | Link to this comment | 06- 8-15 5:34 PM
horizontal rule
105

101 -- nice, impressive work.


Posted by: TRO | Link to this comment | 06- 8-15 5:34 PM
horizontal rule
106

(Skeletons from after the fall are taller and better fed than before. Estimates of life expectancy based on Roman evidence fit actuarial tables from 20th century starving shitholes like the DRC.)

This is one of my favorite factoids but it's true. In terms of freedom, health, and even technology* the dark ages were a better time for the 95% of people who weren't wealthy urbanites or urban commercial people, and even the cities didn't really collapse as much as people once thought. Fuck Rome!

*Mouldboard plow motherfuckers!


Posted by: TRO | Link to this comment | 06- 8-15 5:37 PM
horizontal rule
107

Ahimsub Terry Jones's Barbarians, which, while aimed at a popular audience, is still loaded with neat facts debunking the Romans and showing how much nicer the Celts and Goths and what not were.


Posted by: Natilo Paennim | Link to this comment | 06- 8-15 5:46 PM
horizontal rule
108

Huh. Someone called Thomas Carleton in Arlington, Mass has barbarism.org - he's probably on here.

Barbarism.com, though, belongs to someone in Karachi and I wonder if he means it a different way.


Posted by: Alex | Link to this comment | 06- 8-15 5:52 PM
horizontal rule
109

I enjoyed The Fall of Rome by Bryan Ward-Perkins, short and seemed firmly in the total-crank-with-nonetheless-a-point tradition. Lots of physical evidence surveyed to argue along the lines ajay sketches out. Discussion of mass production and trade of standardized goods super interesting.


Posted by: dairy queen | Link to this comment | 06- 8-15 5:57 PM
horizontal rule
110

Sorry Alex not ajay.


Posted by: dairy queen | Link to this comment | 06- 8-15 5:57 PM
horizontal rule
111

before-and-after pictures

Nice! How much of a weight difference is it between those two photos? (It is so hard to guess with weight.)


Posted by: Blume | Link to this comment | 06- 8-15 6:27 PM
horizontal rule
112

See the descriptions. Total loss is more at the moment.


Posted by: Minivet | Link to this comment | 06- 8-15 7:03 PM
horizontal rule
113

Oh duh. Thanks for the redirect!


Posted by: Blume | Link to this comment | 06- 8-15 7:06 PM
horizontal rule
114

Wow, Minivet! How is the emotional/social side of it?


Posted by: Thorn | Link to this comment | 06- 8-15 7:08 PM
horizontal rule
115

101: That's some serious change. Congrats!

On Rome: This intrigues me. I guess I'll give the book in 109 a look if it isn't too cranky.


Posted by: dalriata | Link to this comment | 06- 8-15 7:11 PM
horizontal rule
116

Don't read it, it's very tendentious, esp on the archaeology. Chris Wickham, Inheritance of Rome is the bestest and what you should read.


Posted by: TRO | Link to this comment | 06- 8-15 7:19 PM
horizontal rule
117

In addition to seeing some impressive thinning, I also saw J Robot's great pictures and, while reading old comment threads, figured out what 'idp' stands for. I had somehow missed that.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 06- 8-15 7:22 PM
horizontal rule
118

Huh, the thread has come around to being relevant to the post title again.


Posted by: teofilo | Link to this comment | 06- 8-15 7:43 PM
horizontal rule
119

It made me have a beer, cheese, and some green onions instead of a beer, cheese, and a pulled pork sandwich with mayo. Because healthy.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 06- 8-15 7:59 PM
horizontal rule
120

How far up on the green part can you go before you get to the poison?


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 06- 8-15 8:04 PM
horizontal rule
121

Wow, Minivet. Well done. What was your "program"?


Posted by: Barry Freed | Link to this comment | 06- 8-15 8:09 PM
horizontal rule
122

Eating the whole green part of a green onion.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 06- 8-15 8:15 PM
horizontal rule
123

116: enjoying the intro. I'll go with that, since I haven't acquired a very strong taste for archeological discourse yet (although I ver much enjoyed Cunliffe's Ancient Celts).

J Robot's pictures were very nice, but I think I'll stop checking the Flickr feed for a while. At least on my work machine. I will never know the secret of idp's initials.


Posted by: dalriata | Link to this comment | 06- 8-15 8:15 PM
horizontal rule
124

114: Emotionally, not a lot going on - I spent a week or two feeling chronically ecstatic, now more leveled off, still happy. Socially, I am now less walled off by meal substitutes.


Posted by: Minivet | Link to this comment | 06- 8-15 9:45 PM
horizontal rule
125

High five, Minivet.


Posted by: k-sky | Link to this comment | 06- 9-15 12:10 AM
horizontal rule
126

Huh, I think these pictures are great---and I think the self-aware sardonic smiles of the subjects is part of what makes them great. To me it says, "yeah, we have a shit ton of trash, and it's kind of gross, but we're willing to pose with it to fuel the conversation about how to deal with it, b/c this is a systemic issue, not just a household one."

