I imagine she'd be more comfortable with her shoes off. The heels are probably digging into the tendon at the back.
I've never worn that kind of shoe, so I don't know. but that's how it looks.
Please! In that situation I discreetly peak at my Blackberry. Do you think I'm a cad or something?
discreetly peak at my Blackberry
Doesn't that damage the screen?
Why do you think I like it doggy-style?
This could be the poster for UnfoggeDCon III.
Why do you think I like it doggy-style?
Well, your handle *is* "Bitch".
8: Only if there's a separate poster for the chicks.
No this poster seems very inclusive. A separate one would be sexist.
Mmhm. Not only is this poster sexist, it's totally heteronormative.
12: You beat me to it! And what about the orgy version?
At the very least, she should have a laptop too.
Plus, if they're doing it doggy style and she has a laptop, he can be reading it over her shoulder.
Comity!
And what about the orgy version?
LAN party.
Jesus, Ogged, can't you hide this under the fold?
So. How about a nice game of table tennis?
At the very least, she should have a laptop too.
I think she's looking down at one.
Also, was it ever an actual tradition for boys/young men to learn basic sex positions through interaction with prostitutes, or is that just a trope of picaresque novels?
I think she's looking down at one.
Actually, I think maybe she's watching a TV off to the left, out of frame.
19: Teo, you too?
The progress of nihilism continues apace.
Teo, you too?
Of course me. Is this a surprise?
Plus, if they're doing it doggy style and she has a laptop, he can be reading it over her shoulder.
One of my exes had issues with doggy style because she once looked back and caught her then-boyfriend concentrating on the football game they'd been watching.
Why do you think I like it doggy-style?
So functional! The bottom can read a book on the "work" surface. The top can read a book on the bottom's backside. The new Unfogged reading group.
That's not doggy style. That's reverse cowgirl, no?
Also: I have a friend who is in a film -- shown only in NYC's finest galleries, made by an artist with multiple solo shows to his credit and NYer, NYTimes, VV reviews, etc. -- set up much like this, but she's the one reading, and it's fashion mags.
i am more versed in badminton
which is a nice game too
So. How about a nice game of table tennis?
See, you laughed at me then, but now you see the alternative.
The virgins haven't been on the side of the prudes since medieval times, IA.
That's not doggy style. That's reverse cowgirl, no?
I had been wondering since 6 whether it was a deliberate non sequitur or just teh voices in her head again.
Oudemia, you vixen, you're supposed to a) read the thread and b) link to stills.
What is this table tennis thing? It sounds like the quote from the Manchurian Candidate, but that's "solitaire".
I had been wondering since 6 whether it was a deliberate non sequitur or just teh voices in her head again.
I was assuming deliberate non sequitur. That's kind of her thing.
I was about to say what oudemia said, but she got to it first.
That said, actual doggy-style would be a lot better for surfing the internet than the position that woman is in.
No, she's suggesting that doggy style allows her to use the laptop. Right?
Buh-but, I *did* read the thread. I'm confused.
I'm not sure there are stills, and I will not look! There was a poster at the time of the opening, though. Also at the opening: Interpretive Dance. No joke.
No, she's suggesting that doggy style allows her to use the laptop. Right?
Right.
I was about to say what oudemia said, but she got to it first.
You're the woman in the video art?
That said, actual doggy-style would be a lot better for surfing the internet than the position that woman is in.
but her position is better for talking on the phone.
You're all so mean to B. 6 says that B prefers doggy style because reverse cowgirl with heels on is uncomfortable, as Ben explains in 2. Of course, that reveals that B likes to get it on while wearing heels, but hey.
No, I think doggy-style would be better for talking on the phone, too.
In fact, it's better for just about anything.
Teo, the interpretations are not exclusive of each other. Comity.
You people all completely lack imagination.
Except for Jesus.
Not only imagination, but apparently actual experience fucking and web-surfing at the same time. Y'all should be ashamed.
I don't deny that I lack experience fucking and web-surfing simultaneously.
39, see 35. You don't get credit for riding Jesus's coattails. Anyway, I don't think you're *allowed* to ride Jesus's coattails, what with being Jewish and all.
What? 39 was meant to indicate that 37 was what I meant by 35.
19: I don't see anything, SFW or otherwise. I've un-NoScripted everything and want the funny! (Presuming it's funny, of course. If it's just raunch, well, the Google Image Search for "reverse cowgirl" can satisfy that.) (Because oudemia was right on the money, as I learned whilst crossing my fingers hoping the wife didn't come in.)
