Re: Townes

1

Fantastic! Except that it's not coming to DC. Well, fuck, I was meaning to get up to NYC this month, but not to see a movie.


Posted by: Armsmasher | Link to this comment | 12- 2-05 11:55 AM
horizontal rule
2

What are you coming up for, Smasher? I could see the Gugg's Russia show being up your alley.


Posted by: Becks | Link to this comment | 12- 2-05 11:58 AM
horizontal rule
3

Sorry -- I meant "Russia!"


Posted by: Becks | Link to this comment | 12- 2-05 11:59 AM
horizontal rule
4

(Which is actually getting good reviews despite the fact that anything requiring an exclamation point in the name should be treated as suspect.)


Posted by: Becks | Link to this comment | 12- 2-05 12:00 PM
horizontal rule
5

Titties!


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 12- 2-05 12:01 PM
horizontal rule
6

That's exactly what I want to see. I've been fortunate enough to see the big works in the Gugg show at the Hermitage, but I have to see them again.

I'd say my favorite Townes is High, Low, and In-Between; it has more of my favorite Townes songs. But Abnormal is awesome and is a more coherent album.


Posted by: Armsmasher | Link to this comment | 12- 2-05 12:03 PM
horizontal rule
7

6 to 5.


Posted by: Armsmasher | Link to this comment | 12- 2-05 12:04 PM
horizontal rule
8

Sure it was.


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 12- 2-05 12:05 PM
horizontal rule
9

The Russia! show is really excellent, not being an art critic or having seen it that recently I'm somewhat at a loss to describe it using more better words.


Posted by: washerdreyer | Link to this comment | 12- 2-05 12:06 PM
horizontal rule
10

Wait, I thought you meant 6 to 4. Damn.

Ok, I'm leaving.


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 12- 2-05 12:07 PM
horizontal rule
11

Oh, and a lot of the work is from the Tretyakov gallery, not the Hermitage, since the Hermitage in large part featured collections of art work by non-Russian artists.


Posted by: washerdreyer | Link to this comment | 12- 2-05 12:08 PM
horizontal rule
12

Yeah, the Russia[!] show is on my list and I'd better suck it up and go because it's closing soon. I'm just annoyed with the Guggenheim so I haven't been able to bring myself to do it yet. It seems like they've done a really bad job installing their exhibits lately and the museum ends up feeling much more crowded than it really is. I left the Aztec exhibit wanting to smack people.


Posted by: Becks | Link to this comment | 12- 2-05 12:09 PM
horizontal rule
13

Is that Russia! show going to be anywhere else, or just New York. (Am I going to have get into Russia before they go fully authoritarian again?)


Posted by: eb | Link to this comment | 12- 2-05 12:12 PM
horizontal rule
14

11, no doubt. The signature pieces (Repin, Vrubel, Malevich) are from the Hermitage; I'm guessing that everything else is from either State or Tretyakov.

Did you know that Putin is more or less paying for the whole thing?


Posted by: Armsmasher | Link to this comment | 12- 2-05 12:14 PM
horizontal rule
15

Really, if I can channel one message to the people who run art galleries and museums, it would be to plead with them to think about how things will flow and whether people will be able to read the descriptions and enjoy the art when their space is at capacity, not just when attendance is sparse. The Gugg has a tendency to set things up where the crowd looking at item A is standing right in the path of the person looking at item B. The Met's costume gallery, which always puts their plaques on the floor, is the worst offender.

Then again, I'm the same person who complained about Twombly's carpet, so you can feel free to disregard this as me talking out of my ass.


Posted by: Becks | Link to this comment | 12- 2-05 12:20 PM
horizontal rule
16

I missed the last 50 years of the Russia!!!1! exhibit becuase the Goog has the temerity to close so early on Sundays... so get there early. but so worth it, especially if -like me- you known "nichivo" about Russia.


Posted by: mike d | Link to this comment | 12- 2-05 12:29 PM
horizontal rule
17

Shouldn't someone have used the word "transgressive" by now?


Posted by: SomeCallMeTim | Link to this comment | 12- 2-05 12:31 PM
horizontal rule
18

I second the recommendation for listening to High, Low, and In-Between / Late Great as well as his live albums.

His early recordings are fun. He was very musical and creative and that doesn't always come through in the later recordings.

The emotion and directness of the live albums are amazing but I don't always know what to make of them. On The Highway Kind, for example, the first two songs are two of my all time favorites but the version of Darcy Farrow always bothers me. The emotion on the latter seems so out of proportion to the song.


Posted by: NickS | Link to this comment | 12- 2-05 12:33 PM
horizontal rule
19

Did you know that Putin is more or less paying for the whole thing?

Do you mean him personally, or the Russian government?


Posted by: Matt F | Link to this comment | 12- 2-05 12:35 PM
horizontal rule
20

Pooty-poot himself.


Posted by: Armsmasher | Link to this comment | 12- 2-05 12:39 PM
horizontal rule
21

But what's the difference?


Posted by: Armsmasher | Link to this comment | 12- 2-05 12:42 PM
horizontal rule
22

L'etat, c'est lui.


Posted by: eb | Link to this comment | 12- 2-05 12:45 PM
horizontal rule
23

anything requiring an exclamation point in the name should be treated as suspect

Nonsense.