Where's the food waste? Well, if you eat enough pre-packaged food, you have very little food waste left over. Usually we have so little trash-trash we frequently go for weeks without actually bothering to roll out the grey trash only bin, some recycling (mostly office paper)---and the big problem is dealing with city compost (inevitably something gets stuck to to the kitchen compost bin and has to be scraped into the city bin, and that's unpleasant) and the worm compost (I generally refuse to have anything to do with that b/c I'm paranoid about accidentally killing the worms). My boyfriend's been out of town for about a month, and I was kind of ill for about a week a week ago, so I lazily stuck to all frozen food and packaged snacks and instant soup, rather than exhaust myself cooking for one. When I took out the "trash" I was discombobulated--there was almost no compost, way more recycling and enough trash to justify rolling out the trash-trash bin.

But Berkeley has an nonprofit recycling and gardening center (The Ecology Center) and a big mountain of city compost that gardeners fight over every spring. El Cerrito has a municipal recycling center that is, in a weird way, something of a center of civic pride and gathering---it's located at the base of a beautiful canyon, and its book exchange pile was once known as a sort of dork's pick up spot. Neither magically started out that way. They've been building up for years, and years of people volunteering at the Ecology Center, working with the Sierra Club, working with the the League of Women Voters, going to city council meetings, etc. Food waste and much paper (like the greasy bottom of the pizza box) and compostable "plastics" (like many of the take out containers) can all be composted along with the yard clippings. In fact most people's compost piles otherwise suffer from too high a nitrogen to carbon ratio. Cans and bottles can be recycled. Even some plastic can be recycled---other plastic goods, fleeces, etc. Activism and volunteerism on the local level to get these local systems in place, and maintain the, is worthwhile and productive. Photos like this, viewed in contrasted with photos where this stuff has been sorted and recycled/composted, could be a perfectly excellent tool for communicating *why* your local municipality+community needs to cooperate to make a more structure waste management system. Households can't recycle on their own without systemic change, but the systems are, mostly, local.

The problem is the plastic that *can't* be recycled, and the energy cost of recycling (vs. composting). There are companies that are switching to make packaging that's more sustainable. A more organized movement of supporting those companies and boycotting companies that use those horrible plastic clamshell packages and the like would make a big difference---and again, pictures like this seem like potential good measure towards fueling that movement.

If you got a place like, say, suburban West Bengal, where there is no recycling at all, and very little municipal waste services in general, and there are now western levels of packaging, and so all that trash ends up everywhere or gets incinerated right there, it's very depressing and makes one suddenly appreciate all the civil society and volunteerism and local activism and local good government that has gone into changing the waste stream in at least some parts of the US. And also the fact that local municipal government and local civil society is at least somewhat tractable to, and accessible to, local do-gooders.


Posted by: Ile | Link to this comment | 06- 9-15 12:41 AM
horizontal rule
127

on garum, Vietnamese fish sauce is a good substitute as it's made by exactly the same method, as far as anyone knows. This article by somebody who made her own, with a link to a description of the process. She says it came out saltier and fishier that shop bought nuoc mam, but that may just be the way she made it. I suppose there would be minor brand differences in commercial garum in antiquity.

I endorse TRO's recommendation of Wickham, which is probably the locus classicus for the period for this decade and the next. Read Ward Perkins, but after you've absorbed a discussion of what's known as the "Walter Goffart thesis", which is the most extreme respectable version of the 'Rome didn't really fall' approach. Ward Perkins isn't mad. The archaeological evidence has changed how people look at the period; also, WP walks back the most extreme implications of his thesis in the last section.


Posted by: chris y | Link to this comment | 06- 9-15 2:00 AM
horizontal rule
128

Heston Blumenthal made garum on some TV show, following an ancient recipe. He said it was really nice, iirc.


Posted by: nattarGcM ttaM | Link to this comment | 06- 9-15 4:44 AM
horizontal rule
129

127: In my experience there's a very noticeable difference between brands of fish sauce too. I'm guessing it's the sort of process where minor differences at the beginning have big effects at the end.


Posted by: MHPH | Link to this comment | 06- 9-15 6:16 AM
horizontal rule
130

If I knew for a certainty that a man was coming to my house with the conscious design of doing me goodraising awareness, I should run for my life


Posted by: idp | Link to this comment | 06- 9-15 7:06 AM
horizontal rule
131

The best part of Ward-Perkins' book is definitely the part at the beginning where he gets into a magnificent lather about the explanatory plaques at the St. Albans museum (intended audience 8-12 year olds). The next best part is the really interesting bits about trade and manufacturing. After that you're down to the pathos of the last dude walking over the alps to collect the outpost's pay packet, or something like it. Basically W-P walked straight out of a Pym novel and his book is very entertaining. Plus short!


Posted by: dairy queen | Link to this comment | 06- 9-15 7:33 AM
horizontal rule
132

If Rome didn't fakk, was it not really a malarial plain of vine-covered ruins when the Enlightenment got back to it? Piranesi: faking it or really faking it?