You don't get credit for riding Jesus's coattails.
We'll see about that.
Also, this thread needs vids.
54 makes no sense. If 6 had been a non-sequitur, it would have been *off* topic. But in fact it was completely *on* topic.
(Because oudemia was right on the money, as I learned whilst crossing my fingers hoping the wife didn't come in suddenly lean back and crack the screen.)
55: That's odd. It is funny, and I don't see why it wouldn't work for you. Anyone else have problems with it?
If 6 had been a non-sequitur, it would have been *off* topic. But in fact it was completely *on* topic.
You must be new here.
But seriously, what I meant was that you were doing your thing where you comment not on the exact topic of the post, but on a closely related topic instead. The position in the post is not doggy-style.
I'll say it, since no one else will. I understood 6 straight off.
61 is correct. 6 was clearly written as if responding to something, and yet there was nothing in the current thread it could have been responding to.
It's doggy-style, just rotated 90 degrees. More gravitocentric sex talk at Unfogged. For shame.
61: Right, because the picture is sexist. But the *title* of the post is "We've *All* Been There," which is inclusive. Q.E.D.
62: Yeah, right, sure you did.
Right, because the picture is sexist.
I see you're ignoring the possibility that she has a laptop open at a 180-degree angle and is looking down at it.
Any picture of a man and a woman is sexist. We can all agree on that.
since no one else will
But I already as much as said it, w-lfs-n.
66: Making shit up that is completely at odds with the evidence (plus, hello? Angle of her face, looking to the left?) will not save you, Ned.
I see you're ignoring the possibility that she has a laptop open at a 180-degree angle and is looking down at it.
As well she should, since she clearly isn't looking down.
62: Yeah, right, sure you did.
B..but I did! Really!
See, you laughed at me then, but now you see the alternative.
Forgive me, Father, for I have sinned. It's been too long since my last confession, but I am truly unsettled by the alternative.
Ogged, what is this nonsense about medieval prudery? Those folks were earthy.
Q.E.D.
Whatever. I'm not going to continue with this, since I know you're never going to concede, but I still maintain that I, too, understood 6 straight off.
A girl gives a little free info about her sex life, and everyone has to jump on her.
Oh, that's her nose! I thought that was her ear.
My screen is really dark and I have no idea how to make it brighter, so it's hard to get subtleties. It's at almost maximum brightness setting, and when it initially gets turned on it looks really bright. Then it's really bright in the login screen. Then I click on my name, and it starts loading my profile, and once everything appears on the desktop it gets much darker. I cannot figure out what setting to change in order to prevent this from happening when I log into my profile.
Those folks were earthy.
True, but they seemed to consider virginity a positive good. Insanity.
Oh, that's her nose! I thought that was her ear.
WTF? That doesn't look anything like an ear, no matter how dim your monitor is.
A girl gives a little free info about her sex life, and everyone has to jump on her.
Don't make it too easy, B.
Not only imagination, but apparently actual experience fucking and web-surfing at the same time. Y'all should be ashamed.
I like this rhetorical move. "Not only imagination, but apparently actual experience x-ing and y-ing at the same time" where x is some sexual practice and y some other task.
E.g., oral sex and eating a cheeseburger; anal and loading the dishwasher; erotic massage and spellchecking the dissertation. Etc.
It does when, if you imagine her looking down, her chin could be interpreted as being her nose.
Seriously, I can't tell where her hair stops and the background begins. The gestalt becomes misleading.
GONERILL YOU LOSE ALL CREDIBILITY UNLESS YOU POSTED 80 WHILE DOING SOME SEXUAL THING OTHER THAN POCKET POOL
I just have to give some love to your image names. Top notch, always.
It does when, if you imagine her looking down, her chin could be interpreted as being her nose.
But it's pointy!
The picture reminds me: are there actually men (or other porn-consumers) who are turned on by women naked except for heels? Or is that some kind of vestigial fetish that now exists only in pornography?
There are actually men who are *not* porn consumers who find naked women in heels sexy, as a matter of fact.
GONERILL YOU LOSE ALL CREDIBILITY UNLESS YOU POSTED 80 WHILE DOING SOME SEXUAL THING OTHER THAN POCKET POOL
Cry, cry, load dishwasher, cry.
||
This article is kind of interesting, but I draw it to your attention because the woman quoted at the end of the article says "Duh."
I heart her.
85:
completely naked except for heels is not just for the eyes. it can make up height differences when one person or both people are standing.
