I'm afraid to click that. I've seen some pretty disturbing stuff via buddies who've worked in the "banned" department here.
It's really much more hilarious than vile.
My eyeballs just burst into flame.
My vote: vile.
I ain't clicking, because some things just aren't safe for home neither. When I consider what the Japanese can do to people in prime-time humiliation gameshows, I have no desire to find out what they're capable of when they turn their attention to vile porn.
Also, my entrails just burst and are doing a dervish dance in my belly.
It's really not vile. Just sort of confusing.
Yeah, by overall standards of Japanese pornographic vileness, this ain't nothing.
Yeah, it's more comical than vile, definitely. The most creepy thought is that someone might be into this.
I think I probably overstated with "vile." Parts of it grossed me out, but mostly I laughed at the strangeness.
by overall standards of Japanese pornographic vileness
I'm not sure adopting this standard would be a good idea. "I know you don't like the idea, honey, but by the overall standards of Japanese pornographic vileness, this is nothing."
Really, it's not a big deal. Imagine a family friendly Caligula starring Japanese Rick Moranis as the lovable emperor/inventor.
Wow, it's like the Japanese are just fucking with us at this point...
So weird that they fuzzed out the penis. Also, how did they film that?
The most creepy thought is that someone might be into this.
There's a general law about this.
Imagine a family friendly Caligula starring Japanese Rick Moranis as the lovable emperor/inventor.
Holy crap, Sifu, you're a genius.
What Gonerill said. When I lived there, one of those prime-time humiliation shows invloved a stunt whereby a guy would be outfitted, gumby-like, with a flat costume that fitted into a man-shaped hole. So for example, a couple would check into a country inn, only to have someone emerge screaming from the tatami while they were getting ready for bed. One of these stunts was conducted on a golf course, with the disguised, embedded prankster buried in the grass with the tee in his mouth. Golfer gets into his backswing, prankster emerges -- HA! Golfer continues with his swing and catches the prankster full in the face. Audience verdict? Funny!
So weird that they fuzzed out the penis.
It's the law.
In Japan when they say "It's the Fuzz!" they really mean it.
There's a general law about this.
Someone in the comments here articulated the law that as soon as you conceive of a sexual practice, a web site catering to it is magically created.
Yeah, it's not that vile, just silly: "Giant Japanese Woman Gives Head to a Tiny Man" is the caption. Lacking a Gulliver fetish, I didn't wait for the video to load, but big points for "uniqueness." The Japanese are some weird little fuckers. But I kind of admire them for that.
Yeah, but it's still weird. Such an odd culture that says, "Check out our incredibly kinky and transgressive porn, but god forbid we show you any genitals."
The most creepy thought is that someone might be into this.
Obviously Ogged came across it *somehow*.
And really, why is it *that* creepy? It seems to me to be a hell of a lot less creepy than a *lot* of porn. Then again, I didn't watch the whole thing--does she end up eating him or something?
16, 21: Colloquially, this is known as Rule 34
I didn't say it was creepy, but vile. And yes, you have to watch the whole thing.
'm not sure vile is the proper word. Ridiculous is really the word that sprang to mind.
23: "Check out our incredibly kinky and transgressive porn, and *use your imagination* because we presume that this stuff is *just a fantasy*". Maybe?
OMG. Watching this while actually in the middle of writing about the Brobdingnag section of Gulliver's Travels is pretty bizarre. Of course, in that, the giant women use tiny Gulliver as a sex toy, not the other way around.
27: Okay, watched the whole thing. Still no viler than a lot of mainstream American porn. The main difference seems to be that it's the guy, rather than the girl, who's humiliated and hurt. Eh.
29: I'm pretty sure it was a restriction imposed by Gen. MacArthur in the postwar period, but I'm having trouble backing that up right now.
This sort of refers to it.
it's the guy, rather than the girl, who's humiliated
Well that's just disgusting.
Another thing I can extrapolate from Swift's infinite wisdom is that the tongue of a woman twelve times your size would not feel all nice and soft, but hideously rough, hard, and bumpy. Plus, her breath would stink like hell.
By the way, when exactly did Unfogged become 4chan?
Here's the story, here's more detail. Dunno how reliable either of those is.
In most Japanese porn mags (the Chestnut came home from Tokyo with a good armful), there are several pages of ladies playing the recorder. Now, I can't get over the image of w-lfs-n playing the recorder.
Much as I hate to be baited by the baitmonster, did others think that the man was humiliated?
And I think I said "vile" because of the bits where the camera is in her mouth; no more or less vile than watching an apple being eaten from inside someone's mouth.
Ooh, wet tongue, yuck!