Posted by: clew | Link to this comment | 06- 9-15 9:40 AM
horizontal rule
133

/s/fakk/fall/g


Posted by: clew | Link to this comment | 06- 9-15 9:43 AM
horizontal rule
134

Most historians are mosquitos.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 06- 9-15 9:58 AM
horizontal rule
135

132. It had been a malarial plain when Romulus laid the foundation stone, when Julius Caesar hung out there and when it was sacked by the Goths; so no change there.

The city contracted substantially after it ceased to be the imperial capital in the 4th century, and during the middle ages the monumental buildings were used as quarries for building material by the people who still lived in it. There were probably plenty of vine covered ruins for Piranesi.

Obviously nobody disputes that the western empire ceased to exist as a political entity in the late 5th century. The debate is over how violently it ceased to exist, and how much its ceasing to exist actually affected the day to day life of the average Joe.


Posted by: chris y | Link to this comment | 06- 9-15 10:02 AM
horizontal rule
136

fakking Rome


Posted by: Barry Freed | Link to this comment | 06- 9-15 10:02 AM
horizontal rule
137

Fewer, larger people? (Unless ag tech and Georgic egalitarianism made up for international food imports right away, which seems just possible.)


Posted by: clew | Link to this comment | 06- 9-15 10:14 AM
horizontal rule
138

Late Roman elite dining was sort of famously wasteful. Plus, slave importation would have stopped with (or before) food importation so fewer people to feed.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 06- 9-15 10:23 AM
horizontal rule
139

Still, I bet the transition meant several very bad years and various dead people.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 06- 9-15 10:24 AM
horizontal rule
140

137 -- definitely larger people, with disputes about just about how many "fewer" in the countryside (there were definitely fewer people in some cities, though more in others). And also definite general improvements in agricultural technology (over about a 400 year period of diffusion, so not like overnight) and definitely greater egalitarianism and empowerment for individual rural villages, though as you say less international trade in food (though the scale of the decline there, while real, is also debated). Of course this is all subject to substantial regional variation throughout the Western Empire as a whole.


Posted by: TRO | Link to this comment | 06- 9-15 10:26 AM
horizontal rule
141

I have a personal crank theory that in pre-modern societies there's ordinarily an inverse relationship between the richness of a civilization's elite culture and how well its peasants are doing. If growth is slow to non-exsitent and elites are funded by extracting value from agricultural workers, basically the better off and richer the elites are, the more brutally they have to take surplus from a large but but more brutally oppressed population. Hence more temples and aqueducts (or maybe even gothic cathedrals or castles or whatever) and more poetry and plays and what have you are directly related to most of the population being worse off. If patronage pays for culture, and the money to fund patronage is basically extractive from a large agricultural population, there will be an inverse relationship between the material richness of a pre-modern civilization's culture and how well its average citizen is doing.


Posted by: TRO | Link to this comment | 06- 9-15 10:48 AM
horizontal rule
142

W-P's book is interesting on precisely that point, when he discusses the archaeological evidence for changes in e.g. farmhouse building materials and the skill sets available to manipulate them.


Posted by: dairy queen | Link to this comment | 06- 9-15 11:01 AM
horizontal rule
143

According to historical economists, there's a correlation in pre-modern societies between the level of urbanization and average living standards. So it's possible for the average level to be higher, which gives the elite scope to skim more. Renaissance Italy would probably be an example.


Posted by: Walt Someguy | Link to this comment | 06- 9-15 11:04 AM
horizontal rule
144

I don't think that's nuts, actually -- maybe not a perfectly reliable relationship, but it sounds at least plausible.

I think there's also, in the relevant period, something that looks very unfamiliar in the modern world, where more peace can mean less prosperity. That is, where you've got a strong central state, you can get a population of malnourished peasants getting wealth extracted from them in a fairly orderly way, but at pretty low risk of violent death. Where there's less centralized power, your population might end up being better fed, but also likelier to have their heads split open with axes. It's kind of hard to take a pick between the two options, which means being worse off.


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 06- 9-15 11:06 AM
horizontal rule
145

The strength of the central state would depend on upon potential competitor and the importance of fixed resources (e.g. hydrolic despotism).


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 06- 9-15 11:09 AM
horizontal rule
146

143 -- yeah, I already knew that my crank theory is mostly wrong, as a general rule, for that reason. But there's still something to the crankitude that I will discover through tireless research more speculation and popular-level reading. Mostly its that growth is so low that your pre-modern ruler can choose to ratchet up the oppression as a way of taking more surplus and do nearly as well (and much more intentionally) than by just hoping that average standard of living improves.


Posted by: TRO | Link to this comment | 06- 9-15 11:16 AM
horizontal rule
147

tireless research


Posted by: TRO | Link to this comment | 06- 9-15 11:17 AM
horizontal rule
148

To add to 144, very big cities in antiquity: Rome, Constantinople, Alexandria, Antioch were largely vanity projects for the rulers or the elite class. The size of their populations was quite disproportionate to the level of economic activity. So not merely were there vast bureaucracies to support, there were hundreds of thousands of unemployed or underemployed people who had to be fed to prevent them rioting.

The population of Rome in, say 300 ad consumed most of the surplus grain grown in north Africa that wasn't consumed by the local elite. When the western emperors move their capital to Trier/Milan/Ravenna the population of Rome fell, but the key moment was when the Vandals occupied Africa, so that the state grain ships stopped coming and the Roman poor either starved or had to go back to the land. This was obviously good for the African peasantry who had a lot of extra food available.


