Re: Guest Post - Kirk Revisited

1

Have we not discussed this before?


Posted by: ajay | Link to this comment | 07-25-18 6:07 AM
horizontal rule
2

Nerd.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 07-25-18 6:10 AM
horizontal rule
3

Shhh.


Posted by: Mossy Character | Link to this comment | 07-25-18 6:10 AM
horizontal rule
4

Anyway, Star Trek V wasn't nearly as bad as I had been led to expect.


Posted by: Mossy Character | Link to this comment | 07-25-18 6:13 AM
horizontal rule
5

AIMHBP, I had to explain Star Trek II to my son because every time he complains about the Khan Academy homework, I go "Khaaaaan!"


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 07-25-18 6:13 AM
horizontal rule
6

1: Yes. It was interesting at the time.


Posted by: Cyrus | Link to this comment | 07-25-18 6:27 AM
horizontal rule
7

With reference to Paddington 2, though, this might be of interest:
http://refugeehistory.org/blog/2017/11/15/an-immigration-lawyer-reviews-paddington-2-life-in-the-hostile-environment


Posted by: ajay | Link to this comment | 07-25-18 6:29 AM
horizontal rule
8

I remember starting to read that before. I quickly came to the same conclusion as this time. It's long!

On the one hand this length means that I will never read it to the end. On the other hand, it is completely persuasive. If she can go on at that length on this topic, I feel it's safe to assume her assessment of the character of Captain Kirk on the original Star Trek series is correct.


Posted by: peep | Link to this comment | 07-25-18 6:30 AM
horizontal rule
9

If she can go on at that length on this topic, I feel it's safe to assume her assessment of the character of Captain Kirk on the original Star Trek series is correct.

I think this proves too much.


Posted by: Cyrus | Link to this comment | 07-25-18 6:55 AM
horizontal rule
10

I don't remember if I said this in the earlier thread, but IMO it's not just the contrast with Spock. I think Picard in tNG made Kirk retroactively seem more macho and less thoughtful than he actually was.


Posted by: AcademicLurker | Link to this comment | 07-25-18 7:13 AM
horizontal rule
11

I think this proves too much.

I can't decide if you are saying this proves I'm a fool, or it proves that I don't care that much about Star Trek.

Probably both.

I agree!


Posted by: peep | Link to this comment | 07-25-18 7:31 AM
horizontal rule
12

If she can go on at that length on this topic

I realized that if I really followed this rule, I would take for truth everything Ste /ven Den Be / ste wrote about the Gulf War.



Posted by: peep | Link to this comment | 07-25-18 7:37 AM
horizontal rule
13

12 is what I was going for. Rather than SDB, I thought about the Time Cube guy, but couldn't be bothered to look up his name or anything.


Posted by: Cyrus | Link to this comment | 07-25-18 7:39 AM
horizontal rule
14

13: I actually took several minutes googling to figure out SDB's name, before then realizing I probably shouldn't write it out. But I guess that's what passes for an intellectual challenge for me these days.


Posted by: peep | Link to this comment | 07-25-18 7:44 AM
horizontal rule
15

I'm not usually in the habit of saying nice things about Tim Allen, but Galaxy Quest was pretty good.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 07-25-18 8:05 AM
horizontal rule
16

On topic because I think some of peoples' views of Kirk are actually from Galaxy Quest.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 07-25-18 8:08 AM
horizontal rule
17

I suffer from a very sexy learning disability. What do I call it, Kif?

[Sigh.] Sexlexia.


Posted by: OPINIONATED ZAPP BRANNIGAN | Link to this comment | 07-25-18 8:22 AM
horizontal rule
18

My bad for reposting the very same column, I see that I even participated in the thread without then taking the trouble to read the column linked in the OP back there.


Posted by: lw | Link to this comment | 07-25-18 8:39 AM
horizontal rule
19

6: So apparently there was a 300-comment Star Trek thread in which I didn't participate. This seems impossible. I will endeavor to make up for it now.

I'm basically onboard with the thesis of the linked article,* which correctly points out that Kirk was not the cad he is portrayed/satirized to be, but I think it gets a key thing wrong: It fails to reckon with sexual conventions of '60s television. By the media standards of the time, Kirk was irresistible to women, and took advantage of that. You had to be circumspect in conveying this on camera, but viewers at the time understood it.

