Re: The Second Half Of The Decade

1

happy new year ogged. it's been an up and down year, but -unf+ogged has been a good place to always get teh awesome.


Posted by: tweedledopey | Link to this comment | 12-31-05 10:12 PM
horizontal rule
2

Happy New Year!


Posted by: Frederick | Link to this comment | 12-31-05 11:03 PM
horizontal rule
3

Happy New Year's! Just three more years before stupid 200X glasses are history. Woo!


Posted by: Becks | Link to this comment | 12-31-05 11:03 PM
horizontal rule
4

yeah becks, I can't wait.


Posted by: tweedledopey | Link to this comment | 12-31-05 11:09 PM
horizontal rule
5

Happy New Year! to all you earlier time zoned people.


Posted by: eb | Link to this comment | 12-31-05 11:10 PM
horizontal rule
6

happy new year! i just spent the evening with a bunch of libertarians, and if i can come out of that having had a good time, 2006 looks okay.


Posted by: catherine | Link to this comment | 12-31-05 11:36 PM
horizontal rule
7

Though lame, my new year's eve did involve some really good armagnac, so happy new year to all y'all.


Posted by: ben w-lfs-n | Link to this comment | 12-31-05 11:42 PM
horizontal rule
8

Happy New Year, everyone.


Posted by: teofilo | Link to this comment | 01- 1-06 12:07 AM
horizontal rule
9

It's been quite a year in our corner of blogdom, with all the real-life meetings, big fights, sappy reconciliations, threatened outings and lawsuits, and, of course,

Translation: par for electronicaland. Like blogs were going to be any fucking different.

another demonstration of Unfogged's power to silence yet another blogger, simply by adding a name to the sidebar.

Yet, somehow, you keep running off at the mouth (although Farber clearly has you beat hands down in a wind sprint).

Should we even wish for the new year to be as eventful?

Dull is good; happy is frequently dull.

And thanks again to everyone who reads and, especially, comments here--it would be a much better site if you'd all shut up, but we'd probably have less traffic.

Does anyone actually read the posts, as opposed to the comments?

that basic decency still has a chance. Tonight, at least, we can be happy for what hope we've got.

Fucking optimists. That's how we got into this fucking hole in the first fucking place.

For a pro forma post I rate it a B-. Happy New Year!

ash

['I elected to kick.']


Posted by: ash | Link to this comment | 01- 1-06 1:37 AM
horizontal rule
10

Happy new year, all. Amusing new year's anecdote: my parents were supposed to go to the Kennedy Center tonight, but since my mom apparently can't read a calendar, she bought tickets for Dec. 30, thinking that was new year's eve. They discovered this shortly before they were to leave for the performance. So they just went out to dinner and saw a movie instead.


Posted by: Matt F | Link to this comment | 01- 1-06 1:38 AM
horizontal rule
11

Happy New Year!


Posted by: bob mcmanus | Link to this comment | 01- 1-06 2:17 AM
horizontal rule
12

happy new year! from the one person in the world who went to bed early. I never saw 9 a.m. Jan 1 before. (7 am., yes, but from the other side.)


Posted by: mcmc | Link to this comment | 01- 1-06 6:48 AM
horizontal rule
13

happy new years. i love sociable cities where, after about 500000 occupied cabs pass you by at 4:30am, you can just hail a citoyen passing in his car and he will let your friends and you pile in, after the offer of a little gas money. hope you are all awake and enjoying the new year's morning...


Posted by: mmf! | Link to this comment | 01- 1-06 8:38 AM
horizontal rule
14

p.s. There is an important and intelligent article by Appiah in the NY Times magazine, popularizing (I hope) ideas that have been circulating around my discipline and related disciplines for some time but not yet really gotten out. If you are interested in politics, and the cultural inflections thereof, you will enjoy it.

have a look

or: http://www.nytimes.com/2006/01/01/magazine/01cosmopolitan.html


Posted by: mmf! | Link to this comment | 01- 1-06 9:17 AM
horizontal rule
15

Happy new year, all. My new year involved a party with actual caviar (which I didn't try), cheap cheese on crackers, even cheaper champagne, and a home karoake machine which was very bad news for me and two of my friends who barely knew anybody, and instead of using our drunkness to talk to cute philosophy students, used it to do a fine rendition of, I think, Desperado.

Oops.


Posted by: silvana | Link to this comment | 01- 1-06 10:40 AM
horizontal rule
16

Happy New Year! Who was the victim of death by blogroll?

Also, the second half of the decade started on Jan. 1, 2005.


Posted by: Matt Weiner | Link to this comment | 01- 1-06 10:41 AM
horizontal rule
17

karaoke.


Posted by: silvana | Link to this comment | 01- 1-06 10:41 AM
horizontal rule
18

Not if the decade started on Jan. 1, 2001. Which it did.


Posted by: silvana | Link to this comment | 01- 1-06 10:44 AM
horizontal rule
19

That is a less plausible version of the theory that the millenium started on that day, a theory that I have decisively refuted.


Posted by: Matt Weiner | Link to this comment | 01- 1-06 10:49 AM
horizontal rule
20

instead of using our drunkness to talk to cute philosophy students

Wise decision. Since you claim not to be near me at the moment, you'd just have been wasting your time talking to less than optimally cute students anyway.