80: Giving a blow job while holding a baby, fucking while petting a cat, having sex and watching tv, having sex and thinking about something else...
61, it was *not* a non sequiteur. Guy On Poster likes reverse cowgirl because it lets him surf while fucking. bitchphd's response is that bitchphd likes doggy style because it lets bitchphd surf while fucking. Do you think for a second that bitchphd cares whether her preferred position is convenient for her partner?
Grrr, non sequitur, howeverthefuckyouspellit.
howeverthefuckyouspellit
"a blue fish Tuesday".
||
This story is kinda disturbing. Especially the bits from the 911 call.
|>
92: My bad. Apologies.
94: Not fucking the cat! I mean, come on, there are limits.
95: Zackly.
88: On sfgate, the story was headlined Study: Why Pregnant Women Don't Topple, and one of the Mineshaft-wannabee commenters noted "I read the title and thought 'Well, maybe if you pushed them harder'."
95: Yes, I get that. 35 was in response to 31, which set out two options, and I chose the one that was more consistent with that (correct) interpretation.
95: Right, this makes perfect sense, and should have been obvious ti me. But Teo got all the flak anyway, and I was somewhat distracted by the sorority girls, and the dishwasher.
98: Man. That is disturbing. I'd hate to be that 911 operator.
Pregnancy is NOT FUNNY, people.
Anyway, thanks to evolution, the back isn't such a big deal. Now, the cervical pain in the last few weeks, oy.
Since when is deliberate non-sequitor B's thing, anyway? It's not. It's heebie's. Or deliberate semi-sequitor. Hemi? Demi? ... Heebie? Anyway.
98: For some reason, the "September the First" bit disturbed/angered me the most. Just... jesus.
103. Yeah. Brrr.
I didn't take a close look at the dateline so I was thinking Pasadena, CA for a goodly part of the piece.
Well, it could be Pasadena; right attitudes. But somehow I knew it was Texas.
98: If only he'd been shagging someone while he killed them, he'd win the thread.
I didn't take a close look at the dateline so I was thinking Pasadena, CA for a goodly part of the piece.
Heh. The two Pasadenas are very different.
If only he'd been shagging someone while he killed them, he'd win the thread.
How do you know he wasn't?
106.2: For the record, that's when the castle doctrine law went into effect, not a mangled "9/11 changed everything" rationale.
112: Not that it makes it less creepy. "When can I start shootin' me some illegals? September first? All righty."
112: And I'm only sayin' cause I had to look it up myself.
Someone else can try getting a word in any time.
112: So is the "country" liable to be just a typo for "county", or some crazy Longhorn Republic shit?
Still creepy!
112: Oh!
But that's almost as creepy.
"The days when you could talk me out of this are over, Mr. 911 Dispatcher. I've been waiting my whole life for a chance to kill someone with impunity, and I just thank the legislature for finally making it possible."
OTOH, it's commendable that some people pay attention to what their state legislatures are doing, I guess.
18.1 gets it right. This kind of thing is going to get Unfogged taken off the political blogrolls of political bloggers.
Wow. From that post I linked: "Who were the dissenters? Who were the ones would deny a Texan the ability to use lawful force against a goblin?"
A goblin. Nice. Let's literally dehumanize someone to make it okay to shoot them.
This kind of thing is going to get Unfogged taken off the political blogrolls of political bloggers.
Do any of them still include it?
Oh! Hamenator! Dude, you don't happen to know any places around here (broadly constructed) that stock vacuum tubes, do you?
He seemed pretty determined to kill them even before they got on his lawn. Mi casa, su casa. Su casa, mi casa. It all blurs together. A man's neighborhood is his castle.
Oh, most of the political bloggers are guys. I doubt they'll mind.
Tune in soon at the Volokh conspiracy for a long post from either Eugene or Orin carefully constructing a set of hypothetical circumstances consistent with the transcript that justifies the shooting.
The billion-dollar industry that some call the "pornocracy" PLUS the American-style "do-me" feminism that some call just a matter of "choice" (yeah, I'm a feminist stripper, and I choose to be enabled and empowered by your silly catcalls) EQUALS I think I'm ready to retreat to a cottage in Cape Breton or somewhere similar.
Yeah, thanks for coming out, IA, there's always a "B" team.
Oh and md 20/400: I remember Weebles, with their wobbling and failure to fall down. But I bet, say, young w-lfs-n does not.
122: No clue. Weird Stuff Warehouse might have some, but not in the sense of "stocking a selection." Recommend searching the interwebs.
Do any of them still include it?
Er, Crooked Timber?
