Re: With Big Guns

1

Vin Diesel, I hear.


Posted by: text | Link to this comment | 08-31-06 4:08 PM
horizontal rule
2

Right, me too, and that would be awesome, but I'm not sure, so I left him out.


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 08-31-06 4:10 PM
horizontal rule
3

I actually just made that up. But it wouldn't surprise me if virtually all action stars are gay.


Posted by: text | Link to this comment | 08-31-06 4:11 PM
horizontal rule
4

I hear

That's a real low threshold.

OTOH: I'm not sure, so I left him out

You're sure of those other ones? How do you calculate sure?


Posted by: slolernr | Link to this comment | 08-31-06 4:12 PM
horizontal rule
5

Can I work on the screenplay? I know what tone you're after.


Posted by: text | Link to this comment | 08-31-06 4:12 PM
horizontal rule
6

This, for example, makes me feel sure about Travolta, and I say that as someone who's regularly kissing male relatives in public.


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 08-31-06 4:17 PM
horizontal rule
7

I'm not actually funding the project text, but I think you should go ahead and write the screenplay on spec.


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 08-31-06 4:21 PM
horizontal rule
8

Plus, slol, I trust my man the WWTDD guy. (I don't actually know him.)


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 08-31-06 4:22 PM
horizontal rule
9

For myself, I never heard of him until you mentioned him.


Posted by: slolernr | Link to this comment | 08-31-06 4:23 PM
horizontal rule
10

You just want to watch William Donahue's head explode, don't you? Gods what I wouldn't give for a link to that scene from Scanners.


Posted by: Robust McManlyPants | Link to this comment | 08-31-06 5:15 PM
horizontal rule
11

You owe me.


Posted by: slolernr | Link to this comment | 08-31-06 5:19 PM
horizontal rule
12

How come Whitney and Cruise are both at three and there's no four?


Posted by: double-plus-ungood | Link to this comment | 08-31-06 5:23 PM
horizontal rule
13

11: My hero!


Posted by: Robust McManlyPants | Link to this comment | 08-31-06 5:25 PM
horizontal rule
14

Jodie Foster too, supposedly.


Posted by: Matt F | Link to this comment | 08-31-06 5:27 PM
horizontal rule
15

I thought she was out, no supposedly about it. Am I wrong?


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 08-31-06 5:33 PM
horizontal rule
16

She doesn't answer questions about it, but yeah.

I didn't mean for this to become the "who is, who isn't" thread. Abraham Lincoln! I do think such a movie would be pretty cool.


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 08-31-06 5:35 PM
horizontal rule
17

We need another woman, so that the woman I identify with (and that's just not gonna be Whitney) gets some nookie.


Posted by: Jackmormon | Link to this comment | 08-31-06 5:40 PM
horizontal rule
18

Portia de Rossy.


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 08-31-06 5:41 PM
horizontal rule
19

if Spacey is the villian, it'll at least be good

Umm...did you see Superman?


Posted by: Becks | Link to this comment | 08-31-06 5:44 PM
horizontal rule
20

Umm...did you see Superman?

I did. In fact, that's what I was thinking of: boy that movie would have sucked without Spacey.


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 08-31-06 5:47 PM
horizontal rule
21

I believe practically everything I read on Unfogged, but this business about Tom Cruise? No way.


Posted by: Sam Heldman | Link to this comment | 08-31-06 5:48 PM
horizontal rule
22

See, I thought Spacey kind of sucked in it. Or, at a minimum, the whole time I was watching it I was thinking "Huh. Didn't Kevin Spacey used to be a good actor?"


Posted by: Becks | Link to this comment | 08-31-06 5:50 PM
horizontal rule
23

this business about Tom Cruise? No way

I dunno; somewhere on this site I know I said that I don't get a gay vibe from Cruise, and someone agreed with me, so there are two votes.


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 08-31-06 5:52 PM
horizontal rule
24

22: I'm starting to think that was a misimpression.