Posted by: ben w-lfs-n | Link to this comment | 01- 1-06 11:04 AM
horizontal rule
21

Your can doesn't scare me, Weiner.


Posted by: silvana | Link to this comment | 01- 1-06 11:05 AM
horizontal rule
22

Sure, w-lfs-n, but even the wiles of a moderately cute philosophy student would have been better at that point than inexplicably spending at least 5 minutes listening to a very not-cute guy perform U Can't Touch This. Badly.


Posted by: silvana | Link to this comment | 01- 1-06 11:09 AM
horizontal rule
23

I approve of any definition of decade which consigns 1990 to the 80s, 1980 to the 70s, etc. Makes perfect sense!


Posted by: eb | Link to this comment | 01- 1-06 11:26 AM
horizontal rule
24

Merry New Year! Beef jerky?


Posted by: SomeCallMeTim | Link to this comment | 01- 1-06 11:41 AM
horizontal rule
25

Who was the victim of death by blogroll?

He didn't say blogroll, he said sidebar. So.


Posted by: silvana | Link to this comment | 01- 1-06 12:20 PM
horizontal rule
26

But is there anything in the sidebar that contains names other than the blogroll? Ah, the contributor's list. That makes sense.


Posted by: Matt Weiner | Link to this comment | 01- 1-06 12:32 PM
horizontal rule
27

s/b "contributors'" or "contributors," but which I don't know.


Posted by: Matt Weiner | Link to this comment | 01- 1-06 12:33 PM
horizontal rule
28

Alameida, who found the burden of being the token female on three different sites too onerous.


Posted by: John Emerson | Link to this comment | 01- 1-06 1:41 PM
horizontal rule
29

Which other two do you have in mind, John? The one where she's married to the other contributor, or the one she shares with Ezster and Maria, among others?


Posted by: FL | Link to this comment | 01- 1-06 2:07 PM
horizontal rule
30

De re reports of Alameida's disappearance are much exaggerated; she still posts at some of those other sites, and adding her to the contributors list could hardly have reduced her posting here, since before then she didn't post here at all. (I am enforcing a post/comment distinction.) The NY Times Weddings blog shows at least a steep a dropoff after being added to the sidebar.


Posted by: Matt Weiner | Link to this comment | 01- 1-06 2:20 PM
horizontal rule
31

alameida's mia-dom notwithstanding, this blog is among the most nearly gender-balanced I've seen (among commenters, assuming people are what they purport to be). Which is something good. Happy new year, all.


Posted by: slolernr | Link to this comment | 01- 1-06 5:05 PM
horizontal rule
32

Ezster was brought in as a relief pitcher after Almeida's arm gave out. Maria is not prolific either.

On her married site, she's the only female posting. Think of that -- the most productive man in the blog biz, a man whose very name has become an adjective meaning "copious" -- and one poor woman for balance.


Posted by: John Emerson | Link to this comment | 01- 1-06 5:09 PM
horizontal rule
33

Maria is not prolific either.

Comments on the state of that union seem inappropriate, Emerson.


Posted by: SomeCallMeTim | Link to this comment | 01- 1-06 5:16 PM
horizontal rule
34

As a Catholic she should have at least 6 kids by now.


Posted by: John Emerson | Link to this comment | 01- 1-06 5:18 PM
horizontal rule
35

One hates to spoil a good joke (actually one is chortling diabolically as one types), but she's Henry's sister, and I think not unioned.


Posted by: Matt Weiner | Link to this comment | 01- 2-06 6:23 AM
horizontal rule
36

Also, Emerson's understanding of the history of That Blog is inaccurate; the de-Googled Ezster McVie was a longtime member before Buckingham and Nicks were brought in as guests and then permanent members.

I wonder if the Stevie Nicks comparison will be enough to get Alameida to come out of limbo to kick my ass, or if it might even be taken as a compliment.

While I'm blathering off-topic, this might be a good time to point and laugh at Chopper, if he's reading.


Posted by: Matt Weiner | Link to this comment | 01- 2-06 6:33 AM
horizontal rule
37

Why is Henry having sex with his sister? It's probably a good thing that they don't have kids.

Almeida does not seem to be serious enough about helping liberal academics dodge charges of sexism.

Stevie Nicks is my dirty little musical secret, BTW. I really have always hated Topanga-Canyon-type music, but Stevie was so cute in her day, and her lyrics were so spacy, and I just like her voice.


Posted by: John Emerson | Link to this comment | 01- 2-06 7:28 AM
horizontal rule
38

PB Almeida has never to my knowledge been a front-page (or otherwise) poster on Unfogged.


Posted by: Jeremy Osner | Link to this comment | 01- 2-06 7:39 AM
horizontal rule
39

Peanut Butter?


Posted by: ben w-lfs-n | Link to this comment | 01- 2-06 9:20 AM
horizontal rule
40

Your guess might well be better than mine.


Posted by: Jeremy Osner | Link to this comment | 01- 2-06 1:56 PM
horizontal rule
41

While I'm blathering off-topic, this might be a good time to point and laugh at Chopper, if he's reading.

How many more of these will I have to read as I slowly catch up with all that's been up?


Posted by: Chopper | Link to this comment | 01- 3-06 4:09 PM
horizontal rule