Posted by: chris y | Link to this comment | 06- 9-15 11:21 AM
horizontal rule
149

There is a theory that governments were first created when a subset of marauding raiders got tired of marauding and instead of going around stealing everything from different people, they became "stationary bandits" who always stole from the same people but were careful to leave enough for them the people to survive and reproduce.

I'm not aware of how well this is supported by empirical evidence.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 06- 9-15 11:22 AM
horizontal rule
150

||
Come enjoy the majestic beauty of scenic AlaskAAUUUGH!
|>


Posted by: MHPH | Link to this comment | 06- 9-15 11:23 AM
horizontal rule
151

I guess I don't know what evidence they would find except circumstantial.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 06- 9-15 11:30 AM
horizontal rule
152

150: SURFEIT.


Posted by: Opinionated King | Link to this comment | 06- 9-15 11:31 AM
horizontal rule
153

|| So, I've got this case at the highest court in a neighboring state, and a few weeks ago they sent both parties a 'save the date' notice asking us to block 5 dates at the end of August/beginning September, and let them know if we were unavailable any of those dates. We were both available each of the 5 days. I just got the scheduling order: not only is the hearing going to be 10 days earlier than the earliest saved date, it's going to be held at the law school on the second day of new student orientation. For the next 3 years, professors will be saying remember that guy who got slow roasted by the Supreme Court back during Orientation? Don't do it like that. |>


Posted by: CharleyCarp | Link to this comment | 06- 9-15 11:32 AM
horizontal rule
154

150: No need for pause/play. That is one shocking photo. I can't wait to see it in my nightmares.


Posted by: Jesus McQueen | Link to this comment | 06- 9-15 11:33 AM
horizontal rule
155

Obviously nobody disputes that the western empire ceased to exist as a political entity in the late 5th century.

And what is Anatoly Fomenko, chopped liver?


Posted by: Minivet | Link to this comment | 06- 9-15 11:35 AM
horizontal rule
156

Dear Mr. Khan,

I have a new idea. Instead of killing everybody like we did in Samarkand, how about we just kill enough to scare the rest. And not steal all the food/burn everything. Then, when they grow more food next year, we can come back and take that. This would mean we could take the same amount of goods without having to ride farther and farther away each year.

Sincerely,
The Members of Hemorrhoidal Horse Archers Local 156


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 06- 9-15 11:36 AM
horizontal rule
157

Oh, it's just the week before. Still, why did they even ask?


Posted by: CharleyCarp | Link to this comment | 06- 9-15 11:36 AM
horizontal rule
158

156: Love this.

It was probably written by Mr. Peabody.


Posted by: peep | Link to this comment | 06- 9-15 11:39 AM
horizontal rule
159

148 is interesting. I liked Inheritance of Rome a lot as well. I've read in a couple of places that many latifundia were also basically motivated by vanity rather than profit.

Chris, can you recommend any reading on Diocletian's economic reforms or that supports the idea that Constantinople was inefficient in the same way as Rome? Trade crossroads there should have been considerable, everything I've read about Byzantium is pretty old, doesn't adress any specifics.


Posted by: lw | Link to this comment | 06- 9-15 11:40 AM
horizontal rule
160

156 in great.

150 reminds me of the pineal gland sucking appendage in From Beyond


Posted by: Barry Freed | Link to this comment | 06- 9-15 11:42 AM
horizontal rule
161

||

NMM to "Headless Body in Topless Bar" headline writer Vince Musetto

|>


Posted by: Barry Freed | Link to this comment | 06- 9-15 11:46 AM
horizontal rule
162

I thought 159.2 was addressed in Inheritance of Rome itself, if not it's something I'd picked up from elsewhere. But late-antique Constantinople before the 8th century was definitely a vanity imperial project largely controlled by (I think) Egyptian grain; once that dried up after the Muslim conquest, Constantinople had a huge and precipitous population decline.


Posted by: TRO | Link to this comment | 06- 9-15 11:46 AM
horizontal rule
163

SEVENTH century.


Posted by: TRO | Link to this comment | 06- 9-15 11:47 AM
horizontal rule
164

Or, really, after the Persians conquered and then the Arabs conquered. The 7th century sucked for the Byzantines, but they deserved it because they were dicks.


Posted by: TRO | Link to this comment | 06- 9-15 11:54 AM
horizontal rule
165

141 et seq.: There's some interesting work relating average income in pre-industrial societies to inequality, and specifically how close the societies came to the maximal inequality compatible with keeping the peasantry alive (PDF). Most of the data is naturally from the early modern period, but that paper does include guestimates for both the Roman Empire under Augustus and Byzantium c. 1000; the later was poorer and closer to the maximum inequality frontier than the former (though not by much).


Posted by: Cosma Shalizi | Link to this comment | 06- 9-15 12:01 PM
horizontal rule
166

the maximal inequality compatible with keeping the peasantry alive

This sounds suspiciously like something the Koch brothers would be interested in learning more about.