Posted by: SomeCallMeTim | Link to this comment | 08-31-06 5:52 PM
horizontal rule
25

Honestly, Becks, I can barely remember the movie, so you might have a point. But it's Kevin Spacey, dammit.


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 08-31-06 5:53 PM
horizontal rule
26

18.--She'll do! And since Arrested Development is now over (right? weren't fans caterwauling about that?) she'll need the work!


Posted by: Jackmormon | Link to this comment | 08-31-06 5:55 PM
horizontal rule
27

Portia de Rossi is hot; I've had a crush on her for years, and yes, AD is, sadly, over.


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 08-31-06 5:56 PM
horizontal rule
28

I second 27, but wouldn't Angelina Jolie be a bigger name? Or do bi girls not count once their heteronormative marriages are splashed across every tabloid in the world?


Posted by: Steve | Link to this comment | 08-31-06 6:25 PM
horizontal rule
29

Oh sweet Jeebus. If it Jolie, even I might see it.


Posted by: SomeCallMeTim | Link to this comment | 08-31-06 6:27 PM
horizontal rule
30

27, 28 - I 3rd that (even though we're not supposed to say that anymore, right?)


Posted by: TD | Link to this comment | 08-31-06 6:31 PM
horizontal rule
31

27: See Sirens, then.


Posted by: Chopper | Link to this comment | 08-31-06 6:35 PM
horizontal rule
32

I've had a crush on her since Sirens.


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 08-31-06 6:39 PM
horizontal rule
33

Rupert Everett said he wanted to write and star in a gay James Bond movie. I figure this would be very much gay camp, since the old James Bond is essentially hetrosexual camp.


Posted by: rob helpy-chalk | Link to this comment | 08-31-06 8:10 PM
horizontal rule
34

16: Every time I hear a discussion of whether an 18th or 19th century was gay, I always hear people saying "Oh that wasn't considered gay back then. It was perfectly normal." It was normal for men to sleep in the same bed, or for a woman to make out with her sister, or for a man to write a letter praising another man's thighs. From all of this I have reached the conclusion that everyone before 1900 was gay.


Posted by: rob helpy-chalk | Link to this comment | 08-31-06 8:18 PM
horizontal rule
35

Also, everyone in Hollywood is a gay midget with a disproportionately large head.


Posted by: rob helpy-chalk | Link to this comment | 08-31-06 8:19 PM
horizontal rule
36

300

This has been delayed so long I have almost lost hope. I know it is a Frank Miller thing, but Spartans, ya know.

I am thinking. Gay action flick. I keep thinking I have seen an asian flick or two with gay protagonists.


Posted by: bob mcmanus | Link to this comment | 08-31-06 8:24 PM
horizontal rule
37

36: Why don't people name their daughters Gorgo anymore?


Posted by: Chopper | Link to this comment | 08-31-06 8:55 PM
horizontal rule
38

"From all of this I have reached the conclusion that everyone before 1900 was gay."

Not to mention the bears.

(who were all flaming)

(because they had sex with George Washington)

(IYKWIM)

(AITYD)


Posted by: text | Link to this comment | 08-31-06 9:16 PM
horizontal rule
39

See, I thought Spacey kind of sucked in it. Or, at a minimum, the whole time I was watching it I was thinking "Huh. Didn't Kevin Spacey used to be a good actor?"

I thought Spacey did all right with what he had, it just that I don't think there was much to work with. Kind of like suckitude of the last three Star Wars movies,.not really the fault of the actors.


Posted by: gswift | Link to this comment | 08-31-06 9:51 PM
horizontal rule
40

36: Do not get me started on "300." Only Frank Miller could make the Spartans homophobic.


Posted by: strasmangelo jones | Link to this comment | 08-31-06 10:07 PM
horizontal rule
41

I agree with every assessment on Ogged's list except for #5.


