Re: The Wire, Reconsidered

1

I gave Season 1 of Prison Break a shot this weekend since a bunch of my friends have been raving about it. Watched 3 episodes and I'm just not feeling it at all. I think I'm done with it.


Posted by: Becks | Link to this comment | 08-27-06 10:01 PM
horizontal rule
2

Your friend's a jackass. The acting is very good, and the directing is flat intentionally.


Posted by: SomeCallMeTim | Link to this comment | 08-27-06 10:03 PM
horizontal rule
3

but I was recently trying to convert a friend who has a good eye for such things, and she said that the acting and directing is actually pretty bad. While remaining heroically steadfast in my opinion of the show, I tried looking at it with fresh eyes, and...damn, the acting (I'm not much qualified to judge the directing) is pretty bad, pretty often.

Cripes, I hope you were trying to seduce this woman, because if you didn't notice the bad acting or bad directing until someone pointed it out to you, maybe, just maybe, it wasn't bad acting or bad directing. Or is there some other, richer, experience of the show that you were supposed to have, one that took you well beyond BEST SHOW EVAR? Pathetic.

(No, I have no idea why am furious about this.)


Posted by: SomeCallMeTim | Link to this comment | 08-27-06 10:09 PM
horizontal rule
4

Adam's anger is contagious.


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 08-27-06 10:10 PM
horizontal rule
5

This, SCMT.


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 08-27-06 10:12 PM
horizontal rule
6

That's probably the dirtiest thing slol's ever written.


Posted by: standpipe b | Link to this comment | 08-27-06 10:14 PM
horizontal rule
7

if you didn't notice the bad acting...maybe...it wasn't bad acting

No, when I'm favorably disposed to a movie or TV show, I tend to overlook, as in literally not notice, its flaws. I only recently watched a few of the episodes with other people, which made me think about how they were likely to see them, which is why there was that previous post of Wire nitpicks, and now this one.


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 08-27-06 10:15 PM
horizontal rule
8

Ogged, what could it possibly mean for the acting to bad, but you didn't notice it the first time around? All I can think is that you could have enjoyed it more, you couldn't put your finger on what was wrong, and your friend did it for you. Except it's hard to believe you could have enjoyed it more. Yeah, Sonja sucks, but that's about it.


Posted by: SomeCallMeTim | Link to this comment | 08-27-06 10:17 PM
horizontal rule
9

See? Keillor makes people turn on one another. I'm telling you, the man is evil.


Posted by: bitchphd | Link to this comment | 08-27-06 10:17 PM
horizontal rule
10

This isn't complicated: there was a lot I liked about the show: the feel, the writing, the setting, the plot, and I didn't pay attention to the clunkiness of the acting. The quality of the acting isn't high on my list of things to assess about a show.


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 08-27-06 10:20 PM
horizontal rule
11

Cross-posted. This is one of those areas where I have a hard time distinguishing between legitimate, useful criticism and fraud.


Posted by: SomeCallMeTim | Link to this comment | 08-27-06 10:23 PM
horizontal rule
12

Seriously dude, the acting is often bad. Go watch it again. I still love the show, quit acting betrayed.


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 08-27-06 10:24 PM
horizontal rule
13

I already admitted that Sonja sucked. My recollection is that D'Angelo wasn't great, and Omar comes off a bit over the top. But other than that, really pretty good. Bunk, as you mention is excellent. So's Daniels. Love the DA, who can look so secretly injured. The Captain who created Hamsterdam--great performance. Stringer's a bit off, occassionally, but it's a really tough character to sell. Avon is played beautifully, especially at the end--just a marvelous, growing sense of who he is.


Posted by: SomeCallMeTim | Link to this comment | 08-27-06 10:31 PM
horizontal rule
14

Daniels is a great presence, but the guy only has about three expressions. The scenes with his wife could be much more affecting. And you have to think about all the non-pro actors they use. X minutes out of every show just aren't sharply acted.


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 08-27-06 10:36 PM
horizontal rule
15

I gave Season 1 of Prison Break a shot this weekend since a bunch of my friends have been raving about it. Watched 3 episodes and I'm just not feeling it at all. I think I'm done with it.

Go with that instinct. Prison Break blows.


Posted by: gswift | Link to this comment | 08-27-06 10:42 PM
horizontal rule
16

Daniels is a great presence, but the guy only has about three expressions.

I believe this is known as "staying in character."


Posted by: eb | Link to this comment | 08-27-06 10:45 PM
horizontal rule
17

I don't think I am a fan of o-acting. If Meryl Streep was a better actor, I wouldn't be thinking what a good actor she is all the time.

My least favorite part of the wire is the sex scenes. It just seems weird watching the characters have sex.


Posted by: joe o | Link to this comment | 08-27-06 10:51 PM
horizontal rule
18

I'm a huge Wire fan, but there are little things in it that I feel aren't perfect. Namely, when it verges on the cartoonish -- I'm thinking about Omar/Brother Mazzone, or Omar playing to the jury in court, or McNulty doing his thing half the time. But that's also what makes the series great. A lot of the Wire hype is based on it being a very "serious" show and it is but it's not just "The Corner," it has a lot of great fantasy characters.


Posted by: Barbar | Link to this comment | 08-27-06 10:57 PM
horizontal rule
19

Oy vey. You think Bunk is overacting? That kind of performance is what I'd like to see from everyone on the show.