Posted by: AcademicLurker | Link to this comment | 06- 9-15 12:07 PM
horizontal rule
167

162. ?? I had thought that the main problem for Byzantium was the Seljuks, then later the more capable Osmanli. Leo III defeated the Umayyads, and there were Byzantine rulers in Syria after that. The Seljuks didn't get that much of Anatolia.

I'm not that sure about broader context, which is why I'm asking-- basically, seeking good reading for Byzantine-Abbasid conflict and Byzantine - Persian- Turkish conflict and trade. But even if Constantinople shrank, Byzantium was a significant empire until the Seljuks started seizing territory.


Posted by: lw | Link to this comment | 06- 9-15 12:07 PM
horizontal rule
168

166: Optimist.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 06- 9-15 12:08 PM
horizontal rule
169

167 -- Wickham says that Constantinople went from about 500,000 in the time of Justinian (550) to maybe 40,000 by 700 or so. The 7th century really was a period of near-total collapse for the empire, though population estimates are all over the place. Constantinople had recovered a lot by the 9th and 10th centuries, as had the empire as a whole, but its economy and society were totally transformed by the intervening period, and it probably never got back to the level of the era of Justinian. The empire as a whole was a third of the size in 950 as in 550.


Posted by: TRO | Link to this comment | 06- 9-15 12:21 PM
horizontal rule
170

500,000 in the time of Justinian (550) to maybe 40,000 by 700 or so.

Did the plague that hit in 540 and then kept recurring for a while do most of that?


Posted by: AcademicLurker | Link to this comment | 06- 9-15 12:26 PM
horizontal rule
171

170 -- maybe, but as I say Constantinople also lost its main source of food in the period and food was state-supplied then. But I am not an expert!

The paper linked in 165 is really really great. I love the concept of the "inequality possibility frontier."


Posted by: TRO | Link to this comment | 06- 9-15 12:36 PM
horizontal rule
172

I'll reread some stuff- Leo III toook power after a period of anarchy right around 700. He defeated a considerable Umayyad army, Wikipedia claims at least 80k strong.

I don't see how that can be consistent with a total population of 40k. Leo III is a polarizing figure-- basically I understand him as leader of one faction in a brutal civil war. That means contemporary sources will have a bias about him and about the preceding anarchy. Wickham is a good historian, obvs, I'll reread what he says.


Posted by: lw | Link to this comment | 06- 9-15 12:37 PM
horizontal rule
173

I think the 40,000 must be the population of the city, not the empire.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 06- 9-15 12:38 PM
horizontal rule
174

City, not empire.


Posted by: TRO | Link to this comment | 06- 9-15 12:41 PM
horizontal rule
175

Righ, but even taking ancient sources with a grain of salt, the Umayyads mobilized a large fleet and army to attack Constantinople, Arab as well as Greek sources for that. Leo held the city against this attack. If the total population of the city in 700, just before Leo got there, was really only 40k, then Leo III instantiated Halfordismo.


Posted by: lw | Link to this comment | 06- 9-15 12:45 PM
horizontal rule
176

The source materials on that siege (i.e. Wikipedia) are interesting. Leo had lots of help from Bulgarians and the Christian crews of Arab ships. Plus, really high walls.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 06- 9-15 12:52 PM
horizontal rule
177

|| 153 -- So, one of the clerks must be a lurker, because they just rescheduled the case. Probably figuring I'd dissuade the students before the first day of class. |>


Posted by: CharleyCarp | Link to this comment | 06- 9-15 1:46 PM
horizontal rule
178

We are aware of all internet traditions.


Posted by: Opinionated State Supreme Court Clerk | Link to this comment | 06- 9-15 2:49 PM
horizontal rule
179

Note to self: if I want to learn some history, I should probably just do a quick pause/play here first to learn what all the latest scholarship is.


Posted by: dalriata | Link to this comment | 06- 9-15 3:09 PM
horizontal rule
180

Everybody arguing about history here is just looking at Wikipedia before commenting.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 06- 9-15 3:13 PM
horizontal rule
181

Wait, we're supposed to do that before commenting now?


Posted by: MHPH | Link to this comment | 06- 9-15 3:38 PM
horizontal rule
182

Don't spoil the mystique. I mean, that's what I'm doing, but I assume everyone else is an offhanded polymath.


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 06- 9-15 3:39 PM
horizontal rule
183

I don't even remember how I did graduate school without it.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 06- 9-15 3:55 PM
horizontal rule
184

I think at some point in my life I must have just sat down and read books.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 06- 9-15 3:58 PM
horizontal rule
185

But that just doesn't sound plausible.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 06- 9-15 4:03 PM
horizontal rule
186

Sometimes I look at other sites, such as my favorite, Yahoo! Answers.


Posted by: TRO | Link to this comment | 06- 9-15 4:08 PM
horizontal rule
187

For example.


Posted by: TRO | Link to this comment | 06- 9-15 4:11 PM
horizontal rule
188

Today I had lunch early and then got stuck on a long phone call until after I meant to leave work, so by the time I got home I was starving. The fastest thing I could throw together out of what was in my kitchen was a pile of kale, some scrambled eggs, and bacon. I just thought I should let TRO know I took a tiny step toward Halfordismo.