Posted by: Sommer | Link to this comment | 08-31-06 10:12 PM
horizontal rule
42

So would the characters be gay, straight, a mix or the issue not be addressed? Is the point just that the actors are gay, or that it's an action flick in which the characters are gay (but is otherwise like any action flick only better)?


Posted by: flippantangel | Link to this comment | 08-31-06 10:13 PM
horizontal rule
43

41: Pathetic attempt at wish fulfillment. He likes us.


Posted by: SomeCallMeTim | Link to this comment | 08-31-06 10:18 PM
horizontal rule
44

I was thinking the issue wouldn't be addressed, flip.


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 08-31-06 10:22 PM
horizontal rule
45

So this would be one of those all-'splosions-no-kissing action movies? I guess that would work.


Posted by: teofilo | Link to this comment | 08-31-06 10:25 PM
horizontal rule
46

There could be lots of flirting.


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 08-31-06 10:27 PM
horizontal rule
47

I was just thinking "hey, why aren't there any movies with hot gay makeout action?" And then I remembered "fuck, I need to watch Brokeback Mountain." Is that out on DVD yet? And why don't I own a DVD player?


Posted by: m. leblanc | Link to this comment | 08-31-06 10:29 PM
horizontal rule
48

There's very little makeout action in Brokeback. But it's very good and is out on DVD.


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 08-31-06 10:33 PM
horizontal rule
49

Obvious flirting (indicating that the characters are gay)? Or more subtle stuff that could be interpreted as "male bonding" or whatever (with the subtext supplied by the fact that we know the actors are gay)? Or what?


Posted by: teofilo | Link to this comment | 08-31-06 10:34 PM
horizontal rule
50

There may not be much difference between the alternatives in 49.


Posted by: teofilo | Link to this comment | 08-31-06 10:37 PM
horizontal rule
51

Subtle! The whole point is that much of the cast is gay, but the movie is no different from any other (one hopes, awesome) action movie.


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 08-31-06 10:37 PM
horizontal rule
52

Hot gay makeout action can be found in Pedro Almodovar's "Bad Education", if you don't mind all the characters speaking some crazy moon-man language instead of English.


Posted by: Cryptic Ned | Link to this comment | 08-31-06 10:37 PM
horizontal rule
53

Subtle! The whole point is that much of the cast is gay, but the movie is no different from any other (one hopes, awesome) action movie.

We already have that movie. Or did you miss Top Gun, Shi'a?


Posted by: SomeCallMeTim | Link to this comment | 08-31-06 10:39 PM
horizontal rule
54

By the way, let me just express how happy I am to see flippantangel commenting here.


Posted by: teofilo | Link to this comment | 08-31-06 10:40 PM
horizontal rule
55

Out gay actors, Timbot.


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 08-31-06 10:41 PM
horizontal rule
56

I don't think the homosexual subtext in Top Gun counts as subtle, Tim.

("I want some butts!")


Posted by: teofilo | Link to this comment | 08-31-06 10:41 PM
horizontal rule
57

47: You could do what I do and watch DVDs on your computer. Not optimal, but still.


Posted by: dagger aleph | Link to this comment | 08-31-06 10:43 PM
horizontal rule
58

I do that occasionally, but since I'm a stickler about sound, and my speakers are at my desk, my options are 1) watch movie with earphones (not fun) or 2) sit at my desk and watch movie (doesn't much feel like relaxing).


Posted by: m. leblanc | Link to this comment | 08-31-06 10:45 PM
horizontal rule
59

57: Glad to see you haven't deserted us entirely.


Posted by: teofilo | Link to this comment | 08-31-06 10:48 PM
horizontal rule
60

55: If you don't think they were about as far out as can be in Top Gun, you really need to watch it again.


Posted by: SomeCallMeTim | Link to this comment | 08-31-06 10:53 PM
horizontal rule
61

47: You want to watch Velvet Goldmine.


Posted by: Matt Weiner | Link to this comment | 08-31-06 11:20 PM
horizontal rule
62

And apparently My Beautiful Laundrette as well. I'm assuming you should ignore apo about Dude, Where's My Car?


