I'll explain. :) Ogged still thinks he's straight, but, a la Mr Garrison, the contrary evidence piles up.
Now that I think about, although I'm sure it's merely coincidence, Mr Garrison was also preoccupied with men's olympic swimming.
I'll never forget assalicious. Especially now.
Many men prefer to date women with breasts.
I didn't study the damn picture before I clicked on it, wiseass.
Burns: What do you think, Smithers?
Smithers: I think women and seamen don't mix.
Many men prefer to date women with breasts.
Yes, and that photo was so obviously of a male body. So, if ogged is attracted to women with male bodies ...
Does ogged have a little puppet?
hmmm....I'll guess we'll have to ask w-lfs-n and Kotsko if they're sure the guy they met was really Unf.
Does ogged have a little puppet?hmmm....I'll guess we'll have to ask w-lfs-n and Kotsko if they're sure the guy they met was really Unf.
Listen, it was fun and all, but we didn't really get down to "little puppets", IYKWIM.
My evidence that it was the real Unf: He said he would post every two weeks, and he has basically done that.
You know, this does bring up an issue that I've really been wondering about lately: why are knitting blogs so dominated by women? Some kind of gatekeeper problem? Institutional barriers? The fact that generally men's fingers are pudgier and less nimble than women's?
Anti-Scots prejudice? After all, the Highlands are covered with manly kilted shepherds knitting themselves argyle socks -- the male knitters are out there, they just aren't blogging.
And that picture was so unambiguously male. I'm starting to realize why so many men are so excited by long hair -- it's the only way they can figure out who the girls are.
Why does a moving moment demonstrating ogged's growing comfort with his sexuality have to be ruined by snark?
Thank you scmTim, I figured you'd be the sensitive one. I wonder if baa will make a reservation for us at Greens?
It will be under the name Butch Stonewall.
It's a knitting thread-- maybe our old friend Phil McCrakin?
'I didn't study the damn picture before I clicked on it, wiseass.'
'When I saw the picture over at Fussy, I thought, "Hey, that looks like the kind of woman I'd date."'
scandal
My initial reaction was "female" as well, and I think the picture is ambiguous.
Loose sweaters hide the "cash and prizes."
God, that "Mrs." makes me feel like such a bad boy for cursing. We love your knitting, Mrs. Kennedy! We totally don't mind you fucking with our self-perception, Mrs. Kennedy!
But the woman in the other pictures at that site looks like she could be O's type. That is, she looks like she could be tall, and she has a sort of wry expression. Actually, O, doesn't she look vaguely like your ex?
She looks a bit like ex, especially now that ex also has very short hair.
Is there but one ex? From whatever site reading I can claim, I thought that there were a couple.
There's ex, and there's ex-before-last. There's also first-ex, but we don't talk about her. Anyway, Bob only knows ex, so it was clear (to me) who he meant.
Questions for further clarification:
1. Is "formerly affianced" a prerequisite for being an ex?
2. Wouldn't ex, ex', and ex'' be a more concise rendition of the same thing?
3. As #1 might relate to the ongoing drought: you do know that you don't have to be engaged to them to sleep with them, right?
ex-sub-n, maybe. (<sub> is getting stripped out of the comments!) Say that ex() is a function of one argument, which maps integers representing women (so that there's an ordering) to the amount of time ogged has been with them before the relationship ends. Say further that the ordering is chronological, so that 1 represents the first woman ogged went out with. Then ex' would be an idea that, as is rapidly becoming clear, isn't all that funny and is probably best abandoned.