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 08-27-06 10:57 PM
horizontal rule
20

19 to 17.

Barbar, we talked about some of that stuff here.


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 08-27-06 10:58 PM
horizontal rule
21

20: I haven't read the comments to that thread, and I'm sure it was hashed out, but in many ways Stringer Bell is a very "street" character, all the book learning aside; he's the most ruthless character on the show. I would view his failings as being parallel to Bunny Colvin's.


Posted by: Barbar | Link to this comment | 08-27-06 11:14 PM
horizontal rule
22

I shouldn't get into this conversation, because I haven't seen the show (oh, when did I let total ignorance of the subject under discussion stop me before), but if ogged and his friend are right, it just goes to show what good writing will do.

I've almost given up on movies, because it seems as if all the ones I go to I walk out of thinking the acting was great, the visuals were flawless, and the movie sucked because there was no script.


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 08-28-06 7:52 AM
horizontal rule
23

Bitch, we're all sorry about that time Keillor raped you, but you need to let go of it. You knew about his reputation before you let him he corner you and drag you into the broom closet. We don't see why you're making such a big deal about this.

Our evaluation of a work of art should not be influenced by our opinions about the author as a person.


Posted by: John Emerson | Link to this comment | 08-28-06 9:20 AM
horizontal rule
24

23 in extremely poor taste.


Posted by: Matt Weiner | Link to this comment | 08-28-06 9:22 AM
horizontal rule
25

Mee-YOW!


Posted by: Clownæsthesiologist | Link to this comment | 08-28-06 9:26 AM
horizontal rule
26

Agree with Weiner. Emerson, you psycho, what's with the craziness in the last couple of days?


Posted by: SomeCallMeTim | Link to this comment | 08-28-06 9:28 AM
horizontal rule
27

I wonder if, just as Emerson was fake Al for a while at the WM, someone else is now fake Emerson here.


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 08-28-06 10:03 AM
horizontal rule
28

Emerson was one of the fake Als? There were/have been many of them, right?


Posted by: Jackmormon | Link to this comment | 08-28-06 10:10 AM
horizontal rule
29

I think the answer is yes to both questions.


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 08-28-06 10:13 AM
horizontal rule
30

, someone else is now fake Emerson here.

Seriously? Is the fakeness of unfogged-Emerson constant?


Posted by: SomeCallMeTim | Link to this comment | 08-28-06 10:42 AM
horizontal rule
31

I was the first fake Al. I can't understand why political sites don't clean up their comment lines.

Have I been more untastefull than usual recently? I was just developing Sarah Silverman's joke about Joe Franklin.


Posted by: John Emerson | Link to this comment | 08-28-06 10:56 AM
horizontal rule
32

Um, given that Kiefer Fucking Sutherland won the best actor [sic] Emmy, I think we can rule out the aesthetic explanation for the Wire's exclusion...


Posted by: Scott Lemieux | Link to this comment | 08-28-06 10:59 AM
horizontal rule
33

Also, 22 is right. I never understand wanting to see a movie because there's a good actor in it; good writing is a much scarcer commodity than good acting.


Posted by: Scott Lemieux | Link to this comment | 08-28-06 11:01 AM
horizontal rule
34

People get edgy about rape jokes unless they've got a lot of context. FWIW, that didn't strike me as out of line, (well, in poor taste, but so many things here are. Not significantly more so than the standard, and we certainly aren't planning to raise that), and while I don't know if B. saw it, she hasn't complained.


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 08-28-06 11:01 AM
horizontal rule
35

I can't understand why political sites don't clean up their comment lines.

I think it's a combination of laziness and a commitment to free-speech ideals -- that the answer to speech is more speech. It's taking seriously the criticism that "You're just afraid to listen to anyone who disagrees with you."


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 08-28-06 11:03 AM
horizontal rule
36

I really believe that the major sites have paid trolls. I've been on many very fruitful political thread, with people who agree about most but not all things and are working out their ideas together. Trolls prevent this from happening.

Ignoring them doesn't work. It just doesn't.


Posted by: John Emerson | Link to this comment | 08-28-06 11:06 AM
horizontal rule
37

Drum also seems very willing to let his own site function as the perfect exemplar of Drum's "nutpicking" Law: I'm reasonable, all lot of commenters are handle-swiping lunatics, and so what?


Posted by: Jackmormon | Link to this comment | 08-28-06 11:06 AM
horizontal rule
38

It's strange that people don't do shows in the Uncle Harold Zoid method of acting: show all emotions at once at all times.

Even that kid who played Wallace in Season One should have gotten an award.


Posted by: norbizness | Link to this comment | 08-28-06 11:44 AM
horizontal rule
39

I think that the casting on the show is so good that the acting per se doesn't really matter. Almost every character has a look, voice and demeanor that is so right that it almost doesn't matter how the lines are delivered. Take Wallace. I have no idea whether the kid who played him can act at all. But there was something so vulnerable and haunting about his face and voice that the performance turned out to be absolutely devastating. Same thing with Denis "Cutty" Wise. Great look, voice and presence.

Also, Omar is the greatest character in the history of the moving image.


Posted by: pjs | Link to this comment | 08-28-06 2:01 PM
horizontal rule
40

pjs gets it exactly right. The only caveat is that you have to stick with the show for at least a few episodes to get it.


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 08-28-06 2:08 PM
horizontal rule