Posted by: essear | Link to this comment | 06- 9-15 4:44 PM
horizontal rule
189

Why not just stop at a bar on the way home? I did that and I saw a woman who looked like the young, hot version of one of my enemy neighbours. I couldn't think of a polite way to ask if they were related, so I just drank and left.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 06- 9-15 5:22 PM
horizontal rule
190

neighbours

Wait, are you one of those people who adopt an English accent when they're drunk?


Posted by: Jesus McQueen | Link to this comment | 06- 9-15 5:30 PM
horizontal rule
191

It was supposed to read "elderly neighbors". I'm not sure why my phone went British.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 06- 9-15 5:34 PM
horizontal rule
192

189: Middle class sexual fantasies are weird! Stupid sexy Flanders.

190: I'm one of those! One of my top twenty most annoying tics.


Posted by: dalriata | Link to this comment | 06- 9-15 6:15 PM
horizontal rule
193

its book exchange pile was once known as a sort of dork's pick up spot

There's a local recycling center here that has a book exchange. I wondered about it, but then figured it was for people who were about to recycle books, to give them an option that didn't destroy the books. But my new theory is that someone was trying to start a dork's pick up spot.


Posted by: Stanley | Link to this comment | 06- 9-15 6:21 PM
horizontal rule
194

150: Huh, I'm surprised I hadn't heard about that. I was even in Fairbanks last week.


Posted by: teofilo | Link to this comment | 06- 9-15 6:42 PM
horizontal rule
195

Maybe you're not very attentive. Have you tried ADD drugs? I'm not sure which one is best. So start with dexidrine.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 06- 9-15 6:50 PM
horizontal rule
196

This is kinda neat:

http://flyer.psychedelicencounteringthedivine.org/


Posted by: Natilo Paennim | Link to this comment | 06- 9-15 6:58 PM
horizontal rule
197

194: The story did involve birds. Maybe you just blocked it out of your memory to escape the horror (of the birds and possibly of the bitey eye-worms).


Posted by: Stanley | Link to this comment | 06- 9-15 7:06 PM
horizontal rule
198

I was probably just preoccupied by worrying about the state budget.


Posted by: teofilo | Link to this comment | 06- 9-15 7:19 PM
horizontal rule
199

I really like potatoes. It's not just a "ground apple" -- apples are potatoes of the air!


Posted by: Natilo Paennim | Link to this comment | 06- 9-15 9:52 PM
horizontal rule
200

And wasn't my Ambrose Bierce/potato pastiche funny?


Posted by: Natilo Paennim | Link to this comment | 06- 9-15 9:54 PM
horizontal rule
201

191. Enemy neighbours sound much more fun. I recommend large numbers of Bulgarians and Christian sailors. Plus, really high walls.


Posted by: chris y | Link to this comment | 06-10-15 2:21 AM
horizontal rule
202

you guise, I need to push back on the "poor people have lots of possessions" thing. drive along a road in indonesia or lane in india sometime at night--you can see all the way into everyone's house. even comparatively rich people with a concrete block house and a fluorescent ceiling light and a TV often don't have a sofa. people that live in a corrugated-iron roofed shack don't have jack shit. people with dirt floors don't have lots of items weighing them down IME. they can see violins on tv at the local hang-out though.


Posted by: alameida | Link to this comment | 06-10-15 4:42 AM
horizontal rule
203

||

Completely unexpected and shocking use of the n-word by a colleague just now. Not someone in my department but he was giving me and another colleague a lift home and we were talking about cars and we got on the subject of shitty American cars from the late 70s and 80s and he said how the n****rs like to drive really big cars and not believing he'd said that I came back "excuse me?" and he repeated it and then said, "you know, black people." He's not a native English speaker, not an Arabic speaker either, he's from southern Europe. I told him that you just never ever say that word in English - literary usage a la Mark Twain or Ishmael Reed to the side - it's the ugliest word there is. He said he didn't know and I believe him, he's very young and a very nice guy but wow. I'm thinking he's probably heard it from other (white) Americans before and thought nothing of it. I hope not. Or maybe he saw Django Unchained recently and got the wrong idea. Weird and disconcerting.

|>


Posted by: Barry Freed | Link to this comment | 06-10-15 5:19 AM
horizontal rule
204

FWIW, in my experience, poor Scottish people, do quite often have a lot of possessions. Of course, they are pretty rich by global standards. But it's certainly true that a lot of skint Knifecrimean people have a lot of crap stashed about.


Posted by: nattarGcM ttaM | Link to this comment | 06-10-15 5:20 AM
horizontal rule
205

I think it depends a lot on how available stuff is in the country. [Relatively] poor people in rich countries with a lot of consumer goods will maybe hoard. So you might see an inverse correlation. [Absolutely] poor people in poor countries with few goods will have almost literally nothing - in rural Madagascar, you would not believe how important items of clothing were to people. Particularly shoes. There, amount of stuff is very obviously proportional to wealth.