Undiscovered Country goofs on this theme entirely appropriately when the Iman character kisses Kirk for no obvious reason, and McCoy responds, "What is it with you?"

Plus, Kirk's non-abusive treatment of women wasn't properly understood as wokeness. It was chivalry, which (I would argue) comes from a different, more patriarchal place.

*Okay. I only read the first half. Maybe she deals with this later.


Posted by: politicalfootball | Link to this comment | 07-25-18 8:41 AM
horizontal rule
20

I don't think you can assume Kirk's chivalry wasn't at least similar to wokeness. It's not like he's defending the ladies but wanting them to stay on Earth and raise his babies. He's treating women as equal partners who don't wear pants.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 07-25-18 8:46 AM
horizontal rule
21

20: That's fair.


Posted by: politicalfootball | Link to this comment | 07-25-18 8:47 AM
horizontal rule
22

Riker, there was a guy who was all about the patriarchal place.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 07-25-18 8:49 AM
horizontal rule
23

McCoy responds, "What is it with you?"

He's an obvious Incel, looking at Kirk and thinking about millimeters of bone he doesn't have that Kirk does.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 07-25-18 8:54 AM
horizontal rule
24

One reason it bothers me when people bitch about Obama is that he's as close as we're likely to get to a President Jean-Luc Picard, which is what all right thinking people truly desire. I may have expressed this sentiment before.


Posted by: foolishmortal | Link to this comment | 07-25-18 8:59 AM
horizontal rule
25

Well he didn't shave his head did he?


Posted by: Mossy Character | Link to this comment | 07-25-18 9:00 AM
horizontal rule
26

24: Obama isn't my real dad.


Posted by: Opinionated Wesley Crusher | Link to this comment | 07-25-18 9:10 AM
horizontal rule
27

I think it was David Langford who said that the Captain Picard/Dr Crusher relationship "always had a touch of Sergeant Wilson and Mrs Pike about it" and I've never been able to watch ST:TNG the same way since.


Posted by: ajay | Link to this comment | 07-25-18 9:12 AM
horizontal rule
28

Your obscure British references are lost on normal people.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 07-25-18 9:18 AM
horizontal rule
29

It's a reference to the BBC equivalent of "Band of Brothers".


Posted by: ajay | Link to this comment | 07-25-18 9:30 AM
horizontal rule
30

IIRC, Neighbors?


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 07-25-18 9:31 AM
horizontal rule
31

29 what? NCOs in Shakespeare never have names. It's always just "a sergeant".


Posted by: Mossy Character | Link to this comment | 07-25-18 9:37 AM
horizontal rule
32

Does the BBC still drive around the country in vans detecting people who didn't pay the BBC license fee?


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 07-25-18 9:43 AM
horizontal rule
33

NCOs in Shakespeare never have names. It's always just "a sergeant".

Oh, come on, what about Pistol and Bardolph and all that lot in Henry V? You're not telling me they're officers. They are, as Pistol says, "base, common and popular".


Posted by: ajay | Link to this comment | 07-25-18 9:49 AM
horizontal rule
34

You're not telling me those are real names.


Posted by: Mossy Character | Link to this comment | 07-25-18 9:50 AM
horizontal rule
35

Shakespeare wrote a lot of great plays, but their kind of dated. The new Voltron is what the kids are into now.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 07-25-18 9:50 AM
horizontal rule
36

Desperately suppressing impulse to start writing Shakespearean Voltron pastiche based on concept of Shakespearean supermonarch formed from combination of Henry V, Henry IV Part 1, Henry V Part 2, Macbeth and King Lear.


Posted by: ajay | Link to this comment | 07-25-18 10:10 AM
horizontal rule
37

19 reminds me of this comment I wrote back then, similarly after reading only the first half of the article. It's uncanny.