Ogged, you're weird.
Whether he was humiliated or not is beside the point that, while it might have been exciting for him, it certainly seemed boring from her perspective.
Most Japanese porn action I've seen shows very very wet-mouthed girls repetitively sliming something, like, e.g., another very wet-mouthed girl. I suppose this has something to do with the bannage on vagina shots. No one actually enjoys being kissed by someone with hyperactive salivary glands.
He's TINY. Of COURSE he's humiliated. Plus she SPITS HIM OUT and kinda smirks at him a few times.
I'm with Bitch here. The main thing I find vile about porn is misogyny, which isn't in this video. Given the power dynamic, I would actually call this "cute." I'm still not to the end, though.
Yes, Bitch, but his humiliation was hot for him, not her!
41: In this genre, salivary glands are the least of your gland-worries.
So, has this post increased or decreased interest in a Tokyo meet-up?
Ok, now I'm inside her mouth. I think that's cool. Really cool.
This fish lens makes here mouth look weird. What's that thing on the roof of her mouth, before the uvula? Do I have one of those?
I thought it was more boring than anything. Didn't make it all the way through.
Also, are we trying to see who can find the most bizarre example of Japanese porn? There's a video clip out there somewhere featuring oodles of slithering live eels and a strategically-placed funnel, if you get my drift.
WE'VE ALL SEEN THE EEL THING, OKAY???
#51: Hmm, I had no idea the bar had already been raised so high.
I just mean I don't wanna accidentally see it again.
Thanks for eel-ucidating your position.
There's a Tokyo meetup?
I am willing to take it as read that there are stranger things out there, possibly involving eels.
I am totally down for a Tokyo meet-up, HC. Are you in? Bear in mind, it's BYOE.
46: The answer depends on whether all your lady friends are that much bigger than you, or just the one.
With something like this, how much of the target audience do you think is actually masturbating and how much is just sitting there going "damn, this shit is fucked *up*."
Shock value and erotic value often seem orthogonal.
61 to 58.
Also, to 60:
As a corollary to rule 34 - if you can imagine it, there is porn of something worse.
Is there more to this movie, with a plot and stuff? Is the guy normal sized and the woman really big, or is woman normal sized, and found herself a little elf creature?
Perhaps neither are normal: the woman is bigger than we are, and the man smaller.
Wait, I know! the whole thing is microscopic compared to us!
If 55 is referring to Lord Randall, it's too bad it's unsigned, because the move was tops.
Though according to EW Baughman, writing in The News Bulletin of the Rocky Mountain Modern Language Association in 1957, those "eels boiled in broo" were actually snakes, possibly served as eels.
Nobody has mention Talk to Her, yet. This kind of stuff can get you an Oscar nomination.
63: Traditionally, a BYOE event is also a BYOO event. But if you're volunteering?
#69: I don't believe in bringing personal matters into the orifice.
64 has the same questions I have.
Plus: If someone had a being-tiny fetish, would that be considered the same as a partner-being-huge fetish? Are they getting off on the absolute or relative sizes?
This is going to bug me all week.
71: These are eels you know personally? And here I thought we'd be picking up anonymous eels for the occasion.
Do all American men lack imagination? Obviously the point of the thing is to *focus on the mouth and tongue* of the woman. It's a visual representation of a physical sensation. It makes a lot more sense than regular porn.
It makes a lot more sense than regular porn.
I will not fall for this crazy bait.
74: Great works of art offer different things to different people, and I think you are only focusing on one aspect of this. There are a *lot* of guys out there fixated on giant women. R. Crumb is one. Evan's questions are all relevant to this fetish.
75: I guess I just fell for it. I'll avoid the fight by going to the library.
It's not bait, and sure, if you're into the tiny man or big woman or whatever chick, it makes sense. But all the "wow that's so bizarre, who's into this?" comments just finally got to me.
Carry on.
I wonder if part of the attraction is seeing that tiny penis go into her mouth and thinking, "Oh ho ho, I am SO totally bigger than that guy!" Like, with Ron Jeremy, you can think "I am SO handsomer than him," etc.
It's actually a fairly common fetish, even in this country.
David Sedaris wrote about being hired as an author for Giantess in Barrel Fever.
79: Dammit, AWB, I was just about to comment that a comparison of the sadly-now-lost cock photos and this Nipponese wanker should hearten the gentlemen of Unfogged. I comment, nonetheless, but pre-pwned.
if you can imagine it, there is porn of something worse
And that something is described here. Or possibly here.
I saw the eel video at work. I think the most awesome part of it was the maxipad-like object covering the vagina of the woman using the funnel (as opposed to the one with the bucket of eels), because, you know, genitals are disgusting.
