I was considering posting the second link the other day. How often, really, do you find yourself wanting the clothes two people in a porn movie are wearing?
Also, since there's no Flash 8 plugin for Linux yet, all I could do was download and watch the movies and not order clothes even if I wanted to!
How often, really, do you find yourself wanting the clothes two people in a porn movie are wearing?
It happens. (Also NSFW)
You have no idea how relieved I am that that link is unrelated to the Insane Clown Posse, apo.
It was considerate of them to remember the gays.
You know what I feel kind of guilty about after watching some of that? I'm a little grossed out by close up shots of cunnilingus or people putting their fingers in womens' vaginas. I'm fine with my own, but other people's are so squishy seeming. I feel bad that I think that, though.
I've just made my peace with my own squishiness.
Is that what they're calling it these days?
Could someone tell me what the second link is about so that I don't have to click it from work?
Here's the MeFi thread where they describe the action. I guess that's safer for work.
Don't feel guilty for thinking that, Tia. I don't know if I would call it squishiness but it seems like they had more, I don't know, degrees of freedom than I do or something. Perhaps I should upgrade to a newer model.
11: How do you read it? Seems to me the properly referenced antecedent in #7 is "shots."
Labs, do you check your Unfogged email? I emailed you something you might find funny.
It wasn't their particular vaginas that are gross; I just think I'm weirded out by other womens' vaginas. Or actually, just people interacting with them, because I'm not weirded out by the site of my friends' vaginas.
Is that sculpture a joke? It was never made or it was never made as a pro-life gesture? Daniel Edwards's other work has a similar sense of humor, says Google.
I personally do not think that any genitalia are attractive to look at. They seem more functional than aesthetic -- at least, not visually aesthetic.
"Genitalia: maybe not pretty, but they get the job done". I see a PR campaign in the making.
I personally do not think that any genitalia are attractive to look at.
You've never seen mine, Emerson.
Goddamnit, Tia's description of vulvas as "squishy" has made me feel the need to download these stupid videos and see what she's talking about, like if the women in the clips are doing anything that's especially remarkable. And the clips take for-fucking-ever to download.
anything that's especially remarkable
No.
I gave up on the download, although I had chosen mw, and Tia apparently ww. Would mm be faster, I wonder?
Yours are?
Probably TMI, but I've had dreams in which I found myself to be equipped with two penises. It was quite unusual to find myself having to decide which one to use.
The one time I ever managed to dream lucidly, my sleeping self said, "Self, now that you're dreaming lucidly, what do you want to dream about? I know, underwater sex with a many-tentacled creature." But then in the process of trying to construct an image of the many-tentacled creature, I got too close to consciousness and woke up.
As of comment #27, Tia is officially disqualified from mocking Steven den Beste.
No way! I only lose the right to mock SdB if I simultaneously try to disavow the desire to have sex with a many-tentacled creature.
in the process of trying to construct an image of the many-tentacled creature, I got too close to consciousness
And there MAE was in the next dream over, and could have saved you the trouble.
I love explaining other people's jokes, in the form of pretending to make the same joke myself. It gives me a special feeling.
I've had the "naked in public" dreams so often that they no longer produce any anxiety, and I merely converse with whoever is about, and hold up a napkin if I'm feeling polite.
It was through such dreams that I became a nudist in my waking life.
Wasn't there a time when the spambot was getting smarter?
And now my previous comment looks totally random.