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 12- 2-05 12:49 PM
horizontal rule
24

Huh, impressive.

Has he finished taking over the oil industry, and now wants to focus his attention on the lucrative art gallery industry?


Posted by: Matt F | Link to this comment | 12- 2-05 12:51 PM
horizontal rule
25

Isn't the big thing right now the NGOs?


Posted by: eb | Link to this comment | 12- 2-05 12:53 PM
horizontal rule
26

From oil to oil paintings?


Posted by: Armsmasher | Link to this comment | 12- 2-05 12:55 PM
horizontal rule
27

And will the Putinheim have a reasonable (socialized) student entry fee?


Posted by: Jackmormon | Link to this comment | 12- 2-05 12:55 PM
horizontal rule
28

If 27 is a question about the actual Guggenheim in New York as opposed to a hypothetical art museum under the control of the former head of the FSB (not so hypothetical I guess, see discussion of Russian state run art museums above), it's an unreasonable $15 for students.


Posted by: washerdreyer | Link to this comment | 12- 2-05 1:30 PM
horizontal rule
29

Late to the party here, but Van Zandt is awesome.


Posted by: bill | Link to this comment | 12- 2-05 3:41 PM
horizontal rule
30

Ronnie, Stevie, and Townes Van Zandt walk into a bar.

"*?" asks the bartender.

"*", says Ronnie.

"*", says Stevie.

"*!", says Townes.

"A ham sandwich", says the rabbi.

Thank you.


Posted by: John Emerson | Link to this comment | 12- 2-05 4:21 PM
horizontal rule
31

Ronnie Van Zandt's grave was desecrated in the year 2000. "How is it possible to desecrate anything related to Lynyrd Skynrd?" you may ask. But amphetamine knows know law. Rogue Doobie or Allmon brothers or cousins are suspected.


Posted by: John Emerson | Link to this comment | 12- 2-05 4:27 PM
horizontal rule
32

"nos know law".


Posted by: John Emerson | Link to this comment | 12- 2-05 4:28 PM
horizontal rule
33

It seems like they've done a really bad job installing their exhibits lately

To be fair, it's very hard to install anything in that space (the Ellsworth Kelly retrospective of some years ago being a major exception, but even that was for more overall effect than for individual works.) On the other hand, no, they don't seem to try too hard.

If you miss Russia! at the Gugg, there's still a couple of great reasons to be on Fifth Ave this season: Fra Angelico! at the Met and Memling! at the Frick.

The Fra Angelico catalog came into the office this week. I was checking it out, thinking how terrific it looked, and then thought, Damn, they are gonna sell so much merchandising off this show during Christmas season. So jealous.


Posted by: JL | Link to this comment | 12- 2-05 6:19 PM
horizontal rule
34

anything requiring an exclamation point in the name should be treated as suspect

I used to be suspicious of exclamation points too. That was before I found out about Fafblog!.


Posted by: Jeremy Osner | Link to this comment | 12- 2-05 6:32 PM
horizontal rule
35

Seven Year Bitch


Posted by: ben w-lfs-n | Link to this comment | 12- 2-05 8:06 PM
horizontal rule
36

1000!


Posted by: eb | Link to this comment | 12- 2-05 8:06 PM
horizontal rule
37

The Lady & Eve


Posted by: ben w-lfs-n | Link to this comment | 12- 2-05 8:06 PM
horizontal rule
38

She Done Him Right


Posted by: ben w-lfs-n | Link to this comment | 12- 2-05 8:07 PM
horizontal rule
39

Excellent. Ok, ok, it's open again.


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 12- 2-05 8:07 PM
horizontal rule
40

Ogged is a vengeful Ogged. But I'm happy to have gotten the last comment on that thread.


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 12- 2-05 8:07 PM
horizontal rule
41

I think we should all be grateful for Ogged's brilliance. If someone had actually got to comment 1000 on the other thread, jealousy would have torn the Mineshaft apart. (I, for instance, would have lorded it over the rest of you like nobody's business.)


Posted by: Matt Weiner | Link to this comment | 12- 2-05 8:08 PM
horizontal rule
42

And he pwns me again.


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 12- 2-05 8:08 PM
horizontal rule
43

37 is 1000. Congratulations, Ben.


Posted by: Standpipe Bridgeplate | Link to this comment | 12- 2-05 8:08 PM
horizontal rule
44

eb wins.


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 12- 2-05 8:10 PM
horizontal rule
45

That accords with my calculations, SB. Many thanks.


Posted by: ben w-lfs-n | Link to this comment | 12- 2-05 8:10 PM
horizontal rule
46

Oops, eb wins.


Posted by: Standpipe Bridgeplate | Link to this comment | 12- 2-05 8:12 PM
horizontal rule
47

Too bad that thread re-opened.


Posted by: eb | Link to this comment | 12- 2-05 8:13 PM
horizontal rule
48

For w-lfs-n, that is.


Posted by: eb | Link to this comment | 12- 2-05 8:15 PM
horizontal rule
49

48 just proves my point in 41.


Posted by: Matt Weiner | Link to this comment | 12- 2-05 8:26 PM
horizontal rule
50

This is like showing up at a party around midnight, sober.

Fun was obviously had by all.


Posted by: John Emerson | Link to this comment | 12- 2-05 8:42 PM
horizontal rule