129, I'm younger than w-lfs-n and I remember them. In fact I remember obese teachers being referred to as Weebles.
CT's a political blog?
I guess I mean "serious blog" rather than "lifestyle blog".
I don't know what other blogrolls contain what, since they're all in hard-to-read fonts except CT's.
120: To be fair, I think the implication is also that Texans are not humans but some evolutionary level above.
We used to be blogrolled at the Huffington Post, but somebody wised up.
Apparently yes, they're still around.
Nevertheless, I'm pretty sure that I don't remember Weebles.
138: Oh, I remember those things. Didn't know what they were called, though; I don't think I ever had any myself.
MY still has UF on his BR.
Does he count as "serious"?
138: Hmm. But in a very different form, it seems. Do you youngsters remember a song about "Weebles wobble but they don't fall down"?
59: There are no funnies there! I'm sure Firefox is blocking them, but still, no funnies! (And I uninstalled IE, so there's no chance of seeing it otherwise.)
(Least not conveniently.)
(Also, to update the other thread, I've been told I'm golden and this was how the seekrit cancer went down.)
136: No, Texans don't hold with any pansy elves.
That whole blog is a horror show. He uses the term 'goblin' repeatedly. In this post he uncritically relays a newspaper story about a woman answering the door and getting shot to death for no particular reason (except that's what goblins do!) -- call me crazy but when I read that story I want to question the husband verrrry carefully.
To address the photo on a moderately serious note...
I've rarely been in a position where the woman was on top of me. Each time, it makes me realize that the penis is not quite as mighty as it seems to be when I am on top and controlling it with my titanic skill. In fact, it's pretty small, not even as big as my hand. And yet she's orienting her whole body around it. It's quite different. and I wonder what kind of movement I could do with my body, but none seems like it would enhance the experience.
You people are completely uncharitable. It's clear from the photo that one of them has cramped or been otherwise injured, and the gentleman is searching WebMD frantically for some internetical medical advice, while the lady is looking back (in between searching on her iPhone with her right hand) to ask if he's found anything yet.
Sheesh.
143: I remember the song, but not the actual referents per se.
Yay for the vindication of SEK!
You should join the Volokhs, Stanley.
145: Okay, a neighbor saw someone not the husband fleeing the scene of the shooting. I withdraw my uncharitable insinuation regarding Mr. Wilkinson's tragic loss.
149: If the music thing doesn't work out, maybe I can sell out in that direction. Bling!
Stanley, sweetie, that hand behind his head doesn't exactly communicate "frantic."
Yay SEK! Hwot, or whatever the kids are saying now.
He's trying to twist the crick out of his neck. He slept on it wrong and he hasn't been able to turn it to the right all day.
155: "w00t!" the kids say. It's the word of the year.
controlling it with my titanic skill
Hope you make out better than the Titanic.
If his neck is injured, she can perfectly well climb off and look stuff up on Web MD herself.
Or you know, maybe go see what's on tv.
Also, I'm glad you're still not dying, SEK.
153: Have you ever tried to read a laptop that's on your chest/lap* while fully reclining? It's an aid to visibility, because without pillows you have to crane your neck.
I've spent an embarassing amount of time flat on my back, holding my laptop above my head with my arms at a 90-degree angle. I tell myself it's a form of excercise.
If his neck is injured, she can perfectly well climb off and look stuff up on Web MD herself.
Like most people, as this thread has established, she takes pride in her ability to do things like that while fucking. Otherwise, you know, the photo is kind of forced.
Hope you make out better than the Titanic.
I dunno, if he goes down, that might make his partner happy...
See, that would work, except that she isn't the one using the laptop.
See, that would work, except that she isn't the one using the laptop.
She's calling the kindly family doctor for a second opinion. You can't see the bluetooth on her right ear.
I'm with 1, which should have shut down the thread. I've *never* been there. But I love ass. Nothing can distract me from ass.
Breasts, ehhh, whatever.
167: but with the computer screen you can look at any ass you want, instead of being limited to your partner's, which is necessarily marred by glimpses of your unsightly cock.
trust me, it's handy.
don't know what you people are talking about, but i imagine this matches the tone of the thread:
One also wonders: why is she still wearing her bra? The heat of passion? To coordinate with heels? I posit the gentleman ought to be wearing a cummerbund, at the very least.
JT, you better watch out for your cock's self-esteem.
This doesn't really look like a "heat of passion" type encounter. She's probably still wearing it because she's just hoping to get everything over with and get back in her clothes with a minimum of fuss.