Posted by: Matt Weiner | Link to this comment | 08-31-06 11:24 PM
horizontal rule
63

I hear George Clooney is. Often. (As in, hear it often. Whether he gets it often is another question but I'm sure he does. He's GEORGE CLOONEY!) That said, I've never gotten close to a gay vibe from him, and I like to think my gaydar's pretty good.

Second the Vin Diesel rumor, but never got any confirmation. Ditto that Tom Cruise is actually straight (y'all can have him in your camp - we're taking Jodie and Portia). Oh, and Cynthia Nixon, if you're tallying up that gal pals. Note that Sarah Paulson, soon of Studio 60 on the Sunset Strip is too - her GF is Tony-winner (and delightfully named) Cherry Jones.

BTW, can I just share this with you, because I kind of can't be alone with it? From Boing Boing - a German book on reproduction.


Posted by: moira | Link to this comment | 09- 1-06 1:05 AM
horizontal rule
64

Boing Boing is, as ever, behind the times.


Posted by: ben w-lfs-n | Link to this comment | 09- 1-06 2:10 AM
horizontal rule
65

Considering that half the guys here have at some point confessed to man-crushes on Clooney, if he turns out to be gay, lots of worlds are going to be rocked, in ways good and bad. But I don't see it at all either. Ditto Cruise.

And Jodie Foster pretty much wins the "which gender has to coolest gay actors?" contest for the women, though if we have Spacey, that's some consolation. And although I haven't heard any rumors about him, if we can score Samuel L. Jackson, I think the guys win forever.


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 09- 1-06 2:25 AM
horizontal rule
66

re: Rupert Everett and the 'gay Bond' thing.

I read an interview with him where was pretty serious about the Bond thing. He reckoned he'd make a good Bond -- in the sense of a gay actor playing Bond rather than an actor playing *gay* Bond.

'course, with Daniel Craig it looks like the producers are consciously toning down the camp angle.


Posted by: nattarGcM ttaM | Link to this comment | 09- 1-06 6:25 AM
horizontal rule
67

Rupert Everett would make a great Bond. I still haven't quite got over the prospect of a blond Bond really, although Daniel Craig seems to be a fine actor. He's also kissed (at least) two men - Rhys Ifans in Enduring Love and Toby Jones in Infamous, so maybe they could put more of that into the next Bond film ...


Posted by: asilon | Link to this comment | 09- 1-06 7:00 AM
horizontal rule
68

Oh, and probably Derek Jacobi (as Francis Bacon) in Love is the Devil as well. So he clearly doesn't mind it - wouldn't it be useful for Bond to be able to seduce anyone and everyone in the line of duty?


Posted by: Oh, and | Link to this comment | 09- 1-06 7:08 AM
horizontal rule
69

Lol, didn't notice that! Only me.


Posted by: asilon | Link to this comment | 09- 1-06 7:10 AM
horizontal rule
70

Someone or other --Edward Norton?--says that he tries not to share any of his private life with the public, because he thinks it bleeds into its sense of him, and limits what the public will find him credible playing. Thinking about Everrett as Bond, I'm not sure I could enjoy him playing a womanizer, because I'm not sure I'd find him credible (in whatever sense that word has meaning in relation to Bond movies) as a womanizer. (Also, too urbane--Roger Moore sucked for just this reason.)

I think I just got why actors stay in the closet, even in the absence of overt homophobia. And ogged's gay action movie turns out to be a bad idea.


Posted by: SomeCallMeTim | Link to this comment | 09- 1-06 7:50 AM
horizontal rule
71

63: I hadn't seen that at ben's place, so let me just say that (with the possible exception of the fact that the German father's hair and beard seem to be made of Concord grapes) the baby's wide open arms ("whee!") has he/she exits the mother is the funniest thing I've seen in a while.