China, which I think might be Buttercup's example, is a sort-of special case. For one thing, the megacities are first world, with the same pattern of consumption. And for another, a huge amount of goods are produced in China. So I would imagine that people in even the poorest regions have much more access to "stuff" than their equivalents in countries which don't have such developed cities and/or manufacturing bases, even if they are as poor in absolute terms.


Posted by: Seeds | Link to this comment | 06-10-15 5:42 AM
horizontal rule
206

Now I know two tings about rural Madagascar. (The other one is about lemurs.)


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 06-10-15 5:45 AM
horizontal rule
207

"in absolute terms" would probably have been better expressed as "in other regards" - earnings, capabilities, etc


Posted by: Seeds | Link to this comment | 06-10-15 5:46 AM
horizontal rule
208

Spill it, Moby


Posted by: Seeds | Link to this comment | 06-10-15 5:47 AM
horizontal rule
209

That they exist in rural Madagascar is pretty much it.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 06-10-15 5:52 AM
horizontal rule
210

Also most of the world's supply of chameleon and baobab tree species! And lots of other weird and wonderful flora and fauna.

Visit before it all disappears! And donate $$$ to NGOs like the one I worked for!


Posted by: Seeds | Link to this comment | 06-10-15 5:55 AM
horizontal rule
211

I probably don't have the budget to do both. Or either. I should have gone to look at the Lemur Center when I was in Durham. At the time, nobody would go with me because I keep making jokes about it being a restaurant.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 06-10-15 5:57 AM
horizontal rule
212

the megacities are first world if you have the right hukou.

204: That's consistent with poverty here, and I expect elsewhere in the first world. It encourages hoarding.


Posted by: dalriata | Link to this comment | 06-10-15 6:05 AM
horizontal rule
213

Did you joke that they would eat the lemurs, or be turned into delicious bananas and fed to them?


Posted by: Seeds | Link to this comment | 06-10-15 6:06 AM
horizontal rule
214

212:

First world cities also have incredible levels of poverty - I'm not suggesting that everyone in Beijing spends all day in air-conditioned shopping malls and can access healthcare. But then, I wouldn't suggest that for Washington DC, either.


Posted by: Seeds | Link to this comment | 06-10-15 6:09 AM
horizontal rule
215

213: Whenever somebody would say they went there, I would ask what lemur tasted like.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 06-10-15 6:10 AM
horizontal rule
216

I think there's a significant difference between being poor in DC and being a migrant laborer in Beijing.


Posted by: dalriata | Link to this comment | 06-10-15 6:12 AM
horizontal rule
217

Tenrecs ftw!


Posted by: chris y | Link to this comment | 06-10-15 6:13 AM
horizontal rule
218

The wikipedia page (I'm not good at clicking links, but pretty good about looking up words I don't know) helpfully mentions that it is difficult to correctly prepare tenrec.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 06-10-15 6:15 AM
horizontal rule
219

Ahimsub my great aunt and uncle, farmers all their lives on a small Maine farm. Not "poor" of course, they owned their own land, but especially when they had kids at home, I'm sure they would have qualified as low-income. So when they died, their kids found every single electrical device they'd ever purchased, which, having ceased to function, they'd put back in the original box and stored in the barn. Very different relationship to stuff than what we would think of as normative. They were also big weekend drunks, not sure if that had any correlation.


Posted by: Natilo Paennim | Link to this comment | 06-10-15 6:16 AM
horizontal rule
220

216: Fair point.

Relatedly, my ex-roommate has just finished working for an NGO that works specifically with migrant laborers in Beijing (I'm not making this up, I promise). Whereas I'm living in Beijing, but haven't spent much time outside the fifth ring-road. We met in Madagascar, so I'm going to ask his opinion on the "stuff" question and I'll post if he gets back to me.

218: Unfortunately it's not difficult to catch them. Children would often be tasked with waiting outside their burrows until the tenrecs woke up, at which point the tenrecs would run straight out into their hands.


Posted by: Seeds | Link to this comment | 06-10-15 6:32 AM
horizontal rule
221

Are they good?


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 06-10-15 6:33 AM
horizontal rule
222

Dunno, I mostly ate oysters, steak and "Apollo" instant noodles out there.


Posted by: Seeds | Link to this comment | 06-10-15 6:44 AM
horizontal rule
223

That's an entire order you'll probably never get another chance to eat again.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 06-10-15 6:50 AM
horizontal rule
224

True, although I discovered that I would trade almost any other foodstuff for cheese.


Posted by: Seeds | Link to this comment | 06-10-15 6:53 AM
horizontal rule
225

216: Yes, it's possible that the social mobility in Beijing is greater.


Posted by: Doug | Link to this comment | 06-10-15 6:54 AM
horizontal rule
226

225: Yes, again, if you have the right hukou. If you're from rural Shaanxi good luck. If you're a poor African-American in DC--which is actually one of the better cities in terms of social mobility out of the bottom quintile--and DC isn't working for you, you could at least in theory move somewhere else--say, Atlanta, which surprisingly isn't as good as DC on social mobility--and not be permanently saddled with poor-person-from-DC-ness.

I agree that once you pass that barrier you're probably right. Although China is in massive flux and that might not be true in the longer run.