You make a good point Tyler, one that goes to the heart of the insidious effects of internet representations on real-life sex. But at least until the invention of the true sexbot, warm 3-D bodies still trump the cold screen kind. Especially when we're talking about that woman's ass. Did you spend any time carefully examining the photo?
She was wearing a thong, I think. There is blur at the waist/hip.
Thank you to Stanley and Ben for the two replies to my straight line.
cock's self-esteem.
I feel like this needs a portmanteau. "cocksteem" doesn't sound right, though. "Cockfidence"?
176: stay cocky, San Diego!
One must learn to love his own cock before he can expect anyone else to join in, yea, even while on bottom.
Obviously they didn't have a magnum condom handy and he's heating his balls while she waits.
She was wearing a thong, I think. There is blur at the waist/hip.
I feel so cheated.
I feel so cheated.
Oh, my. You know him?
||
Okay, I'm tired of nethack. What roguelikes are the cool kids playing these days?
If you say WoW, I'll implement RSP just for you.
|>
I don't think y'all understand the pause dealie.
Well, I can't ask PK to explain it because I *finally* just sent him to bed.
What roguelikes are the cool kids playing these days?
Zangband is kinda cool?
I don't think y'all understand the pause dealie.
That's OR, silly!
184: My understanding is that it's a subtler version of "OT", but basically the same sentiment. Just less like yelling.
The point of pausing the thread is that you want to say something off-topic but don't want to hijack the thread.
That is, it's for comments that you don't want replies to.
Various e-mailers I just made up say the pause is superfluous and no one should ever use it.
I say Pause and Go are emoticons and taste like spinach. I like spinach. With a little bacon and vinegar. Mmm.
Various emailers better not mess with PK.
It wasn't! It was a response to 192.
184: I don't think you understand dating.
BTW, HL, does it have to be specifically a Roguelike?
Remember this fun mnemonic for the imperfect passive endings! r ris tur, mur mini ntur. You might ask: is that really a mnemonic, or is it the endings themselves? The point is, saying the whole thing is how I've always remembered them.
200: Needs to be cracklike, laptop-playable without external mouse, and ideally not requiring a lot of right arm motion for the next week or so as I'm healing from an intercostal muscle strain. Ideally it would have adult themes involving sex, drugs, and killing.
203: Perhaps a book? Or a Bond film festival?
PK can use when he starts commenting on unfogged, at which point technology will be advanced enough for him to quickly film a video of himself creating that symbol in real life and embed it into his comment instead of just drawing two lines.
PK can use when s/b PK can use it when
Well, there's that . Or web boggle. Or, uh, 4chan, I guess.
208 should read that dwarf thing &etc. I fail.
When will PK start commenting? It has to happen eventually, why not ease him in now?
204 What's the emoticon for a withering look that suggests that you just don't get it, maaaan?
How do we know PK isn't commenting under a pseudonym other than PK? In fact, how do I know that you're not PK cleverly trying to throw us off?
google is suggesting that's a Kibo allusion. I don't get Kibo references.
Maybe you need to watch more episodes of the Special Show, then.
Further research shows that it was Newt Breath impersonating me, and not PK phd, as earlier suspected.
Apropos of nothing, I thought that Emerson (and perhaps ogged), among others, might get a kick out of the following passage, which I just came across for the first time tonight, from the Norton edition of Chekhov's "The Lady with the Dog."
"Repeated and bitter experience had taught him that every fresh intimacy, while at first introducing such pleasant variety into everyday life, and offering itself as a charming, light adventure, inevitably developed, among decent people (especially in Moscow, where they are so irresolute and slow to move), into a problem of excessive complication leading to an intolerably irksome situation."
Forgive me if I presume.
EVERYONE IN THE WORLD should hear Chekhov's message.
221: No presumption at all, but where's the pause sign?
And you're all uncultured Californians. He is obviously reading Chekhov on his laptop, so as to squeeze the oily tokay of Schadenfreude from the grapes of pleasure.
224: Yeah, Gonerill told us on another thread. Fuck indeed.
For some reason, the news about Ike Turner didn't elicit the same distress.
Strange that no-one has mentioned the cat
drink your pomegranate juice 3 times a day
Seeing the picture, I finally understand how the rest of you find time to read all the 600-comment threads Unfogged now generates on a daily basis. It's a sacrifice I'm not yet ready to make, but I commend the rest of you for you dedication to the cause.
230 seems to have forced everyone back to work. Thanks, MAE.
232: "work" s/b "missionary position"
233: My company has a policy forbidding that, unfortunately.