Posted by: mrh | Link to this comment | 09- 1-06 7:52 AM
horizontal rule
72

I love Everett, who I did not know was gay. He certainly would have recalled more the Moore line of Bonds than the Connery line, but remember: Ian Fleming wanted to cast David Niven and thought Connery too thuggish (until the receipts started coming in).


Posted by: Jackmormon | Link to this comment | 09- 1-06 7:56 AM
horizontal rule
73

The real problem with Niven is that decency shone from his face; not a credible Bond.


Posted by: SomeCallMeTim | Link to this comment | 09- 1-06 7:59 AM
horizontal rule
74

re: 72

How could you not know Rupert Everett was gay?

Niven would have been OK as Bond.* Of course he was -- urbanity, aside -- an actual bad-ass Commando in WWII so entirely au fait with killing people.

* Of course he actually was Bond, in 'Casino Royale' but that's not really in the tradition of the rest of the Bond canon.


Posted by: nattarGcM ttaM | Link to this comment | 09- 1-06 8:15 AM
horizontal rule
75

72: I boggled a bit at that, too.

Anyway, I hope you've got a part in your gay action flick for Sir Ian. I hope I'm that hot at 60+. (I wish I were half that hot now.)


Posted by: Paul | Link to this comment | 09- 1-06 9:05 AM
horizontal rule
76

There was a song that I heard on the Georgia State (88.5 finest in the Atlanta metro area) radio station in the summer of '04 by Of Montreal that was catchy and mentioned something about a stairway or stairwell. What was it called, please?


Posted by: Jonathan | Link to this comment | 09- 1-06 9:09 AM
horizontal rule
77

How could you not know Rupert Everett was gay?

I wasn't paying enough attention? He played the only straight member of the Cambridge spy network in that BBC miniseries? I'm a dork?


Posted by: Jackmormon | Link to this comment | 09- 1-06 9:31 AM
horizontal rule
78

Now that I think about it, X-Men 2 comes closest of any film I know, with Ian McKellen (whose name I have undoubtedly misspelled) and the guy who plays Nightcrawler (whose name I have misplaced).


Posted by: Sam Heldman | Link to this comment | 09- 1-06 9:36 AM
horizontal rule
79

70:Doesn't bother me that much. Kiefer Sutherland is not a tough guy, nor is Ian McShane.

76:"Spiral Staircase" by Ralph McTell? Just messing wid ya.


Posted by: bob mcmanus | Link to this comment | 09- 1-06 9:40 AM
horizontal rule
80

re: 78

Alan Cumming. Although he isn't strictly gay -- since he was, at one time, married and is out as 'bi'.


Posted by: nattarGcM ttaM | Link to this comment | 09- 1-06 9:58 AM
horizontal rule
81

But I don't know that McShane (who looks like a tough guy) or Sutherland definitively aren't tough guys. I don't think it would be that hard to buy a well-known bisexual as a womanizer, but someone who was very publically only known as interested in men would be tougher.

Don't know, though. I could believe McKellan in a lot of roles. So maybe I'm wrong about this.


Posted by: SomeCallMeTim | Link to this comment | 09- 1-06 10:14 AM
horizontal rule
82

I think it would be very easy to believe Rupert as a womanizer. That sort of overcompensation is part and parcel of the classic closet case.

I'm not really sure, though, that a standard action movie with an all-out-gay cast would work its magic in precisely the way you hope. We (meaning the queer folks) would flock to it - there would be cat-fights in line to get tickets and we would titter like tipsy aunts throughout its run. The breeders whose perceptions you'd want to change wouldn't take this as a lesson that hey, they've already been enjoying this. Instead they would chalk it up to the corrupt and deceitful influence of librul Hollywood, and take their dollars to... I don't know, whatever, Tom Cruise if he's really not gay as a plaid rabbit.

That's not to say it shouldn't be done. I think it would rule. I'd be one of the ones cat-fighting for tickets.