Posted by: dalriata | Link to this comment | 06-10-15 7:28 AM
horizontal rule
227

|| Lawyers: this is bullshit, right? |>


Posted by: dalriata | Link to this comment | 06-10-15 8:31 AM
horizontal rule
228

China also has a significant enough difference in cost of living that being dirt poor in Beijing can still be enough to live comfortably in one of the poorer inland provinces. Where I lived, most people would work in Shanghai or Hangzhou as migrant laborers for two long stints (one before marriage and children, one after), and then retire to their enormous house they had built with their savings over the years.* Some people would stay in the area, where life was more pleasant (no pollution, slower pace of life), but the pay was much worse. And the city also drew in people from even poorer parts of the province, although pay was low and cost of living was high enough that people who could would try to get to a big eastern seaboard city. For really poor people, I would agree that access to stuff is mostly access to other people's waste, and even a poorer area has enough stuff that there's plenty to go around, if we're talking about sheer quantity. Where I was, people in absolute poverty also couldn't afford to buy stuff, outside of the most basic necessities, and took very good care of what they did have (e.g. darning nylon ankle socks.)

I'm sure there are still parts of the world where absolute poverty means absolute lack of stuff, but I would guess that this will decrease with large-scale manufacturing moving into South & Southeast Asia, and China investing like crazy in Africa. I know from friends who do work with charity that there's a problem of people in the US assuming poor people in undeveloped countries will be grateful for anything, so they donate worn out toys and clothes, and then charity workers have to throw them out. Again, maybe it's not true in Madagascar, but there is enough cheap clothing in the world that the global second hand and charity markets are oversaturated and most of what we donate gets thrown away in the end.

*Interestingly, lots of people would still cram all their stuff into their first floor. So the first floor had floor to ceiling piles of junk, and the second two floors were completely empty. Lots of times people would also keep their old house as a farming implement storage shed, and then store all their newer crap in their new house.

It's also weird in China that house size is a U-shaped curve, where the poorest and richest have the biggest homes, and people in the middle live in smaller apartments. Rural homes in China are massive, and where I live (a "rural" city), the large houses within the city were by and large in rural townhouse style and mostly built by displaced peasants, some of whom supported themselves by renting out rooms on the cheap. Where I live is famous for preserving most of its old architecture, so now you have wealthy Shanghainese and Beijingers buying up 100+ year farmhouses and turning them into country houses. Housing prices for old homes have increased about 15-fold in the past 15 years in certain areas.


Posted by: Buttercup | Link to this comment | 06-10-15 10:20 AM
horizontal rule
229

227 -- it is, but figuring out precisely why (or if! but I think it is) it is illegal or unconstitutional is a very interesting and not particularly clear-cut issue.


Posted by: TRO | Link to this comment | 06-10-15 10:52 AM
horizontal rule
230

224: like that dude in treasure island!


Posted by: alameida | Link to this comment | 06-10-15 5:59 PM
horizontal rule
231

228: that's kind of like in the rural philippines. we built a house for our previous maid on property she owned outright as an inheritance from her dad. it's a pretty sweet little house (though the western-style kitchen cabinetry she installed got fucked hard by flooding from a cyclone, much to her dismay--and only in for six months). real toilet (fancy!), cinder block and stucco walls, tiled roof. she owned other property too, which she sold. there's so little work there that even someone like her, who owns land and had two years of post-secondary schooling, could still only support her family by working thousands of km away as a maid. in the case of her hometown (also my current maid's same barangay/neighborhood), people really do still want cast-off stuff. we buy m---- extra baggage allowance going home and also send man-high boxes of stuff (one is going out today.) people use husband x's old work shirts for rice-farming sun/mosquito protection. I have them made to measure periodically, they are just as cheap that way here. makes for mildly incongruous scenes. it's true that some of this may be down to our maids' unwillingness to throw anything away ever. it may not be an economically rational choice, were it not that I were paying shipping. when we moved from our house to our current place we sent SO MANY things to the philippines. the treasure in a way was the american girl dolls, endless clothes, and motherfucking furniture (did I not realize children grow up quickly?). there are about ten girls in m----'s town who got The Last Doll from the little princess. we combed their hair after spritzing water on it to make it perfect (this really works!), and packed each with a wardrobe. well, selfishly as a giver I liked that as the treasure, I know other things were more useful.

but in their barangay there are nice houses like my former maid's, and houses with dirt floors, like her sister's immediately adjacent--a cause of sibling strife, unfortunately. they decidedly don't have a lot of stuff in there. sheets and towels, a mattress/futon they share, a hammock for the youngest girl, a wok, two knives, spatula and wire basket thingie you fish fried foods out of boiling oil with, buckets and big chipped enamel-ware bowls for laundry, um...a fan? I think they're hooked into the electricity grid with some sketch extension. I think it's true that people hoard what they have, but up the social scale people are often tastelessly lavish rather than simply scandanavian. rich indonesian peoples houses look like someone got the "midas trump" power to turn everything they touch into hideous gilt over-stuffed jacquard-upholstered monstrosities.


Posted by: alameida | Link to this comment | 06-10-15 6:53 PM
horizontal rule