Tubgirl's punanny is similarly blurred out, because otherwise that picture would just be tawdry.
This thread makes the baby Jesus cry.
Do not watch the video linked from apo's second article. Seriously.
Dude, when Apo starts talking about "more disgusting porn," I'm not even clicking through to see the article.
I figure anybody who read the description would know well enough to avoid it.
DS, you were the one who informed me of its existence, as I recall.
82.2:
It is smeared all over their faces and breasts. They swallow with effort. The sound is like applying paste slowly and carefully to the back of a construction-paper owl. I see myself in their eyes. We want to die.
Positively Joycean!
It's everywhere by now. The way a fog blankets the hills of a village in Basque. I see a lone goat, a bell jangling around its neck. It bleats and leaps into the air, exploding in a welter of 98 degree shit. I do not vomit.
Man, I can't recommend that play-by-play enough.
Dude, not so you could inflict it on the world. I was naive back then.
What really astonishes me is that it was a custom job, complete with jokey references to the site. That's pretty goddamn depraved.
How I miss the days when a commercial in which hypnotized children devour babies was strange enough.
Plus, the music.
I just learned from YouTube that Tori Amos has a twelve-inch cock. Which, if you think about it, makes her the perfect woman for young Ogged here.
I actually thought this was kind of hot.
98: Sweet Lord.
Actually, 82 mostly reminds me how much I like Something Awful: "Imagine if the Holocaust was a 63 minute long video about pooping. "
This is kinky? I thought giantess / shrunken guy imagery was kinda... known. Like that slash exists.
The gauntlet has been thrown down.
I reserve the right to one-up Apostropher's 82 (which I haven't even clicked on yet) after I get home and can really roll up my sleeves and get to searchin'.
It's easy.
First, make sure you're really really serious.
Second, look up 'ero guro' on Wikipedia so you're aware of what you're about to do.
Third, if you still want to, type 'guro' into Google Image Search. Make sure Safe Search is turned off.
Pshaw. I put it to you, sir, that your much-ballyhooed "ero guro" is merely comic-book illustrations. I shall return with real video.
Actually, having checked it, Google Image Search is diluted due to introduced of other meanings of the 'guro' string.
There's something to be said for real video.
There's also something to be said for the ability to draw things that are otherwise impossible to visually record.
Finally, it's important to remind myself that you actually live there, and that I shouldn't underestimate your abilities.
I'm currently sitting in the Business Class lounge of Narita airport and for some reason I actually clicked that link. It was a whole 5 seconds before my brain actually switched on and I closed it. Damn you Ogged.
But I've never really understood the weirdness of Japanese porn. But walking around Harashubu (I think that's what its called) in Tokyo today I swear I didn't see one girl who wasn't wearing 15 layers of makeup, a miniskirt, bright pink stockings and 6 inch heels. Broad daylight, in a major, (though youth-oriented) shopping district. I thought that stuff was only seen on a screen. WTF?
I'm confused, isn't this sort of sex fairly common in Australia?
Are you inferring that Australian men all have midget penises? Besides it is a moot point. Australians don't have sex. We gain carnal pleasure by watching Big Brother and procreate via mitosis.
Now excuse me, I have a plane to catch. My borg-cube of a homeland awaits.
108: Hi, Juicy! Next time you're in town, we have to do the first-ever Tokyo Meetup. Also, it's "Harajuku", like the Gwen Stefani song.
Okay, I found something, but I really don't think I should link to it here. It's sick and disgusting.
It's sick and disgusting.
I thought you said you were going to one-up the link in 82.
Ah, hell, if you insist, just click on some of the orange "MOVIE" links on the right-hand side of this page. Not safe for work, or for after you've just eaten. I am really, really recommending everybody just skip this one.
Not porn, exactly, but who would have guessed you could get your cervix pierced? As Warren Ellis adds, "the piercee in question is FTM, and the piercing, a personal symbol of the ownership and control he has over his body, has been placed prior to a planned radical hysterectomy."
Sometimes, even I am surprised.
I've got my appendix pierced. It's hott.
Thankfully, I've wised up to the point that I didn't click through to any video. I'll note that personally the descriptions weren't nearly as horrifying as the vid that Apo linked (which I did watch, in part, and am still traumatized) of the guy getting fucked by a horse, knowing that he later died from the internal injuries. Shit-eating is nothing next to that.
The what that who linked showing what?
sometimes I feel very old. Has anyone ever died of his injuries after clicking through on the links from here?
The what that who linked showing what?
There has been a documentary made about it.
It's sick and disgusting.
Was it this?