Relatedly, I'm not sure I can give Jodie Foster the crown for Coolest Queer Gender. Panic Room? Puh-leze.


Posted by: Robust McManlyPants | Link to this comment | 09- 1-06 10:35 AM
horizontal rule
83

After Arnold Schwarzenegger play an expert in languages in True Lies, I think we can suspend disbelief about anything.


Posted by: Matt Weiner | Link to this comment | 09- 1-06 10:38 AM
horizontal rule
84

Jonathan, was it Good Morning Mr. Edminton?

You should know, much as I would like to have answered your question correctly, if you tell me that I'm right and you think that song is catchy, I'll have to ban you.


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 09- 1-06 11:23 AM
horizontal rule
85

It was "Climb the Ladder," which I mistook for a staircase I suppose.


Posted by: Jonathan | Link to this comment | 09- 1-06 11:32 AM
horizontal rule
86

Grrr.


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 09- 1-06 11:34 AM
horizontal rule
87

Plus, Jodie Foster defended Mel Gibson recently, remember? So disappointing.

(Although McManly, I'm sorry, but lesbians are way cooler than fags. You really just need to accept this.)


Posted by: bitchphd | Link to this comment | 09- 1-06 11:35 AM
horizontal rule
88

Oh, I don't have any money on one gender or the other overall. I'm just saying Jodie doesn't get to take the crown.


Posted by: Robust McManlyPants | Link to this comment | 09- 1-06 11:39 AM
horizontal rule
89

(Although McManly, I'm sorry, but lesbians are way cooler than fags. You really just need to accept this.)

Laughable and wrong. The definitive "cool" minority was long African-American, and if you try to match up the cultural influence of each group, gay men are much closer than lesbians, who are also-rans.


Posted by: SomeCallMeTim | Link to this comment | 09- 1-06 11:44 AM
horizontal rule
90

Cultural influence = cool now? By those standards Wal-Mart is teh coolest.


Posted by: bitchphd | Link to this comment | 09- 1-06 11:57 AM
horizontal rule
91

Poor B. I think the move here is to blame The Patriarchy.


Posted by: SomeCallMeTim | Link to this comment | 09- 1-06 12:04 PM
horizontal rule
92

I would be willing to say that the coolest minority is whichever one is the least to blame for the current state of 21st century culture; in which case lesbians are doing OK, but the Yanomamo win hands down.


Posted by: Felix | Link to this comment | 09- 1-06 12:06 PM
horizontal rule
93

Only if you don't think violence is a problem. Or that Napoleon Chagnon is a liar.


Posted by: teofilo | Link to this comment | 09- 1-06 12:13 PM
horizontal rule
94

I thought we were talking about who's coolest, not who's nicest. Are you trying to tell me violence isn't cool?

It's just a shame they don't smoke, too.


Posted by: Felix | Link to this comment | 09- 1-06 12:16 PM
horizontal rule
95

They don't?


Posted by: teofilo | Link to this comment | 09- 1-06 12:21 PM
horizontal rule
96

From here:

Maclean's magazine attributes the influence of gay style to the mainstream popularization of such phenomena as "Sunday brunch, wicker, Perrier, sandblasted townhouses and reconverted warehouses, and earrings [for men]." The marketing departments of clothing industries such as Levi Strauss kept close tabs on the gay community for upcoming trends, citing the original button-fly jeans, painter's pants, and running shoes as examples of successful gay-to-straight crossover products in the fashion industry.
Plus, of course, disco. What more do you want?


Posted by: ac | Link to this comment | 09- 1-06 12:23 PM
horizontal rule
97

gay as a plaid rabbit

This would become my new favorite phrase, except I just ran across "queerer than a football bat" this week.


Posted by: Hamilton Lovecraft | Link to this comment | 09- 1-06 12:57 PM
horizontal rule
98

96: They can't mean the original button-fly jeans - those were first made in the 1870s. Somehow, I doubt that the fashion industry was paying attention. And Oscar Wilde would never have approved of anything so plebian. [Remember, he toured the US & Canada to teach the barbarians aesthetics.]