35: You're joking, but I've been struggling with it. I assume we're talking about the same Netflix series, which I started watching within the past month. I have fond memories of the original Voltron (or an original Voltron, I don't know which of the half-dozen shows came first, I saw the one with lions, not the other vehicles) despite only actually seeing like eight episodes of it. Stopped the first episode before finishing it. Then a friend of mine gushed to me about how much he liked it, so I finished the first episode and watched the second and maybe third, and it's still pretty dumb. They made all the characters into idiots, added pointless intra-team conflict, and each episode is at least half padding. Maybe this is just the rose-tinted glasses of nostalgia and I'd hate the original if I watched it again, but I don't think so. It killed my desire for a live-action Voltron movie.


Posted by: Cyrus | Link to this comment | 07-25-18 10:11 AM
horizontal rule
38

I wasn't joking. 100% of the 12-year-old boys in my house watch it unironically. Thanks to iPads, I don't really know what it is about.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 07-25-18 10:15 AM
horizontal rule
39

|| Certain Women is on Netflix. No one would confuse it with Voltron. |>


Posted by: CharleyCarp | Link to this comment | 07-25-18 11:02 AM
horizontal rule
40

Although combining Laura Dern, Michelle Williams, Kristen Stewart, and Lily Gladstone gets you somewhere interesting.


Posted by: CharleyCarp | Link to this comment | 07-25-18 11:13 AM
horizontal rule
41

I just decided I should know what Voltron is so I looked it up. Would I seem cool if I went around saying I'm a fan of the original GoLion and all these Voltron series are just crude ripoffs?


Posted by: peep | Link to this comment | 07-25-18 11:20 AM
horizontal rule
42

It has surprisingly little to do with electron-volts.


Posted by: dalriata | Link to this comment | 07-25-18 11:21 AM
horizontal rule
43

I only realized this second that Voltron and Ultron weren't the same word.


Posted by: Mossy Character | Link to this comment | 07-25-18 11:22 AM
horizontal rule
44

|| I always considered Judge Messitte a good draw. I still think so. |>


Posted by: CharleyCarp | Link to this comment | 07-25-18 12:52 PM
horizontal rule
45

44: The emoluments case is going somewhere? Interesting.


Posted by: Cyrus | Link to this comment | 07-25-18 1:14 PM
horizontal rule
46

OT: So did the Russians just accidentally drop the poison or did they try to cover their tracks by making another incident or what?


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 07-25-18 1:30 PM
horizontal rule
47

44-45: I've got zero knowledge here, but is there any reason to believe that plaintiffs can make a case that they have standing? (Does this ruling speak to that issue?)


Posted by: politicalfootball | Link to this comment | 07-25-18 2:09 PM
horizontal rule
48

47:


Posted by: peep | Link to this comment | 07-25-18 2:13 PM
horizontal rule
49

48: This suit, filed by the attorneys general, cleared an initial hurdle in March. Back then, Messitte settled one legal question, ruling the plaintiffs had legal standing to sue the president in the first place.


Posted by: peep | Link to this comment | 07-25-18 2:14 PM
horizontal rule
50

Thank you! I suppose I could actually read the links ...


Posted by: politicalfootball | Link to this comment | 07-25-18 2:17 PM
horizontal rule
51

I posted a link to today's 52 page decision at the other place. It's well done. Denial of a motion to dismiss is not an appealable order, usually, but maybe the President will seek mandamus. Otherwise, there'll be discovery on how much money Trump makes when Kuwait, for example, throws a party at the hotel in DC, and there's a whole lot of stuff he doesn't want to talk about involved in that.

There was that mini-thread not long ago about whether folks wish Romney had won. I wonder if there are yet many rightwingers who regret Paula Jones winning her Supreme Court case.


Posted by: CharleyCarp | Link to this comment | 07-25-18 2:40 PM
horizontal rule
52

Otherwise, there'll be discovery on how much money Trump makes when Kuwait, for example, throws a party at the hotel in DC, and there's a whole lot of stuff he doesn't want to talk about involved in that.

It really is a sign of how far standards have fallen that it takes a years of litigation to get that. A decent Congress would have demanded it.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 07-25-18 2:44 PM
horizontal rule
53

Not one goddamned Khan* joke, you filthy reprobates?

Nor even one "But take, for example, Khan Noonien Singh, who is depicted as the reverse of Kirk's medal in both his canonical [pun averted] appearances: first, in his treatment of women, etc., etc."?

Come on, people nerds.

* KHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAN!!!