This post might also have been titled Unfogged: Blogging from Behind to match the post below. I like symmetry.
234:How explicit is that policy?
Apocryphal evidence—c'mon, who would tell me?—from my long-time employer of people "interrupted" at work suggest widely divergent outcomes. I'd guess if it's one other person finding a consenting pair, that there's a lot of discretion involved in most workplaces.
234. Which positions do they endorse, then?
This post might also have been titled Unfogged: Blogging from Behind to match the post below. I like symmetry.
Now, I am wondering about the name "Flophouse." Seems oddly impotent.
Now, I am wondering about the name "Flophouse." Seems oddly impotent.
And "mineshaft" too. Shafting the mine sounds de-foresting someone's pristine ecology.
de-foresting someone's pristine ecology
I've always been intimidated by the Mineshaft. It sounds so big. So expansive. Will I be up to the task>!?!!!
Also: I have a friend who is in a film -- shown only in NYC's finest galleries, made by an artist with multiple solo shows to his credit and NYer, NYTimes, VV reviews, etc. -- set up much like this, but she's the one reading, and it's fashion mags.
That reminds me of of this film.
re: 237
I thought employers typically demanded their employees bend over, while they did the ...
When will PK start commenting?
He did not too long ago, but I can't find it now.
He did not too long ago, but I can't find it now.
I seem to recall that he made a very sexist remark.
Chekhov invented the pseudonymous chat blog:
And through some strange, perhaps accidental, conjunction of circumstances, everything that was essential, of interest and of value to him, everything in which he was sincere and did not deceive himself, everything that made the kernel of his life, was hidden from other people; and all that was false in him, the sheath in which he hid himself to conceal the truth--such, for instance, as his work in the bank, his discussions at the club, his "lower race," his presence with his wife at anniversary festivities--all that was open.
What was "his 'lower race'" referring to?
248: The effects of fiber in his diet.
Speaking of PK, for your entertainment.
what a cute little girl on that bearded lady's lap.
What's with the gay long hair rolled up trouser leg?
Women. He writes of Gurov:
поэтому о женщинах отзывался почти всегда дурно, и когда в его присутствии говорили о них, то он называл их так:
- Низшая раса!
Wow. Never in my life has my hair been that long.
What's with the gay long hair rolled up trouser leg?
That was my question, too.
My sister had hair that long and that color when she was PK's age.
I had hair that long in college.
What 255 said. I had long hair as a girl, but I don't think it was ever as long as PK's.
But very cute photo.
I had long hair as a girl,
I initially read this as alluding to a gender transition in your past. One that included a haircut.
Yeah, cute photo.
I had hair about half that long when I was about 3 [hippy parents, etc], but not that long again till late teens.
The pants leg thing, I dunno. I think he rolled his own pants legs up that morning and that's just how it turned out. One of the photo assistants offered to roll it down, but I said, "nah, that's just how he looks, you know?" I'm all about the documentary effect of Santa pictures--no fancy outfits for my kid!
And yes, he does look panicked. Which is hilarious, because they actually had a perfectly nice chat.
Or maybe he's been initiated into a gang.
221: No presumption at all, but where's the pause sign?
No, no; I wanted comments on this one.
What was "his 'lower race'" referring to?
In "The Lady with the Dog," Chekhov's narrator refers to women as a "lower race." (I may have been pwned regarding this distinction by lw's Cyrillic in 254, but I really wouldn't have the faintest idea. I may also have used italics too many times in this comment. Whatevs.)
EVERYONE IN THE WORLD should hear Chekhov's message.
Thanks for responding, Emerson. You made me laugh.
Strange that no-one has mentioned the cat.
At first glance of this picture, I thought that was a small black cat sitting quietly by the guy's right arm.
PK's hair looks great. And he has a very masculine face that offsets any gender-bending stuff. I see a surfer-boy future and a trail of broken hearts before he settles down.
I see a surfer-boy future
Yeah, he doesn't look girly at all. Totally little California surfer dude.
Does he have a shark-tooth on a thong necklace? Isn't that required for surfer dudeness?
I've certainly never had hair that long that looked that good.
Yeah, he doesn't look girly at all.
When you posted it at my site, I thought it was a picture of you as a kid until I looked at the file name.
...where "you" represents BitchPhd.
now we know what PK is a pseudonym for though: Zak Hanson.
Not that there would be anything wrong with PK being girly.
My grandnephew has so many adoring female relatives that he talks like a girl. He also has a cute little toy tea service that he plays with.