I, for one, miss the day when wearing bluejeans was a transgressive act that upset one's great aunt. [If you had known my Great Aunt Gudrun, you'd have wanted to upset her, too.] I do wish that jeans would go out of favour in the gay community, so that the Kid would cease spending a couple of hundred dollars a pair.


Posted by: DominEditrix | Link to this comment | 09- 1-06 1:55 PM
horizontal rule
99

92 - Those guys responsible for Napoleon Chagnon and a whole school of half-assed debates about the societal advantages of acting like a frat boy. Lesbians are responsible for my occasionally getting the refrain of "Closer to Fine" stuck in my head. The noble Ainu people of Japan are responsible for approximately nothing, and are therefore by your standards the coolest societal group on earth except possibly for Jumble enthusiasts.


Posted by: Steve | Link to this comment | 09- 1-06 3:15 PM
horizontal rule
100

Mamba!


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 09- 1-06 3:31 PM
horizontal rule
101

Mamba?


Posted by: teofilo | Link to this comment | 09- 1-06 4:19 PM
horizontal rule
102

Mamba.


Posted by: standpipe b | Link to this comment | 09- 1-06 5:05 PM
horizontal rule
103

Ma Ma Ma Ma Ma Mamba, por ti sere.


Posted by: Felix | Link to this comment | 09- 1-06 5:08 PM
horizontal rule
104

Inory


Posted by: tweedledopey | Link to this comment | 09- 1-06 5:16 PM
horizontal rule
105

Wait, there are two recent films about Truman Capote?


Posted by: teofilo | Link to this comment | 09- 1-06 5:31 PM
horizontal rule
106

Seems like it. Lots of films come in pairs though, don't they?


Posted by: asilon | Link to this comment | 09- 2-06 4:17 AM
horizontal rule
107

Wasn't the other also cold blood related, even?


Posted by: David Weman | Link to this comment | 09- 2-06 4:20 AM
horizontal rule
108

No action movie fight scene could ever be better than this.


Posted by: Gaijin Biker | Link to this comment | 09- 4-06 12:59 AM
horizontal rule
109

108: Wow.


Posted by: mrh | Link to this comment | 09- 4-06 6:02 AM
horizontal rule
110

108: So the guy licking the blood off his knife is the villain?


Posted by: mcmc | Link to this comment | 09- 4-06 6:08 AM
horizontal rule
111

Yeah, I'm pretty sure buff Bob Saget is our hero.


Posted by: mrh | Link to this comment | 09- 4-06 6:44 AM
horizontal rule
112

Dear god.


Posted by: bitchphd | Link to this comment | 09- 4-06 7:00 AM
horizontal rule
113

Here, this'll wash the gay right out of your hair.


Posted by: bitchphd | Link to this comment | 09- 4-06 7:18 AM
horizontal rule
114

Cool. Joged Sama-Sama must mean something like "Look at my butt!"

re 108: I especially like the way the moment-for-obligatory-clever-remarks by hero and heroine seems to be filled by placeholders: "See ya later, villain!" "Yeah, see ya!"


Posted by: mcmc | Link to this comment | 09- 4-06 7:59 AM
horizontal rule
115

No, but don't you get it, "see ya later" is clever, as it's punning on the fact that the villian [spoiler alert!] improbably lost both his eyes to impalement in the course of the fight.


Posted by: mrh | Link to this comment | 09- 4-06 11:50 AM
horizontal rule
116

Of course, I acknowledge that cleverer remarks could have been made:

"He really took his eye off the ball."

"Yeah, now he's out of sight."


Posted by: mrh | Link to this comment | 09- 4-06 11:52 AM
horizontal rule
117

There's a brilliant career writing martial arts movie subtitles just waiting for you, mrh.


Posted by: mcmc | Link to this comment | 09- 4-06 3:30 PM
horizontal rule