Posted by: Flippanter | Link to this comment | 07-25-18 3:26 PM
horizontal rule
54

Ahem.


Posted by: Opinionated 5th Comment | Link to this comment | 07-25-18 3:30 PM
horizontal rule
55

54: Granted in part, but distinguished as a Khan Academy joke.


Posted by: Flippanter | Link to this comment | 07-25-18 3:31 PM
horizontal rule
56

Fucking lawyers.


Posted by: Opinionated 5th Comment | Link to this comment | 07-25-18 3:37 PM
horizontal rule
57

Vaguely OT, I used to joke that I wanted to study Space Law, but nobody else seemed to think this idea was as funny as I did. (Just to jokesplain: I'm not picturing boring treaties and stuff; I'm picturing lawyers lawyering but in space suits. In a floaty space courtroom.)


Posted by: Stanley | Link to this comment | 07-25-18 6:32 PM
horizontal rule
58

Remember that it only counts as SPACE COURT if the SPACE FLAG has gold trim.


Posted by: dalriata | Link to this comment | 07-25-18 7:10 PM
horizontal rule
59

You could have a literal rocket docket.


Posted by: Stanley | Link to this comment | 07-25-18 7:21 PM
horizontal rule
60

|| Local news, but it's starting to get national attention: an archivist and a bookstore owner stole $8 million of rare books from our library. |>


Posted by: dalriata | Link to this comment | 07-26-18 12:50 PM
horizontal rule
61

60: Moby linked to an article about a few days ago and we've already discussed it.

On the topic of local shame, have we discussed this yet? I was totally shocked that the arrest of Stormy Daniels turned out not to be part of a long-term Columbus Police investigation of human trafficking. The funniest part is that that Dispatch was scooped by the Fayette Advocate.

http://thefayetteadvocate.com/2018/07/25/whistleblower-provides-emails-that-show-stormy-daniels-arrest-was-pre-planned/


Posted by: peep | Link to this comment | 07-26-18 1:19 PM
horizontal rule
62

60 has more details. Thanks.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 07-26-18 2:04 PM
horizontal rule
63

61.last: I did see that one. It's one of about 800 pieces of news in the past week that would have blown up huge except Trump keeps lowering the bar.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 07-26-18 2:11 PM
horizontal rule
64

The book dealer in question sold some of those stolen items to a major rare book dealer in London who I've done business with. IMPO there's no way he didn't know.


Posted by: Barry Freed | Link to this comment | 07-26-18 8:59 PM
horizontal rule
65

I have a crackpot theory that the reason why Kirk got rewritten by popular culture was because in the original show he was treated as a sex object in a way that nowadays is reserved for women. He was always getting his shirt ripped, etc.


Posted by: Walt Someguy | Link to this comment | 07-27-18 12:58 PM
horizontal rule
66

Counterpoint.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 07-27-18 1:16 PM
horizontal rule
67

DO YOU EVEN WATCH MOVIES?


Posted by: OPINIONATED CHRIS HEMSWORTH | Link to this comment | 07-27-18 1:59 PM
horizontal rule
68

Okay but: "Caliban Book Store" as the name for a shop that cynically steals treasures of modern colonial culture from its trusting masters/benefactors? Credit where due.


Posted by: lurid keyaki | Link to this comment | 07-27-18 2:06 PM
horizontal rule
69

67: Not really. I saw about two minutes of where you (or a different Chris) fought to "The Immigrant Song" before leaving to play Civ.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 07-27-18 2:09 PM
horizontal rule
70

68: The reference was too literate for me.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 07-27-18 2:11 PM
horizontal rule
71

DO YOU EVEN WATCH MOVIES? Isabelle Pasco seems pleasant enough to gaze at. But yes, Caliban was canonically the one with the grudge, not the books.


Posted by: lurid keyaki | Link to this comment | 07-27-18 2:20 PM
horizontal rule
72

65: My theory: Since women were understood to have no agency, their interest in seducing Kirk was necessarily his achievement, and not their choice. Hence, he is a womanizer.


Posted by: politicalfootball | Link to this comment | 07-27-18 2:47 PM
horizontal rule
73

Kirk was such a womanizer that his VD was sufficient to reduce the population of an alien race.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 07-27-18 2:50 PM
horizontal rule